1 / 59

Nathan Bindoff and others ACECRC, IASOS, CSIRO MAR University of Tasmania TPAC

Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis The Working Group I Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. Nathan Bindoff and others ACECRC, IASOS, CSIRO MAR University of Tasmania TPAC.

darren
Download Presentation

Nathan Bindoff and others ACECRC, IASOS, CSIRO MAR University of Tasmania TPAC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Climate Change 2007:The Physical Science BasisThe Working Group I Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report Nathan Bindoff and others ACECRC, IASOS, CSIRO MAR University of Tasmania TPAC IASOS Seminar Series

  2. The IPCC is a “remarkable example” of mobilizing expert analysis to inform policymakersJeffrey Sachs (Nature, 12 August 2004) The IPCC assessments are “dull as dishwater” Tim Flannery, The Weather Makers

  3. The structure of the IPCC for the Fourth Assessment Report Co-chairs: Susan Solomon, USA Dahe Qin, China

  4. HUMAN AND NATURAL DRIVERS OF CLIMATE CHANGE[Chapters 2,6,7] Main Focus Long-term changes in the concentrations of the major long-lived greenhouse gases (from ice cores, firn data, direct atmospheric measurements) Radiative Forcing estimates due to the different agents [1750-2005]

  5. Current atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide: - exceed pre-industrial values; - have increased markedly since 1750 due to human activities Relatively little variation in concentrations before the industrial era. Rapid rate of increase in concentrations and forcing during the industrial era Carbon dioxide forcing increased by 20% in the last 10 years [Revised] Fig. SPM-1

  6. RADIATIVE FORCING (RF) [1750-2005] {Global-average estimates and ranges; typical geographical extent and assessed level of scientific understanding} ANTHROPOGENIC Long-lived greenhouse gases • dominant forcing, with high scientific understanding Other greenhouse gases: ozone • Aerosol Direct forcing: better constrained since TAR • Best estimate for cloud albedo forcing given for first time. Note large and asymmetric uncertainty range. • Land-surface forcings • {forcings less than +/- 0.1 Wm-2 not discussed} • NATURAL Revised solar forcing less than half of that in TAR • from re-evaluation of the change in the long-term irradiance • Volcanic forcing not shown on figure as it is episodic [Revised] Fig. SPM-2

  7. Since the TAR, improved understanding and better quantification of the forcing mechanisms  Combined anthropogenic forcing derived for the first time using best estimate and uncertainty of each forcing: not a simple sum of the individual best estimates • Globally-averaged combined anthropogenic radiative forcing since 1750 is positive and causing warming • Combined anthropogenic forcing much larger than that due to solar irradiance change (a natural forcing)

  8. Direct observations of changes in current climate • Global changes in atmospheres, oceans, • cryosphere and sea level. • Regional changes and changes in extremes • Climate variables that are unchanged • Paleoclimate support for current changes • Much more comprehensive than TAR “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level (see Figure SPM-3).”

  9. Warmest 12 years: 1998,2005,2003,2002,2004,2006, 2001,1997,1995,1999,1990,2000 Global mean temperatures are rising faster with time SPM-3a

  10. Sea level is rising in 20th century • Rates of sea level rise: • 1.8 + 0.5 mm yr-1, 1961-2003 • 1.7 + 0.5 mm yr-1, 20th Century • 3.1 + 0.7 mm yr-1, 1993-2003 SPM-3b

  11. Glacier contribution to sea-level since 1961 Increased glacier retreat since the early nineties • Mass loss from glaciers and ice caps: • 0.5 ± 0.18 mm yr-1, 1961-2003 • 0.77 ± 0.22 mm yr-1, 1991-2003

  12. Ice sheet contributions to sea level rise • Mass loss of Greenland: • 0.05 ± 0.12 mm yr-1 SLE, 1961-2003 • 0.21 ± 0.07 mm yr-1 SLE, 1991-2003 • Mass loss of Antarctica: • 0.14 ± 0.41 mm yr-1 SLE, 1961-2003 • 0.21 ± 0.35 mm yr-1 SLE, 1991-2003 Antarctic ice sheet loses mass mostly through increased glacier flow Greenland mass loss is increasing Loss: glacier discharge, melting

  13. Accounting for observed sea level rise • 1961-2003: Sea level budget not quite closed. • 1993-2003:Sea level budget is closed.

  14. Snow cover is decreasing SPM-3c Spring snow cover shows 5% stepwise drop during eighties

  15. Direct Observations of Changes in Current Climate • Numerous changes at the scales of continents or ocean basins including. • wind, • precipitation, • ocean salinity, • ice sheets, • extreme weather.

