60 likes | 195 Views
AIDA-2 Gas Detectors 1 st meeting AGENDA 1. Analysis of the EoIs 2. Discussion of the guide lines 3 . Discussion of the model of the gas detector community participation in AIDA-2 (NA vs JRA) 4 . Messages from the gas detector community for Laurent's Vienna talk 5 . Next steps.
E N D
AIDA-2 Gas Detectors 1stmeeting AGENDA • 1. Analysis of the EoIs • 2. Discussion of the guide lines • 3. Discussion of the model of the gas detector community participation in AIDA-2 (NA vs JRA) • 4. Messages from the gas detector community for Laurent's Vienna talk • 5. Next steps
from K. Desch’s slides • Do not ask for fundingyourownlittlesubdetectorwith I3 money • Do not ask for appointing high-levelengineers (thisisrapidly far tooexpensive, and you are supposed to have them in yourinstitute) • RathersharecommonR&Ds or equipmentwithothercommunities (for instance a commonelectronicdevelopement, precisionmechanics, new materials,…)
WP MODELS Models of the participation of the gaseous detector community to AIDA-2 3 alternative options: • via a large NA • via a large JRA • via both an NA and a JRA In any case fix total amount of money, FE studies included (~ 750 keuro) no space for everything ! maximize the advantages for the whole community (even if this can represent some sacrifices) main features of the two different action types: • NA (Networking Activity) has as deliverables results of new technology investigation; financial support is mainly for post-docs and traveling, limited for material. • JRA (Joint Reserach Activity) has as tasks developments to improve infrastructures (like accelerators, beam lines and similar); financial support is mainly for material or manpower to be employed in related facilities (not for R&D).
PROPOSAL PRELIMINARY • A single NA including the major consolidated InfraStructures (IS) exhibiting complementary features budget mainly for manpower & travelling • IS (directly financed) • CERN • MPGD common lab & test BEAM, SRS (read-out system) support and maintenance, support to gas-detector simulation (progress and maintenance) • INFN cluster • Bari - dedicated electronics, GEM & RPC lab • Frascati & Torvergata– GEM lab, material lab, RPC lab • Trieste – THGEM & photon detection lab • SACLAY • MICROMEGAS lab: design, fabrication, assembly, characterisation • Lyon • High rate, fine time precision RPC (electronics, low R materials), realization and test • Desy • TPC development IF (1 T magnet, movable stage, power, cooling, slow controls,…) • Other groups active in the gas detector field (indirect support) • Identify synergies with the ISs • Agree with IS groups about commont activity and get from their resources support (mainly travelling) to make concrete use of the ISs
NEXT MEETING 2 options – decision now • APRIL 11 (Friday) at 16.00 • APRIL 14 (Monday) at 9.30 The community is too large for other approaches: the coordinators chose a date and each group takes part via a representative who is available