260 likes | 358 Views
A ssessments of I mpacts and A daptations to C limate C hange in ( AIACC ). Neil Leary Stanford Energy Modeling Forum Workshop on Climate Change Impacts and Integrated Assessment July 29 - August 7, 2002. Implementing, Executing & Collaborating Agencies.
E N D
Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change in (AIACC) Neil Leary Stanford Energy Modeling Forum Workshop on Climate Change Impacts and Integrated Assessment July 29 - August 7, 2002
Implementing, Executing & Collaborating Agencies • UN Environment Programme (UNEP) • Global SysTem for Analysis, Research and Training (START) • Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
AIACC Funding Sources • Global Environment Facility (GEF) • Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
AIACC Objectives • Advance scientific understanding • Of climate change I, A & V in developing country regions. • Build and enhance scientific & technical capacity • In developing countries to investigate I, A & V and participate in international scientific assessments. • Generate and communicate information • Useful for adaptation planning and action and for preparation of National Communications under UNFCCC.
AIACC Activities • Peer reviewed grants for regional studies • Project development & training workshops • Regional workshops • Thematic workshops • Ongoing technical support & mentoring • Facilitation of peer review publication • Synthesis
AIACC Regional Studies Highly Heterogeneous • Not a research program with specific objectives, approaches, scenarios, models dictated from above • Different objectives determine relative emphases of I, A, & V in the regional studies • Objectives drive choices of approaches, methods, models, scenarios • Choices are made by the regional study PIs and their teams
Commonalities among regional studies • All studies contribute to broad objectives of AIACC • Advance scientific understanding of I,A, & V • Build scientific/technical capacity • Generate & communicate information for adaptation • Each study addresses adaptation • Was a requirement in grant review & approval • Most studies incorporate stakeholder participation
Vulnerability vs. impact assessment • Priority given to adaptation in AIACC, leading to emphasis on vulnerability in many of the studies • Vulnerability: capacity to be harmed by a hazard (e.g. climate change)
Two aspects of vulnerability • Exposure to a hazard or set of hazards • Capacity of exposed individual, community, system to • Anticipate • Cope with, • Resist and • Recover from impacts of the hazard(s)
Impact Assessment • Tends to focus on exposure • Careful attention to scenarios of climate change that characterize the hazards to which people/systems will be exposed. • Capacities of people/systems not emphasized • Often simplistic, ad hoc treatment • Impact studies beginning to use multiple socioeconomic scenarios to address
Vulnerability Assessment • Focuses on capacities of people, communities, systems that determine impacts of exposures • identify factors, processes that enhance or degrade capacities • Shed light on effective adaptation • Hazard exposure often characterized by incremental scenarios • Informed by GCM, RCM projections
Common Ground for V & I Analyses • VA needed to provide more sophisticated understanding & representation of • Capacities of people, communities, systems • Adaptation processes and effectiveness • Dimensions of the hazard that matter most • Impact models can integrate info about capacities with “predicted” exposures • Quantitative estimates of impacts for different scenarios of capacities and exposures • Quantitative risk analysis
AIACC Synthesis • Regional studies are expected to be completed by end of 2004. • How can we synthesize work of 23 studies that • Ask different questions • Use different conceptual frameworks • Use different scenarios for climate, socioeconomic etc • Use different methods and models?
Mechanisms for synthesis • Regional workshops • Thematic synthesis workshops • Public web-based information network
AIACC Regional Workshops • Two rounds of regional workshops planned • Feb-Apr 2003 • Aug-Sept 2004 • Opportunity for study teams to • Present & discuss preliminary results with other researchers in their region • Share expertise, collaborate to solve common problems • Lay groundwork for synthesis
AIACC Regional Workshops • Develop broad cross-cutting questions on issues common to many individual studies • Distribute before 1st round of workshops, refine via list-serve discussion • Ask teams to address the questions in their presentations • Discuss commonalities, differences • Plan next steps • Repeat process for 2nd round of workshops • Same questions?
Thematic Synthesis Workshops* • Series of 3 or 4 small workshops in 2005 • Each to be focused on a cross-cutting question or theme • Price of admission: a paper on the theme • Objectives of each workshop • Present, discuss, revise individual papers • Write a joint synthesis paper • Publish individual & synthesis papers as package *Seeking financial support for these.
Web-based Information Network • AIACC regional study database • Ready access to information, data, results from each regional study • Electronic working paper series • Guided Web discussions • Develop, refine cross-cutting questions • Discussion of cross-cutting questions • Discussion of other issues (working papers, methods, models, data, training opportunities etc)
Illustrative cross-cutting questions • Are there spatial, demographic or other patterns to who is vulnerable? • What are the critical determinants of vulnerability to climate hazards now? Are they the same determinants for vulnerability to climate change in the future?
Illustrative cross-cutting questions • What trends are likely to diminish (enhance) future vulnerability to climatic hazards and climate change? • What policies or adaptation strategies can lessen long-term vulnerability to climate change and near-term vulnerability to climatic hazards?