  16. Arctic vs Globalannual temperature anomalies (°C) Warming in the Arctic is double that for the globe from 19th to 21st century and from late 1960s to present. Warmth 1925 to 1950 in Arctic was not as widespread as recent global warmth. Note different scales

  17. Increases Decreases Land precipitation is changing significantly over broad areas Smoothed annual anomalies for precipitation (%) over land from 1900 to 2005; other regions are dominated by variability.

  18. 1979-2003 1951-1978 1901-1950 Warm nights are increasing; cold nights decreasing fewer more fewer more 10th (left) and 90th (right) percentiles Frequency of occurrence of cold or warm temperatures for 202 global stations with at least 80% complete data between 1901 and 2003 for 3 time periods: 1901 to 1950 (black), 1951 to 1978 (blue) and 1979 to 2003 (red).

  19. Drought is increasing most places The most important spatial pattern (top) of the monthly Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) for 1900 to 2002. The time series (below) accounts for most of the trend in PDSI.

  20. SPM-2. Assessment of human influence f. Magnitude of anthropogenic contributions not assessed. Attribution for these phenomena based on expert judgment rather than formal attribution studies

  21. Direct Observations of Changes in Current Climate • Some aspects of climate appear not to have changed: • day-night temperature differences (since 1979) • Antarctic sea ice extent trends (since 1973)

  22. A paleoclimatic perspective • Paleoclimate information for supports….. • unusual nature of the recent warming in last 500-1300 years • past warming has driven large-scale ice sheet retreat and past sea level rise.

  23. A paleoclimate perspective 125,000 years ago, higher Arctic temperatures likely resulted in sea level 4-6m above present - contributions may have come from both Arctic Ice Fields (especially Greenland) and Antarctica Simulated and observed Arctic warming at 125,000 yr B.P. Estimated reduction in Greenland Ice Sheet Area and Thickness

  24. Understanding and attributing climate changeSummary for Policymakers- To what extent are observed changes due to external influences on climate?- Equilibrium climate sensitivity

  25. Observations Attribution • are observed changes consistent with expected responses to forcings • inconsistent with alternative explanations All forcing Solar+volcanic TS-23

  26. Observations • Anthropogenic greenhouse gas increases very likely caused most of the observed warming since mid-20th century All forcing Solar+volcanic TS-23

  27. Continental warming SPM-4 likely shows a significant anthropogenic contribution over the past 50 years Observations All forcing natural forcing

  28. Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity warming following a sustained doubling of CO2 concentrations Surface Best estimate 3°C; likely 2-4.5°C; very unlikely less than 1.5°C; higher values not ruled out constraints: observed 20th century warming,model uncertainty, last 700 yrs

  29. Projections of Future Changes in Climate (Chapters 10, 11) Basis of Projections in AR4: • unprecedented coordinated experiments using AOGCMs from 16 groups (11 countries) and 23 models collected at PCMDI (31 TBytes) • hierarchy of independent models (SCMs, EMICs, AOGCMs) • new approaches and greater use of constraints from observations

  30. Projections of Future Changes in Climate Best estimate for low scenario (B1) is1.8°C (likely range is 1.1°C to 2.9°C),and for high scenario (A1FI) is4.0°C (likely range is 2.4°C to 6.4°C). Broadly consistent with span quoted for SRES in TAR, but not directly comparable

  31. Projections of Future Changes in Climate (Chapters 10, 11) Figure SPM-5,TS-28, 10.8, 10.28 • Multi-model means of warming for near term (2020-2029) and end of the 21st century (2090-2099) • Likelihood can now be given for the range of global mean warming by an assessment of multiple lines of evidence • Higher confidence in projected patterns and regional-scale features

  32. Projections of Future Changes in Climate (Chapters 10, 11) Figure SPM-6, TS-30, 10.9 • Multi-model mean of precipitation %-change for a medium SRES scenario (A1B) for 2090-2099 • Seasonal precipitation regimes with information on magnitude and inter-model agreement • Precipitation increases are very likely in high latitudes in 2090-2099 • Decreases are likely in most subtropical land regions in 2090-2099

  33. Ch. 10, Fig. 10.15 Very likely that the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (MOC) will slow down over the course of the 21st century. Very unlikely that the MOC will undergo a large abrupt transition during the 21st century. Longer-term changes in the MOC cannot be assessed with confidence Studies with additional fresh water from melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet suggest that this will not lead to a complete MOC shutdown in the 21st century.

