300 likes | 517 Views
The Analysis of VOC Emissions by Mass Spectrometry for Activated Carbon Bed Control. Robert G. Wright Thermo ONIX, Winsford, Cheshire, UK. Introduction. Outline of talk:- activated carbon plant multiple bed switching VOC analysis by process MS analysis set-up calibration verification
E N D
The Analysis of VOC Emissions by Mass Spectrometry for Activated Carbon Bed Control Robert G. Wright Thermo ONIX, Winsford, Cheshire, UK
Introduction • Outline of talk:- • activated carbon plant • multiple bed switching • VOC analysis by process MS • analysis set-up • calibration • verification • example data • benefits of process MS • controlled bed switching (lower costs) • improved accuracy
Previous Mode of Operation - Switching Adsorption Beds at Maximum Rate
Previous Operation • switching adsorption beds at maximum rate - wasteful • on-line - FID analyzer - limitations:- • multiple components (13 VOC’s) • different responses for cpds with halogens and oxygen • therefore accuracy poor • off-line laboratory analysis by GC-MS • slow
Why Process MS? • new method of operation was possible • real-time multi-component monitoring • improved sensitivity and accuracy • can predict when bed changeover is required • more efficient steam use • prevents over-limit emissions • emission sources can be traced • network visualization of data • ability to alert operations to limit solvent use • continuous and complete log of all emissions at this site
Process MS • VG Prima (Thermo ONIX) • scanning magnetic sector • Faraday/SEM dual detector • features • speed • multi-stream • high precision • dynamic range • multi-component • cost effective • low maintenance
Principle of Magnetic Sector Process MS • electron impact ionisation • 1000 eV ion acceleration • mass separation in variable magnetic field m/z = B2R2/2V • flat-topped peaks give excellent long term stability
Method of Calibration • calibration:- • air and 13 cylinders each with a different VOC component at a level of 100 ppm in a balance of nitrogen. • the relative response of the SEM compared with the Faraday detector is calibrated using the mass 34 peak in air (16O18O 800 ppm in air)
Conclusions about Stability • re-calibration every 2 weeks • Accuracy +/- 5% (at the 100 ppm level) • 1 hour reproducibility +/- 1% • longer term fluctuations, day-to-day, are due to the changes in the SEM gain.
Communication between MS and Control System • relay indicates which Stream: inlet or outlet • 4-20 mA signals represent each VOC • relays also to indicate:- • concentration Alarms • MS status • Analysing/Calibrating/Standby • stream flow failure • MS hardware fault
Process MS Applications Software • GasWorks software • PC used for • configuring Analysis • numeric display and logging • trend display • results via DDE • results via HTML
Check on method: MS for VOC analysis • MS stable • analysis gave good agreement with GC/MS for average values
Implementation of MS for Control • Adsorption bed is switched based on on-line MS analysis data • Daily cal check • if outside tolerance complete re-calibration performed • digital status from MS to control system suspends analysis based control
Controlled Bed Switching Fixed Switching Controlled Switching
Conclusions • new mode of operation • real-time multi-component monitoring • improved sensitivity and accuracy • bed changeover is controlled • lower energy costs (steam) • over-limit emissions are prevented • emission sources are being traced • network visualization of data • operations can be alerted to limit solvent use • continuous and complete log of all emissions at this site
Results After implementation of Process MS on Activated Carbon Plant… • Reduced Costs • Improved Control of Emissions
Thank You for Listening! Any Questions?