1 / 28

Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009

Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference. Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009. Presentation. Provide a status on the Condition of Federal Highway Trust Fund

dayo
Download Presentation

Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research AssociationAnnual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009

  2. Presentation • Provide a status on the Condition of Federal Highway Trust Fund • Provide a view on the future of transportation infrastructure and the role of the Federal Government • Discuss some of the critical issues that will affect the direction of programs and funding

  3. The Future of Transportation • We are at a critical crossroads in transportation history • The nation as a whole has been investing only about forty percent of what is necessary to meet needs • Available resources are at a low point • Needs on all fronts are growing

  4. President Obama’s Inaugural Address, January 20, 2009 “The state of the economy calls for action…We will act, not only to create new jobs, but to lay the foundation for new growth. We will build the roads and bridges, that bind us together.”

  5. Today’s Crisis In Transportation Funding • Highway program faces insolvency in August • Interim funding needed FY2009, FY 2010 • $ 8.7 billion Rescission • Construction costs have reduced purchasing power • Need for New Revenue to Sustain Program for the next six years.

  6. Source: The Fiscal Year 2010 Appendix of the Federal Budget

  7. Funding Options • Accept an 87% reduction in Federal Aid and reduce each state’s transportation program by amount of cutback. • Accept 87% reduction in Federal Aid and increase state taxes to make up for Federal cutback. • Reject Cutback and Tell Congress to Increase Revenues Enough to Sustain the Federal Program at Levels Needed.

  8. In a nutshell • We are in an unprecedented crisis • Immediate action is necessary just to pay the bills • The Highway Trust Fund is just about broke • Inflation has dramatically eroded purchasing power • The political climate for user fee increases is poisoned

  9. What needs to be done? How much funding is needed? For what? What is the Federal Role in surface transportation for the future? How do we best generate the necessary revenue? Federal transportation program challenges

  10. What Needs to Be Done and What Will It Cost?

  11. AASHTO Bottom Line Report:Trends • VMT increase • 2.4 trillion miles in 1993 • 3+ trillion miles in 2007 • 2.9 trillion miles currently • Population increase • 305 million in 2005 • 420+ million 2050 • Truck freight expected to increase by 100% by 2030

  12. AASHTO Bottom Line Report:Needs • Highway Investment Requirements • Passenger vehicle demand parallels population growth (1% per year) • Truck freight demand parallels economic growth (2 to 3% per year) • Growth in VMT will at least equal population growth • Current spending is $78 billion

  13. AASHTO Bottom Line Report:Needs • Transit Investment Requirements • In 2006 Annual Passenger Miles reached 52.15 billion • Between 1995 and 2007, ridership increased from 7.8 billion to 10.3 billion trips • Current spending is $13.3 billion

  14. What is the Federal Role in surface transportation for the future? And How do we best generate the necessary revenue?

  15. The Future of Surface Transportation: The Current Environment • Sea change in views on investments • Some groups opposed to new highway investment • Congress focusing on climate change\energy issues • General view that the programs are broken and need much greater accountability

  16. AASHTO Goals for the Next Authorization • Major reforms • Multimodal solutions • Restructure Program to directly address 6 National Objectives • Accountability for Results 18

  17. Structure Reform:Highway Program Preservation and Renewal Interstate Preservation NHS Preservation Bridge Preservation Safety Transportation System Improvement/ Congestion Reduction 19

  18. Structure Reform:Highway Program Freight Truck freight will double by 2040 Bottleneck improvements Improve Trade Corridors Truck only lanes 20

  19. Structure Reform:Highway Program Operations and Management Improve system performance in both rural and urban areas Low-cost, quick turn-around improvements 21

  20. Structure Reform:Highway Program Environment: Air Quality and Climate Change 22

  21. Process Reform • National Goals • State and Metropolitan Performance Based Planning and Management • Measuring and Reporting with Accountability for Results

  22. Funding levels needed to restore program purchasing power 2010-2015 • Highways $375 billion • Transit $ 93 billion • Freight* $ 42 billion • Intercity Passenger Rail* $ 35 billion • Total $545 billion *(Sources outside Highway Trust Fund) Call for Top to Bottom Reform

  23. Question Number 1: Where to get the revenue needed? • $250 billion from current revenues • $220 billion needed in new revenues • Raise gas and diesel taxes? • Build America Bonds? • Freight Fees? • Tolls and Public Private Partnerships? • Bake Sales?

  24. Political Challenges Ahead • NAAH! Never Again Another New Highway: Pressure from Environmental Groups to say “no” to any new highway capacity in next bill • Pressure to decrease the highway component share from 80% to 70% of program • Pressure to shift funds from rural areas and states to metropolitan areas and urban states • Pressure to shift decision making away from the States to MPOs • Pressure to shift from a federally-funded, state-administered program to a federally-funded and administered program

  25. The future of Surface TransportationQuestions? Janet Oakley joakley@aashto.org 202-624-3698

More Related