  34. Projections of Future Changes in Climate (Chapters 10, 11) Post 2100 changes, Greenland: • “…..and that the surface mass balance becomes negative at a global average warming (relative to pre-industrial values) in excess of 1.9 to 4.6°C. If a negative surface mass balance were sustained for millennia, that would lead to virtually complete elimination of the Greenland ice sheet and a resulting contribution to sea level rise of about 7 m.” • Almost all marker scenarios exceed 1.9 to 4.6 °C tipping points • “.. If radiative forcing were to be stabilized in 2100 at A1B levels11, thermal expansion alone would lead to 0.3 to 0.8 m of sea level rise by 2300 (relative to 1980–1999). “ • Implication, while not stated, is that there will be large sea level changes beyond 2100 (eg by 2300 something like 1.5 to 3.5m)

  35. The IPCC WGI “Headlines” • “The balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate.” (SAR, 1995) • “There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities.” (TAR, 2001) • “Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.” (AR4, 2007) • “Discernible human influences now extend to other aspects of climate, including ocean warming, continental-average temperatures, temperature extremes and wind patterns.” (AR4, 2007)

  36. Further IPCC information • IPCC SPM www.ipcc.ch • Royal Society Meeting, covering all IPCC chapters, www.royalsoc.ac.uk

  37. Projections of Future Changes in Climate (Chapters 10, 11) Projection of sea level rise: • Projections of sea level rise consist of contributions from five components. • In the AOGCMs, thermal expansion provides the largest contributions tosea level rise in the 21st century. • Current ice sheet models have limitations in representing dynamical processes. • Projections provide model-based ranges, and no estimate of their likelihood. • Higher values cannot be quantified at this time, but cannot be ruled out. Projection of changes in various components of the climate system: • Higher confidence in projected changes of sea ice, snow cover, extreme events, and other regional-scale features. • Changes in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation are now based on multi-model means. Changes beyond the 21st century cannot be assessed with confidence.

  38. Projections of future climate changes, averaging periods For A2 scenario: TAR: 2071-2100 minus 1961-90 = 3.0°C AR4 using TAR periods: 2071-2100 minus 1961-90 = 3.1°C AR4 20 year periods: 2080-99 minus 1980-99 = 3.1°C Some EMIC studies had only 2090-99 available; ten year period is sufficient if averaged over enough models or for large scale (e.g. global) quantities; also provide policy-relevant information for earlier century period 2020-29 AR4: 2090-99 minus 1980-99 = 3.4°C

  39. New since TAR: best estimates and likely range assessed from multiple models, with AOGCMs as basis for best estimate; widely quoted TAR ranges based only on one simple model higher uncertainty on the warm side due to carbon cycle uncertainties Only results from A2 can be directly compared to TAR (average warming in early and late century nearly identical, ranges mostly reduced in AR4 due to model improvements and new and better constraints on climate sensitivity): TAR (9 AOGCMs) 2071-2100 minus 1961-90 = 3.0°C (model range 1.3°C-4.5°C) 2021-2050 minus 1961-90 = 1.1°C (model range 0.5°C-1.4°C) AR4 (17 AOGCMs) 2071-2100 minus 1961-90 = 3.1°C (model range 2.3°C-3.7°C) 2021-2050 minus 1961-90 = 1.0°C (model range 1.0°C-1.6°C) [2090-99 minus 1980-99 = 3.2°C (full assessed range 1.9°C-5.1°C)]

  40. Projections of future climate changes, averaging periods For A2 scenario: TAR: 2071-2100 minus 1961-90 = 3.0°C AR4 using TAR periods: 2071-2100 minus 1961-90 = 3.1°C AR4 20 year periods: 2080-99 minus 1980-99 = 3.1°C Some EMIC studies had only 2090-99 available; ten year period is sufficient if averaged over enough models or for large scale (e.g. global) quantities; also provide policy-relevant information for earlier century period 2020-29 AR4: 2090-99 minus 1980-99 = 3.4°C

  41. New since TAR: best estimates and likely range assessed from multiple models, with AOGCMs as basis for best estimate; widely quoted TAR ranges based only on one simple model higher uncertainty on the warm side due to carbon cycle uncertainties Only results from A2 can be directly compared to TAR (average warming in early and late century nearly identical, ranges mostly reduced in AR4 due to model improvements and new and better constraints on climate sensitivity): TAR (9 AOGCMs) 2071-2100 minus 1961-90 = 3.0°C (model range 1.3°C-4.5°C) 2021-2050 minus 1961-90 = 1.1°C (model range 0.5°C-1.4°C) AR4 (17 AOGCMs) 2071-2100 minus 1961-90 = 3.1°C (model range 2.3°C-3.7°C) 2021-2050 minus 1961-90 = 1.0°C (model range 1.0°C-1.6°C) [2090-99 minus 1980-99 = 3.2°C (full assessed range 1.9°C-5.1°C)]

