1 / 16

SLOVENI AN REGISTER-BASED CENSUS – administrative versus statistical approach

SLOVENI AN REGISTER-BASED CENSUS – administrative versus statistical approach. Danilo Dolenc Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia. Introduction. Slovenia is a n example of change of main census method. First step – 2002 Census. Combined method of enumeration

danyl
Download Presentation

SLOVENI AN REGISTER-BASED CENSUS – administrative versus statistical approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SLOVENIAN REGISTER-BASED CENSUS – administrative versus statistical approach Danilo Dolenc Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia

  2. Introduction • Slovenia is an example of change of main census method

  3. First step – 2002 Census • Combined method of enumeration • Register based (data on persons only) • About 10 administrative and statistical sources have been used • Pre-printed questionnaires • 10 topics entirely taken from registers (not included in questionnaire) • Complete field enumeration (dwellings, households, persons – only data not available in sources)

  4. Next step – new sources • Three main administrative sources • Persons • CPR – available since 1986 • Households • Household Register (electronic form since 2007) • Paper forms exit before – but not usedfor statistical purposes • Dwellings • Real Estate Register • Established in 2007 by Surveying and Mapping Authority

  5. Sources by topic (1) • About 30 sources are identified • POPULATION TOPICS • Central Population Register • Register of Foreigners • 2002 Census • Statistical demographic surveys on birth and migration • Identificators: SID* and BA_DN** * SID – statistical identificator (substitute for PIN) ** BA – building address DN - dwelling number

  6. Sources by topic (2) • ACTIVITY • Statistical Register on Employment • Business Register • Unemployment Register • Statistical survey on students • Statistical survey on scholarship • Income Tax Register • Database on Beneficiaries of Pensions • Social and Health Security database • Database on Social Benefits • Identificator: SID

  7. Sources by topic (3) • EDUCATION • Statistical Register on Employment • Unemployment database • Statistical survey on students • Statistical survey on scholarship • Statistical survey on graduates, master’s and doctoral graduates • 2002 Census • General and vocational matura examination database • Chamber’s examination databases • Identificator: SID

  8. Sources by topic (4) • HOUSEHOLD TOPICS • Household Register (HR) • Based on statement made by household member(s) • DWELLING TOPICS • Real Estate Register (RER) • Will be also used for taxation in the future Identificators: SID and BA_DN

  9. Household Register • Relevant data • Dwelling number (DN)(running number in the scope of address - BA) - also in RER and CPR • Household number (HN) (running number in the scope of address - BA) - only in HR • Relation to the reference person of household • The main advantage • Possibility of direct derivation of household composition / type of family for the most persons • Housekeeping concept

  10. Data integration - input HR data RER data DN 3 DN 4 DN 1 DN 2 BA

  11. Data integration - output DN 3 1 HH (x1) DN 4 2 HH (x3 and x4) DN 1 Vacant DN 2 1 HH (x 2) * One-person household ** Lone father household with other persons BA

  12. Households quality assessment • Administrative obstacles • Legislation • Household data only for permanent residence • Statistical concepts versus administrative ones • Definition of usual residence • No data on collective households • Inconsistency of source data • Relation to reference person and age • Relation to reference person and marital status • Incompleteness of source data • Missing data on dwelling number

  13. Households quality assessment • Statistical obstacles • Recently established source • Not used for statistical purposes yet • Complexity of relations in households • Multi-family households • Comparability of the results to previous censuses or current field surveys • New concept/definition of household • Underestimation of consensual unions • ‘’Broken’’ households • No reference person • Reference person is under certain age

  14. Results of test database • Direct derivation of household/family types • Simple rules – 80 % • Complex criteria – 6 % • Reasons for non-derivation • Records without household number – 4 % • Records without relation to RP – 2 % • Records with unknown relation to RP – 7 % • Fault records - only 1 %

  15. Improvement of the process • Introduction of quality indicators • Measuring every change of input data • Use of statistical methods • Setting up households • Distinguish institutional households • Consensual unions

  16. Conclusion • Structural changes of size of household and types of families are expected • Huge increase of one-person households • Focus on developing statistical methods • Improving quality in close coopeation with administrative source • Feedback in aggregate form • Common interest

More Related