140 likes | 149 Views
Explore the editorial history and problems with older editions, and discover the benefits of using Urtext editions for a clearer understanding of the composer's intentions.
E N D
The impact of different editions: • Debussy: Prelude “La cathédraleengloutie”, • bars 19 – 23 • Arturo Michelangeli • Recorded 1978, using old Durand edition from 1910 • Paul Crossley • Recorded 1992, using Durand’s new critical Urtextedition (ed. Roy Howat) from 1985 Selecting music editions
Debussy La CathédraleEngloutie, original Durand edition, 1910 Selecting music editions
The editorial history of a piece: • Debussy: Prelude “Le cathédraleengloutie” • Debussy’s 1st book of preludes was published in 1910. • The composer’s own recording of this prelude (on piano rolls) was made in 1913 but varied enormously from the printed edition • The composer’s piano rolls recording was issued on LP in 1962, making it much more widely available • Following pianists’ and musicologists’ questions about the validity of the old Durand edition, a new edition emerged in 1985 which resolved these discrepancies Selecting music editions
Problems with older “performing” editions: • Over-editing (many 19th century editions were edited by virtuosi such as Liszt and Von Bulow and overlaid with subjective expression marks) • Composer’s original intentions obscured if editorial marks are not distinguished from the original articulation markings • Sometime even notes were added for additional effect Selecting music editions
Issues with 19th & early 20th c. editions: • e.g. Bach Italian concerto (published NY 1918, ed. Mortimer Wilson) Selecting music editions • Bach Italian concerto (original printed edition, 1735)
Issues with some established editions: • e.g. Beethoven op. 13, ii (ABRSM, ed. Craxton & Tovey) Selecting music editions • (from Henle Urtext edition)
Issues with some established editions: • e.g. Beethoven op. 13, ii (original edition, 1797) – much closer to Henle Urtext – including the division between treble and bass Selecting music editions
Urtext • Urtext = “Source text” • Derived from from original manuscripts and first editions • Faithfulness to composer’s original intentions is paramount so the editor does not add interpretation marks • Detailed notes on sources highlighting any discrepancies between sources • Represents best practice in music editing Selecting music editions
Example of an Urtext Selecting music editions • Bach Italian concerto: source (original edition, 1735) • BärenreiterUrtext edition. No added interpretation marks or fingering. However, music put into modern notation (no tenor clef!)
Which is the best Urtext? Selecting music editions
Why use Urtext editions? • Gives the clearest idea of the composer’s intent • Avoids the imposition of outmoded performance practices which arise using outdated editions • Allows the performer make informed choices in interpretation • Enables good practice in teaching – students will learn early on to “respect the text” if the teacher doesn’t have to cross out unnecessary printed editorial marks • May also includes separate guidelines on interpretation and on the background of the piece Selecting music editions
Modern annotated Urtext editions • Challenge of the Urtext – how to interpret unmarked score? • Some editions based on good sources add interpretation notes at the end: e.g. Richard Jones’ edition of Anna Magdalena Notebook (ABRSM): Selecting music editions
Philip Shields, Librarian, RIAM • philipshields@riam.ie Further questions?