1 / 16

Transition to Living and Learning Workshop: First Year Expectations, Humanities

This workshop analyses student feedback on Year 1 experience to improve university transition. Explore satisfaction, challenges, and suggestions for improvements in humanities studies. Discover the impact of program support, social interaction, workload, and academic resources on students' journey. Dive into data on interaction, support, workload, and student experience, providing insights for enhancing the first-year curriculum. Learn about students' views on feedback and recommendations for academic enhancements.

Download Presentation

Transition to Living and Learning Workshop: First Year Expectations, Humanities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Transition to Living and Learning Workshop: First Year Expectations,Humanities Prof Adrian Smith (Faculty Director of Undergraduate Studies) 26 June 2012

  2. TLLP and Humanities partnership… prompted by the 2010 pilot skills module in Social Sciences, hence close collaboration with its instigator Russell Bentley (Politics/IR); Sarah Rogers and TLLP colleagues keen to extrapolate from the transitional experience of Humanities ’ Year 1 students lessons for the University as a whole; Sensitive to the change in the fees regime, the Faculty of Humanities keen to gain a greater insight into the needs, expectations, and concerns of its Year 1 students, including prior to their arrival; Humanities funded to run its own pilot skills component (HUMA1027), using the Social Sciences module as a model; HUMA1027 envisaged as complementing each discipline’s skills training, but would it be financially and pedagogically justifiable as a permanent fixture within the faculty curriculum? 2

  3. Transition Living and Learning Project in the Faculty of Humanities, phase one… • drafting of the initial questionnaire [four pages] in spring 2011, with the emphasis upon maximizing feedback rather than undue respect for methodology; • the questionnaire completed by 311 students across 7 disciplines in the second half of semester 2 2011-12; • this initial survey complemented by meetings with two focus groups, and a written contribution from Year 1 student representatives and any other undergraduates keen to volunteer information;

  4. Transition Living and Learning Project in the Faculty of Humanities, phase two… the questionnaire revised in autumn 2011 with input from TLLP and Business Intelligence; a second cohort survey midway through semester 1 2011-12, with 494 students completing the questionnaire (many of whom had previously completed a questionnaire evaluating the HUMA1027 skills component). 4

  5. All means of gathering qualitative and quantitative evidence… … whether under the TLLP umbrella, or carried out independently within the Faculty (e.g. the 2011 assessment and feedback taskforce), provided a striking consistency of student opinion. NB a second cohort survey of Year 1 UGs would have established whether or not a discernible trend of students gaining in confidence and familiarity between November and May of their first year at university – as suggested in the first cohort survey, spring 2011.

  6. Reason for enrolment on programme of study (autumn 2011 data, although spring 2012 data is consistent) 6

  7. Reason for enrolment at university (autumn 2011 data, although spring 2012 data is consistent)

  8. Satisfaction with programme of study… • Spring 2011 • Autumn 2011

  9. Enjoyment of programme of study… Positive: • new people/friends; • studying a specific course/subject/modules I like; • independence; • socialising/social life; • new experiences/skills/opportunities; • independent learning and reading /self-discovery and improvement. Negative: • lack of support (esp. compared to school) / lack of contact hours and amount of independent study; • workload; • converging assignments / deadlines; • living in halls / quality of halls ; • lack of money / financial obligations / lack of value for money; • early lectures.

  10. Further details re programme of study 1…[* the lower percentages here represent the findings from the spring 2011 survey] • 28-37% of Year 1 students only occasionally or never feel settled on their programme of study* • 69-76% of first-years frequently interact well with other students on their programme* • 18-24% of first-years frequently feel they need more academic support* • 13-15% of first-years frequently feel they need more support outside of their programme of studies* • 14-20% of first-years frequently find their studies harder than expected* • 33% of first-years (across both spring and autumn surveys) frequently find it harder to remain focused on their studies than expected

  11. Further details re programme of study 2… • 7-24% of first-years never work collaboratively on their programmes* • 87-91% of first-years feel the number of students in their lectures is about right • 87% of first-years (across both spring and autumn surveys) feel the number of students in their seminars and tutorials is about right • 42-46% of first-years feel they do not have enough teaching hours* • 66-71% of first-years feel their amount of independent learning is about right* • 21-22% of first-years feel there is not enough accessibility of their tutors* • 34-39% of first-years feel they do not receive enough feedback from their tutors*

  12. Year 1 views on feedback, November 2012

  13. Student suggestions for improving Year 1 • clearer, more accurate, more realistic, critical, constructive feedback; • more one-on-one tutorial time, voluntary and compulsory; • more scheduled teaching time; • specificity from lecturers/university on expectations (esp. re assessment); • more tutor communication; • advanced access to reading lists, including recommended reading; • more detailed module information available in advance; • more advice on skills in essay writing and planning;

  14. Further Year 1 suggestions… • improved overall support / communication / interaction; • fuller advice on finance applications, and on budgeting; • more practical advice re time management and independent study; • greater chance to meet others studying the same degree programme(s); • advanced access to reading lists, including recommended reading; • taster weeks, both re academic study, and for societies/clubs; • transitional advice at sixthform level re further enhancing study skills.

  15. Key identifiable areas for improvement, and overall observations… See TLLP 2011 spring/autumn surveys re Year One transition to university, April 2012 report, pp. 11-12 • available from Adrian Smith If there is one all too obvious lesson to be learnt, especially from student comments in the surveys and the focus groups, then it’s the need for greater consistency and a uniformity of good practice – an attention to detail and getting the little things right, but without encouraging unreasonable student expectations.

  16. For further information… Prof Adrian Smith Director of Undergraduate Studies, Faculty of Humanities as5@soton.ac.uk “I hope we’ve met all your expectations, Jonny.”

More Related