Using EoH tools to identify values and threats to those values (tools 1 and 2)

1. Using EoH tools to identify values and threats to those values(tools 1 and 2)

3. Context Tools • Tool 1: Identifying Site Values and Management Objectives • Background: Developed from TNC methodology for identifying priority conservation targets • Concept: Define ‘key’ values, including OUV and associated objectives which drive management and the assessment process • Methodology and datasheet: guides sites through the process of identifying range of values for biodiversity cultural, economic, educational and social values

4. Worksheet 1a • Values = what is important within the site • Objectives = concrete management aims • Documents the major site values and relates these to the principal management objectives • Understanding values helps inform the entire management effectiveness assessment and management planning process

5. Review information sources: • Site nomination report • Statements of OUV and Authenticity and Significance • Management and/or other planning documents • Other reports • Interviews with local people/experts Identify major values Identify major values and their relationship to World Heritage status List principal management objectives and relate these to values where appropriate Identify values and objectives

9. Using the worksheet in the management planning process • Tool 1 is used to set the context for the EoH process – can highlight problems in management context • In Sangay National Park in Ecuador, the initial management assessment undertaken using this tool identified the need to revise the management plan to ensure the objectives better reflected the site’s values and management challenges • Ensuring that values match objectives can be a time consuming process

10. Context Tools • Tool 2: Identifying Threats • Background: Developed from work carried out by TNC • Concept: Understanding the causes and impacts of threats and the urgency of action • Methodology and datasheet: Guidance on characteristics of current and potential threats for each value identified in tool 1 and summarise its impacts (extents and intensity) and the urgency of management responses (actions)

11. Understanding threats • Threats are major problems facing a site: i.e. forest loss or degradation of a coral reef • Causes of threats are the reasons why the forest is disappearing (e.g. illegal logging and agricultural encroachment) or coral is degrading (e.g. tourist over-use, global warming etc) • Impacts of threats are the problems that result: e.g. for forests, an impact could be soil erosion; for coral reefs, loss of fish species through loss of spawning areas • Also considers current and potential threats

12. Uses of the assessment • It allows managers to develop strategies for threat abatement by tackling the actual causes of the threat • As threats can create more than one impact, management activities can be prioritized according to the causes responsible for the gravest and most numerous impacts • If causes cannot be eliminated, helps focus interventions on reducing impacts • Worksheet concentrates on direct causes, those within the managers power, rather than underlying causes, such as poverty, global trade balance, etc

13. Assessment • Identifies threats • Identifies values impacted by the threat – and whether they are current or potential • Identifies causes • Assess impact of threat by extent of value threatened and severity using a 4-point rating scale • Management response: identifies actions to be taken and assess urgency of that action

16. Threats and management planning • The threat context of the site should have a major impact on management planning priorities and actions • Tool can help focus on direct causes and decide urgency of action following assessment of extent and severity of threat

17. Working Groups • Identify some key values • Sample of threats impacting these values • Feed back on use of tools • How does it need to be adapted/changed