390 likes | 533 Views
Overview of the GJXDM. Acronyms. XSTF: XML Structure Task Force SIGs: Special Interest Groups NTAC: NIEM Technical Advisory Committee NBAC: NIEM Business Advisory Committee GTRI: Georgia Tech Research Institute SSGT: Subset Schema Generation Tool
E N D
Acronyms • XSTF: XML Structure Task Force • SIGs: Special Interest Groups • NTAC: NIEM Technical Advisory Committee • NBAC: NIEM Business Advisory Committee • GTRI: Georgia Tech Research Institute • SSGT: Subset Schema Generation Tool • IIR: Institute for Intergovernmental Research • NCSC: National Center for State Courts • JRA: Justice Reference Architecture • JIEM: Justice Information Exchange Model • DOJ: Department of Justice • BJA: Bureau of Justice Assistance • OJP: Office of Justice Programs • GJXDM: Global Justice XML Data Model • NIEM: National Information Exchange Model • NDR: Naming and Design Rules • COIs: Communites of Interest • LoBs: Lines of Business • BRM: Business Reference Model • IEPD: Information Exchange Package Documentation • Nlets: International Justice and Public Safety Information Sharing Network • SOA: Service Oriented Architecture
The Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative(“Global”)and theGlobal Advisory Committee
What is Global? • Initiative operating under the support and guidance of Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) and Office of Justice Programs (OJP), U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) • Global – through its Global Advisory Committee (GAC) – is a Federal Advisory Committee to the highest law enforcement officer in the nation: the U.S. Attorney General • GAC Mission—improve the administration of justice and protect the nation’s public by promoting practices and technologies for the secure sharing of justice-related information • GAC consists of broad membership (“group of groups”) – fundamental tenet of inclusiveness and collaboration • GAC recommendations are informed by work of four Working Groups: • Global Intelligence Working Group (GIWG) • Global Infrastructure/Standards Working Group (GISWG) • Global Privacy and Information Quality Working Group (GPIQWG) • Global Security Working Group (GSWG)
GAC Membership • Administration Office of the United States Courts • American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators • American Correctional Association • American Probation and Parole Association • Association of State Correctional Administrators • Conference of State Court Administrators • Criminal Intelligence Coordinating Council • Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Advisory Board • Executive Office for United States Attorneys • Federal Bureau of Investigation • International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) • IACP – Division of State and Provincial Police • IACP – Indian Country Law Enforcement Section • INTERPOL – United States National Central Bureau • Major Cities Chiefs Association • National Association of Attorneys General
GAC Membership (continued) • National Association of Court Management • National Association of State Chief Information Officers • National Center for State Courts • National Conference of State Legislators • National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges • National Criminal Justice Association • National District Attorneys Association • National Governors Association • National Legal Aid & Defender Association • National Sheriffs’ Association • NLETS – The International Justice and Public Safety Information Sharing Network • SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics • U.S. Department of Homeland Security • U.S. Department of Justice – Justice Management Division • U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration
Area of Emphasis:Developing and Implementing the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan (NCISP)(GIWG Activity)
Area of Emphasis:Development of Recommended Fusion Center Standards(GIWG Activity)
Area of Emphasis:Privacy(GPIQWG Activity) • Privacy and Information Quality Policy Development for the Justice Decision Maker (Completed) • Targets executives with a high-level, educational policy piece underscoring the need for their attention and response to privacy and data quality issues • Privacy Policy Development Guide • Builds on the Policy Paper (above) • Targets those charged with actually developing the privacy policy • In-depth, hands-on manual including templates, tools, and resources • Anticipated drop date: summer 2005
Areas of Emphasis:Information SharingStandards and Architecture(GISWG Activities) • Global Justice XML Data Model (Global JXDM) and NIEM • Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) for the justice community – Justice Reference Architecture
Collaborative Relationships Global tenets: collaboration with other agencies and leveraging complementary activities: • Fusion Centers • International Association of Chiefs of Police • International Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Analysts (IALEIA) • Law Enforcement Intelligence Unit (LEIU) • NLETS – The International Justice and Public Safety Information Sharing Network • Regional Information Sharing Systems (RISS) Program • U.S. DOJ • Justice Intelligence Coordinating Council • Law Enforcement Information Sharing Project (LEISP) • Law Enforcement National Data Exchange (N-DEx) • U.S. Department of Homeland Security (National Information Exchange Model, or “NIEM”)
Global Areas of Emphasis are Important • Promote standards-based, electronic information exchange • Consistency and widespread adoption = decrease stovepipes, increase in capabilities • Promote information sharing that is timely, accurate, complete, and accessible in a secure and trusted environment while vigorously considering privacy issues • Recommendations informed by input from across the entire justice spectrum – strength in GAC composition • Emphasis on incremental strategies and support of legacy systems • Not “all or nothing” propositions, while at the same time informing agency’s “next steps” • Emphasis on reuse (Global JXDM) and leveraging/building on existing efforts (NIEM) and justice IT expertise = resource conservation • No need to reinvent the wheel – save time, money, and manpower • Providing real guidance and tools to the field • Global gives a powerful voice to local, state, and tribal justice information sharing issues
GJXDM Training and Technical Assistance Committee (GTTAC) • GJXDM training programs • Reference document development • Technical assistance • National help desk • Knowledge management system
GTTAC member organizations Chair—Tom Clarke VP, NCSC • Nlets • National Center for State Courts • SEARCH • National Governors Association • National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Centers • Georgia Tech Research Institute • Law Enforcement Information Technology Standards Council (IACP, PERF, NOBLE, NSA) • Global XML Structure Task Force • Justice Information Sharing Professionals • National Association of State CIOs • IJIS Institute • GTTAC Executive Steering Committee • Paul Wormeli, Chair, IJIS Institute • Steve Correll, Nlets • Ron Hawley, SEARCH • Mary McQueen, NCSC
Who Created the GJXDM? Global XML Structure Task Force of the Global Infrastructure/Standards Working Group
What is the GJXDM? • The GJXDM, or Global Justice XML Data Model, is a large-scale, object-oriented data model with extensive inheritance, instantiated as XML Schema; composed of reusable components (~2000 data elements and ~500 data types); and designed to facilitate disparate justice entities in exchanging information quickly, accurately, and reliably
What the GJXDM REALLY is • A data dictionary and reference model in the form of an XML Schema • A framework that can be adapted/extended by local, state, tribal, and federal jurisdictions to support information sharing • A work in progress • Intentionally overinclusive
What the GJXDM is NOT • Database technology • Just XML—it is a set of objects and their definitions • Big “J” (U.S. Department of Justice) specific • Does include courts, corrections, juvenile, etc. • A programming language • A silver bullet • A replacement for exchanges and interagency agreements, which must still be defined • A definition of interoperability (messaging, etc.)
