90 likes | 202 Views
STC Roadmap Activity 1a: Work Plan Review Douglas Cripe – GEO Secretariat ST-09-01 Kick-off Brussels 27-30 July 2009. STC Objective. Ensure evolving GEO Work Plan scientifically and technologically sound and contributes to answering relevant questions in the SBAs.
E N D
STC RoadmapActivity 1a: Work Plan ReviewDouglas Cripe – GEO SecretariatST-09-01 Kick-offBrussels 27-30 July 2009
STC Objective • Ensure evolving GEO Work Plan scientifically and technologically sound and contributes to answering relevant questions in the SBAs. • To be achieved through a revolving scientific review of each Work Plan, starting with the current work plan for 2009-2011.
Outcome: Work Plan Assessment Report • WP AR to examine the outstanding questions and challenges in each of the SBAs. • AR may recommend changes to objectives and scope of existing Tasks or propose new Tasks to respond to any identified deficits or overlaps. • AR may also identify: • opportunities for cooperation between Tasks • suggest inclusion of specific activities from outside GEOSS • motivate the definition of new ones. • AR scope also includes reviewing the completeness of 9 SBAs.
Experts • AR needs to retain sufficient independence from the authors of WP. • AR to involve scientists and institutions of significant standing in the community. • Team of experts (one from each SBA) should coordinate review. • Experts involved in compiling the IGOS-P Theme Reports especially desired.
Timeline • AR should be completed in time for GEO Ministerial Summit in 2010. • STC to advise on the review effort and seek ways to support the work with dedicated funding from science foundations of member countries. • Action: Initiate Review Process for GEO Work Plan 2009-11. • Sub-Action [STC; now]: Identify Responsible team of experts or Task [possibly a new ST-Task]. • Sub-Action [team of experts; by 2009]: Identify main challenges/open questions within the SBAs that should be addressed by the S&T component of GEOSS. • Sub-Action [team of experts; by 2010]: Conduct Review. • Sub-Action [ST-09-01; now]: Seek ways to raise dedicated funding from science foundations of member countries for review work. • Action [STC; 2011]: Initiate Review Processes for future GEO Work Plan(s).
Thus far… Telecon 18 June 2009 • WP review should analyze what S&T elements are lacking in the Tasks of the GEO WP which could prevent these Tasks from accomplishing their objectives. • mapping of the objectives of the Tasks of WP against current Task contributions. The result of this type of review would be a list of missing S&T elements necessary for each Task to succeed. • The WP review should assess whether the Tasks in the current WP sufficiently address major scientific questions in those areas where EO able to make contributions. • independent examination of the WP wrt • quality of the work included • relevance for major scientific challenges • effectiveness of the Tasks in this context. • AR of the expected impact of the WP on science and technology.
But… • Distinct from Monitoring & Evaluation process • Distinct from periodic Technical Review of WP • open to all GEO, managed by WP Coordinator • Distinct from work of ST-09-01 and ST-09-02 • Key consideration: STC adds value through improved coordination between and within Tasks while ensuring they are as comprehensive as possible.
Next steps until 11th STC meeting • Iteration of draft ToR • Candidate experts to be identified