  42. Snow area limit Snow area difference Snow depth difference Ch. 10, Supplementary Fig. S10.1 Decreases of snow area and depth in a future warmer climate Multi-model mean area average of snow cover fraction, % change ± 1 cross-model standard deviation (2020-29 minus 1980-99)/1989-99; 2080-99 minus 1980-99)/1989-99 : avg NH Early 21st century late 21st century Commit -3.2% ± 2.7% -4.2% ± 3.8% B1 -5.8% ± 3.4% -13.3% ± 6.6% A1B -5.8% ± 3.5% -18.3% ± 8.7% A2 -5.8% ± 3.4% -22.9% ± 8.8%

  43. Projections of future climate changes, averaging periods For A2 scenario: TAR: 2071-2100 minus 1961-90 = 3.0°C AR4 using TAR periods: 2071-2100 minus 1961-90 = 3.1°C AR4 20 year periods: 2080-99 minus 1980-99 = 3.1°C Some EMIC studies had only 2090-99 available; ten year period is sufficient if averaged over enough models or for large scale (e.g. global) quantities; also provide policy-relevant information for earlier century period 2020-29 AR4: 2090-99 minus 1980-99 = 3.4°C

  44. New since TAR: best estimates and likely range assessed from multiple models, with AOGCMs as basis for best estimate; widely quoted TAR ranges based only on one simple model higher uncertainty on the warm side due to carbon cycle uncertainties Only results from A2 can be directly compared to TAR (average warming in early and late century nearly identical, ranges mostly reduced in AR4 due to model improvements and new and better constraints on climate sensitivity): TAR (9 AOGCMs) 2071-2100 minus 1961-90 = 3.0°C (model range 1.3°C-4.5°C) 2021-2050 minus 1961-90 = 1.1°C (model range 0.5°C-1.4°C) AR4 (17 AOGCMs) 2071-2100 minus 1961-90 = 3.1°C (model range 2.3°C-3.7°C) 2021-2050 minus 1961-90 = 1.0°C (model range 1.0°C-1.6°C) [2090-99 minus 1980-99 = 3.2°C (full assessed range 1.9°C-5.1°C)]

  45. Thomas will show this first, then I will show it again using his slide; I’ll show SPM-5 building on what Thomas showed for eq clim sens, and TCR, and 10.29 (below)

  46. Structure of IPCC AR4 Assessment • 3 Working Group Reports: • Full Reports • Each ~1000 pages • Extensive expert and government review • “Accepted” by IPCC Working Group • Technical Summaries • Typically 60 pages • Summaries for Policy Makers • 5-20 pages • Detailed expert & government review • “Approved” line-by-line by Working Group • Synthesis Report • Synthesizes the 3 WG reports • About 30 pages, with 5 page SPM • “Approved” line-by-line by IPCC Panel, November 2007

  47. WGI AR4 Schedule • May 2004: Author teams selected • September 2004: 1st Lead Author meeting, Trieste • February 2005: Informal review of preliminary draft • May 2005: 2nd LA meeting, Beijing • September 2005: External review of 1st draft begins • December 2005: 3rd LA meeting, Christchurch • April 2006: External and government review of 2nd draft • June 2006: 4th LA meeting, Bergen • October 2006: Final draft to governments - SPM review • February 2007: WGI plenary (Paris) approves/accepts documents

  48. WGI: The Physical Science Basis • Historical overview of climate change science • Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing • Observations: Surface and atmospheric climate change • Observations: Changes in snow, ice and frozen ground • Observations: Oceanic climate change and sea level • Paleoclimate • Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry • Climate models and their evaluation • Understanding and attributing climate change • Global climate projections • Regional climate projections

  49. Australian lead authors, WGI • Ian Allison (Antarctic Division; Chapter 4, “Observations: Changes in snow, ice and frozen ground”) • Nathan Bindoff (Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems CRC; Chapter 5: “Observations: Oceanic climate change and sea level”) • Robert Colman (BMRC) & Andrew Pitman (Macquarie University; Chapter 8, “Climate models and their evaluation”) • Neville Nicholls (Monash Univ., Chapter 9, “Understanding and attributing climate change”) • Ian Watterson (CSIRO Atmospheric Research, Chapter 10: “Global climate projections”) • Penny Whetton (CSIRO Atmospheric Research; Chapter 11, “Regional climate projections”).

More Related