DASD (Plans)

1. UNCLASSIFIED DASD (Plans) Directorate for Interagency Planning and Assessments UNCLASSIFIED

2. Agenda • Organizational Structure • Portfolios • Summary • Discussion

3. Policy Organization USD (Policy) PDUSD (Policy) DUSD Policy Integration & CoS ASD Global Strategic Affairs ASD Homeland Def & America’s Security ASD SO/LIC & Interdpt Capabilities ASD Asia & Pacific Security Affairs DUSD Strategy, Plans, and Forces ASD International Security Affairs Enterprise Service DASD Homeland Security Integration DASD Special Ops Capabilities & CT DASD Detainee Policy DASD Counter WMD DASD Middle East DASD East Asia DASD Plans DASD Partnership Strategy & Stab Ops DASD African Affairs DASD South & Southeast Asia DASD Homeland Defense & DSCA DASD Nuclear & Missile Defense Policy DASD Force Development DASD POW/MIA DASD Crisis Mgmt & Mission Assurance DASD Space & Cyber Policy DASD Counternarcotics & Global Threats DPMO DASD Europe & NATO DASD Central Asia DASD Strategy DSCA DASD Russia & Eurasia DASD Western Hemisphere DTSA NATO

4. DASD Plans Organization USD (Policy) PDUSD (Policy) DUSD Policy Integration & CoS ASD Global Strategic Affairs ASD Homeland Def & America’s Security ASD SO/LIC & Interdpt Capabilities ASD Asia & Pacific Security Affairs DUSD Strategy, Plans, and Forces ASD International Security Affairs Enterprise Service Directorate for Interagency Planning & Assessments DASD Homeland Security Integration DASD Special Ops Capabilities & CT DASD Detainee Policy DASD Counter WMD DASD Middle East DASD East Asia DASD Plans Directorate for Global Force Planning DASD Partnership Strategy & Stab Ops DASD African Affairs DASD South & Southeast Asia DASD Homeland Defense & DSCA DASD Nuclear & Missile Defense Policy DASD Force Development DASD POW/MIA DASD Crisis Mgmt & Mission Assurance DASD Space & Cyber Policy DASD Counternarcotics & Global Threats DPMO DASD Europe & NATO DASD Central Asia DASD Strategy Directorate for Adaptive Planning DSCA DASD Russia & Eurasia DASD Western Hemisphere DTSA NATO

5. UNCLASSIFIED IAP&A: Core Mission Areas & Goals • Interagency Planning • Goal: Ensure DoD realizes the full benefits of input from other Departments/Agencies into DoD planning activities • Goal: Ensure DoD provides other Departments/Agencies effective support to their respective and/or USG collective planning efforts • Assessments • Goal: Improve DoD’s ability to assess campaign plan, campaign support plan, and supporting programs effectiveness • Goal: Link assessment process to strategy, planning, resourcing, and operational decision-making • Strategic Communication • Goal: Improve support to the development of campaign, campaign support, and contingency plans and planning process • Goal: Support development of strategic communication plans to support Global Force Posture Directorate UNCLASSIFIED

6. Summary • IAP&P is closely partnered with the Joint Staff • Mapping to provide situational awareness • IA collaboration is a valuable but finite resource that demands efficiencies within DoD • Efforts and input will inform the GEF review

7. Discussion • How do we prioritize / rationalize / link offers and requests for support? • Planning, training and exercising. • How are we compelling other Departments / Agencies to participate? • And using them properly when they do? • What training and exercise goals can translate into other Department / Agency desired deliverables? • Sharing outcomes, conclusions and final drafts? • Actual Department / Agency representation vs. contracted SMEs? • How do we ensure SME input is valid and accurate?

8. UNCLASSIFIED DASD (Plans) Directorate for Interagency Planning and Assessments UNCLASSIFIED

9. UNCLASSIFIED DASD (Plans) Back up slides UNCLASSIFIED

10. Interagency Planning Portfolio • Current Situation • Multiple interagency planning activities underway • Discrete / Stove-piped • Conducted in isolation, potentially duplicative • Missed opportunities – “whole of government”/ interdepartmental • Challenges • Differences in types of planning, terminology, culture • Capacity limitations (personnel, expertise, funding) • Overwhelmed/fatigued by volume of DoD requests/offers • Way ahead • Goal: improve the process / improve the plans • Catalogue current activity • Clarify requirements (supported / supporting) • Inform GEF re-write

11. Assessments Portfolio • Current Situation • GEF directs assessment of campaign plans (CP) and campaign support plans (CSP) • CP and CSP assessments intended to inform planning, programming, budget, and execution system (PPBES) • No specification of how this is to be achieved or standard • Challenges • Assessing effectiveness and establishing causation in CP environment difficult • PPBES processes operate on independent timelines • Limited staff and tools to conduct assessments • Way Ahead • Provide greater specificity of assessment guidance in GEF and JSCP • Evaluate implementation of guidance to establish best practices and refine methodology

12. Strategic Communication Portfolio • Current Situation • GEF directs integration of strategic communication throughout the planning process • GEF directs that strategic communication be leveraged in support of global force posture initiatives • Challenges • Lack of SC planning experience and capacity within DoD hinders effective planning, coordination, and oversight • No defined process for SC planning at strategic level with interagency partners • SC/IO concepts, lexicon, and planning standards not well defined and/or understood • Way Ahead • Consult with COCOMs/Services to assess demand signal for guidance/guidelines on SC • Support re-write of the GEF