An AstonishinglyBrief History • Many separate data dictionary efforts • Major data dictionary reconciliation effort • Created the Reconciled Data Dictionary (RDD) • GJXDM starts with the RDD and adds structure • More on this in just a moment… • GJXDM 3.0.3 is the current release
Governance(Also Astonishingly Brief) • Global XML Structure Task Force (XSTF)sets the direction of the GJXDM • Wide representation: • Courts • State and local law enforcement • Probation and parole • Federal government • Vendor community • Academia • Global Advisory Committee directs the XSTF • DOJ, OJP funds GJXDM development
What Do You Need to Succeed With GJXDM? • Governance • Tools • Training • Resources • Follow best practices • GJXDM • Software development • Domain-specific
GJXDM Design • Standards-based • Structured data dictionary • Represented by XML Schema • Object-oriented • Extension • Reuse • Enables local additions of data components
GJXDM Design (continued) • Overinclusive and optional • Requirements, solutions, and time constraints from rational compromises
Why Structure? • What’s wrong with a giant Data Dictionary? • Lack of consistency • Each person-ish object might be different • Lack of re-use • Adding something new means adding multiple copies • Quickly becomes unmanageable
Why Structure? • Structure buys you: • Consistency • All people-based objects share commonalities • All document-based objects share commonalities • Etc. • Ease of Re-use • Add new types of info in one place only • At whatever level is appropriate
Using the GJXDM • GJXDM is a toolbox • Over-inclusive and optional • <Citation></Citation> is a valid document • Don’t use it “as is” • Use it to create your own versions, following certain rules • This creates a number of other schemas…
Other Schemas • Subset Schema (or is that “Schema Subset?”) • Contains just the parts you need • Extension Schema • GJXDM is huge, but not all-inclusive • Can add elements of your own via extension • Document Schema • Defines root element and acts as a wrapper for your XML documents • GJXDM itself doesn’t have a root element • Constraint Schema • Applies other business rules, e.g. cardinality
By Hand? • You can deal with all this by hand • You can learn about the model by reading the schema • You can create schema subsets by hand • But I wouldn’t recommend it!
Tools • GTRI Spreadsheet • Look up types and elements • it.ojp.gov/jxdm/3.0.3/ • GTRI SSGT • Ditto, plus generate subset schemas • gjxdmtools.gtri.gatech.edu/ • Wayfarer • Inheritance and a whole lot more • www.ncsconline.org/d_tech/wayfarer/
What Do YouDo With It? • Define exchanges • Combine schemas and documentation into collections called IEPDs • IEPDs = Information Exchange Package Documentation • No, I don’t like the name either
Look Before You Create • Someone may have already done it • Someone may be working on it • Someone may be thinking about it • IEPD Clearinghouse, http://it.ojp.gov/iepd/ • Be sure to register your project
Technical Assistance Sources • GJXDM Training and Technical Assistance Committee • GJXDM Executive Briefing • GJXDM Developer Training • GJXDM Help Desk and Listserv • Technical Assistance • IACP • IJIS Institute • NCSC • NGA • NLECTC • SEARCH
Resources for Understanding the Model • GJXDM Help Desk • it.ojp.gov/gjxdm/helpdesk/ • GJXDM Listserv • www.it.ojp.gov/topic.jsp?topic_id=97 • GJXDM User Guide • it.ojp.gov/documents/GJXDMUserGuide.pdf • GJXDM Technical Overview • www.ncsconline.org/D_Tech/gjxdm/ctc9/articles/carlson.pdf
GJXDM Training • Regional focus • Class size of 40–100 • New format focused on • Basic knowledge of GJXDM • Tools • Information exchanges
GJXDM Conformance • DOJ Special Conditions Language • Requires conformance with the GJXDM • DHS Special Conditions Language • Mirrors the DOJ language • DOJ-DHS Memorandum of Understanding • Executive Order 13356, replaced by E.O. 13388 (October 25, 2005) • Establishes an Information Systems Council • Focus on information sharing and interoperable systems
Semantic Conformance • What do we mean by conformance? • Conformance means the ability to share accurate and reliable information using the GJXDM such that the information has the same meaning for the sender as it does for the receiver
Technical Conformance • Import and reference GJXDM namespace or a correct subset • If it exists, use the appropriate GJXDM component (i.e., do not create a duplicate of one that exists) • Be semantically consistent • Use GJXDM components in accordance with their definitions • Do not use an element to represent data other than what its definition describes
Technical Conformance (continued) • Apply XML Schema extension rules correctly and consistently • Naming and Design Rules (NDR) • Exchanges conform, NOT systems • What you call data or how you use it in your own system does not impact conformance • What counts is how you package data as XML for exchange • There is no concept of partial conformance