400 likes | 533 Views
2004 Environmental Scan: Selected Findings Conducted for the Ryan White Planning Council by RTH Research Group, LLC. Roberto Trevino, Ph.D. Alan Jay Richard, Ph.D. Diana Lemos, B.S. Demographic Trends. Age-Adjusted HIV/AIDS Mortality Rates for Texas are Similar to those for California.
E N D
2004 Environmental Scan:Selected Findings Conducted for the Ryan White Planning CouncilbyRTH Research Group, LLC Roberto Trevino, Ph.D. Alan Jay Richard, Ph.D. Diana Lemos, B.S.
Age-Adjusted HIV/AIDS Mortality Rates for Texas are Similar to those for California
Texas exhibited less overall reduction in mortality and greater ethnic disparity after the introduction of HAART than California
HIV Vaccine Research • Since the first HIV vaccine trial enrolled volunteers in 1988, 49 clinical trials of 26 different vaccine candidates have been studied in clinical trials by NIH • At least 13 different gp120 and gp160 envelope candidates have been evaluated in phase I/II trials • Most research has focused on gp120 rather than gp140/gp160 • NIH spends the most on vaccines, but not enough is being spent in HIV vaccine development
Number of Cases and NIAID Research Dollars Spent on Anthrax and HIV/AIDS Vaccines, 2002
HIV Prevention Trials Network Studies by Targeted Population
Federal Funding Trends • Total Federal Funding for HIV/AIDS is a Small Fraction of the Federal Budget • Federal funding Continues to Increase but • Increases do not keep pace with the epidemic • Increases are concentrated in mandated funding categories • Increases Reflect Changing Policy Priorities • In recent years, increases do not include minority services, housing services, prevention services, substance abuse services, or mental health services
Federal Funding Trends (Cont.) • Federal funding Continues to Increase but • Funding for Care and Assistance represents a shrinking proportion of all federal funding • The Minority Initiative, targeting minority groups disproportionately affected by HIV/AIDS, represents a tiny and shrinking fraction of overall HIV/AIDS funding • Minority Initiative SAMHSA funding - the only funding from that agency targeting people living with or at heightened risk for HIV/AIDS - is estimated to drop dramatically in the 2004 budget year
Total Federal HIV/AIDS Funding Increased Steadily, with a More Dramatic Increase Between 2000 and 2001
Meanwhile, the Number of Persons Living with HIV/AIDS Also Continues to Increase
So Spending Per Person Living with HIV/AIDS has Actually Decreased Slightly since 2001
Yearly Changes Among Funding Categories Reveal More Shifts in Priorities
Starting in 2001, Total HIV/AIDS Funding Increases Began to Outpace Increases for Care and Assistance
Starting this Fiscal Year, the Proportion of HIV/AIDS Funding Designated for International Assistance Increases, while the Proportion Designated for Prevention, Cash/Housing Assistance, and Research Decreases
Federal HIV/AIDS Funding Trends, Programs Over $1 Billion, 2003-2005
Federal HIV/AIDS Funding Trends, Programs Under 1 Billion, 2003-2005
The Minority Initiative as a Proportion of Total HIV/AIDS Funding
The Minority Initiative and Other HIV/AIDS Funding, 1999-2004
State Funding Trends • State’s Budget Crisis Arises from • Economic Downturn • Tax Cuts enacted in the 76th session • Cumulative effect of funding deferments • Texas Medicaid Costs are Rising • Continued to Rise When Enrollments were Declining • Enrollments have Begun to Increase Again • 78th Legislative Session Implemented Cost-Control Measures for Medicaid • Preferred Drug List • Managed Care Expansion • Disease Management • Prior Authorization of High Cost Medical Services
State Funding Trends • Health and Human Services Commission to Issue Smart Cards with Fingerprint Scans to “Prevent Medicaid Fraud” • State Plans to Discontinue Primary Care Case Management and Replace it with HMOs • State Cuts in Medicare and Deep and Far-Reaching • Total Health Care Cuts in the 78th Legislative Session Add Up to Over 1 Billion • Cuts Include $42.1 Million for Mental Health Alone • State Budget Cuts in Medicaid Mean Texas Will Lose $1.6 Billion in Federal Medicaid Assistance • State Comptroller Advocating $1 Increase in Cigarette Tax to Restore Cuts • Current Legislative Behavior Make It Unlikely that Texas Will Use the ETHA Option If It Becomes Available
State Funding Trends: ADAP • Size of Texas ADAP is Already Modest Compared to Other States • Texas ADAP Serves an Estimated 25% of Texans Living with HIV/AIDS • Texas Imposes a 3-Drug Limit on ADAP Use • Fifteen States Have ADAP Waiting Lists or Restrictions • Six More Are Contemplating Such • This Year, Texas Participated in Joint State Negotiations to Obtain Lower Drug Pricing for ADAP
Early Treatment for HIV Act (ETHA) • Allows States to Create Medicaid Eligibility Category Specifically for HIV • Similar to Previous Breast Cancer Legislation • In 1999, Congress expanded Medicaid to give states the option of extending Medicaid to women with breast and cervical cancer • Women in this option are not required to demonstrate disability or low income • 44 states have expanded Medicaid to provide women access to cancer treatment • Texas became one of those states in February 2001
Early Treatment for HIV Act (ETHA) • Would Shift Costs from ADAP to Medicaid • Would extend coverage to an estimated 18,000 people at a per-person cost of $5600 • Currently has 20 cosponsors in the Senate • Filed in the House on March 3 with 66 cosponsors
Texas Medicaid Monthly Average Enrollment, Adult Categories, 1996-2001
Average Monthly Enrollment and Non-Federal Texas Medicaid Expenditures, 1996-2003
Conclusions and Recommendations: Funding Distribution • Do Not Rely on HOPWA or SAMHSA Funding to Contribute Substantially Beyond Current Levels Federally • CDC’s New Prevention Strategy May Increase Availability of Some Limited Social Services for HIV+ People • Funding Should Target Services Toward Minority Men and Women Who Have Sex with Men • Texas May Implement ETHA, But May Not, So Do Not Rely on It
Conclusions and Recommendations: Finding More Funding • Greater Coordination Between CDC Planning Group, Ryan White Planning Council, and HOPWA/SAMHSA/NIH Grantees • Pooling of needs and resources data • Sharing of administrative costs • More inter-agency, cross-program collaborative projects • Potential to Increase Quality of Service • Strength in Numbers (Data and Analysis) • Strengthens Houston’s Case for HIV/AIDS Funding • Strengthens Individual Agency Applications for Discretionary Funds • Provides Information for Groups Dedicated to Policy Change • Make Greater Use of Federal Competitive Grantmaking • Example: SAMHSA Funds • Texas Receives Over $30,000,000 in Competitive, Discretionary Funds from SAMHSA • Of These Funds, Less Than $5,000,000 Went to Houston in 2003-2004 • A Coordinated Effort Could Help Increase the Availability of Mental Health, Substance Abuse, and Other Non-Medical Services for People with HIV/AIDS in the Houston EMA • Similar Coordination Could Increase the Flow of Discretionary Funds from Other Agencies