1 / 23

b <1 Cryomodules & Cost Estimates

b <1 Cryomodules & Cost Estimates. Giorgio Apollinari March 15 th - 17 th , 2005. Outline. Description of the System Elliptical Cavities and CryoModules Spoke Cavities and Cryomodules R&D Steps Conclusions. “. PULSED RIA. ”. Single. Front End. Linac. Modulator. 3 MW. JPARC.

Download Presentation

b <1 Cryomodules & Cost Estimates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. b<1 Cryomodules & Cost Estimates Giorgio Apollinari March 15th - 17th , 2005

  2. Outline • Description of the System • Elliptical Cavities and CryoModules • Spoke Cavities and Cryomodules • R&D Steps • Conclusions

  3. PULSED RIA ” Single Front End Linac Modulator 3 MW JPARC Multi - Cavity Fanout at 10 - 50 kW/cavity Klystron Phase and Amplitude Control w/ Ferrite Tuners 325 MHz 0 - 110 MeV H - RFQ MEBT RTSR SSR DSR DSR b<1 “TESLA” LINAC 10 MW Modulator Modulator Modulator TESLA Multi - Beam Elliptical Option Elliptical Option Klystrons 1300 MHz 0.1 - 1.2 GeV 48 Cavites / Klystron 2 Klystrons ? b =.47 =.47 ? b =.47 =.47 b ? =.61 =.61 ? b =.61 =.61 b ? =.61 =.61 ? b =.61 =.61 b =.81 b =.81 b =.81 b =.81 b =.81 b =.81 96 Elliptical Cavities or or … … 325 MHz Spoke Resonators 325 MHz Spoke Resonators 8 Cavites / Cryomodule 12 Cryomodules Description of the System • Increase H- energy from E=15 MeV to E=1200 MeV. • Multiple geometrical b’s: 0.21, 0.4, ( 0.47, 0.61 for elliptical cavities or 0.61 for spoke cavities) and 0.81 • Parameter List V8 Cavity Accelerating Gradient (Elliptical Cavity Option for Beta=0.47 and 0.61) Epeak = 52 MV/m, Phi_Synch = -30 to -15 degrees 30 Accelerating Beta = 1.00 Gradient Eacc 25 Beta = 0.81 Eacc *TTF*Cos(f) Beta 20 =0.61 Gradient (MeV/m) Beta 0.47 15 10 5 0 1 51 101 151 201 251 301 351 Elliptical Cavity Number

  4. Description of the System • 5 (or 6) different cryomodules, ~10 m long. • Solenoidal and Quadrupole focusing. • Transition from 325 MHz to 1300 MHz • 110 or 400 MeV ? • Triple Spoke vs. Elliptical Cavities

  5. Technical Solutions • Spoke Cavities and CryoModules (see also K.Shepard talk) • Why Spokes • Fewer types& higher operating T (4 K) • Improved beam quality (increased longitudinal acceptance) • Superior mechanical stability for b<0.6 • Technology developed for RIA/APT

  6. Cryomodules b=0.21 16 Cavities/Cryomodule – 1 Cryomodule 16 focusing Solenoids/Cryomodule b=0.4 14 Cavities/Cryomodule – 2 Cryomodules 7 focusing Solenoids/Cryomodule Open Technical Choice b=0.61 6 Cavities/Cryomodule – 7 Cryomodules 6 focusing quads/Cryomodule

  7. Technical Solutions • Separate Vacuum • Efficient, top loading • Good alignment capability Positive Ion Injector Cryomodule

  8. ANL/RIA Cryomodule Design Clean Assembly suspended from Top Plate Clean Room String Assembly Assembly lowered in vacuum vessel

  9. Technical Solutions • FNAL idea for Spoke Cavities Cryostat

  10. Spoke Cavities Cryostats • Reality Checks • Following APT/RIA experience for: • Heat Loads • Microphonics/Vibration/Displacement problems • Alignment & Cold-down/Warm-up Displacement • R&D Efforts • Single and Double Spoke Cryostats Prototypes • Large numbers of Cavities & Focusing solenoids in single cryostat

  11. Elliptical b=0.47, 0.61, 0.81 • Cryostat based on TESLA design • 8 cavities, operating at 2K • Focusing cold quads • 9 quads in b=0.47 (40 T/m) • 5 quads in b=0.61 (33 T/m) • 3 quads in b=0.81 (5 T/m) • 1 quad in b=1 (3 T/m) • Expected Heat Loads • 5 W in 2 K • ~20 W in 4.5 K • ~200 W in 50 K

  12. Elliptical b=0.47, 0.61, 0.81 b=0.47 8 Cavities, 6 cells/cavity 9 focusing quads Open Technical Choice b=0.61 8 Cavities, 6 cells/cavity 5 focusing quads b=0.81 8 Cavities, 8 cells/cavity 3 focusing quads b=1.0 8 Cavities, 9 cells/cavity 1 focusing quad

  13. Elliptical b=0.47, 0.61, 0.81 • Build on FNAL/SNS/JLAB/MSU experience and collaboration to develop b<1 cavities.

  14. Cryomodule Cost exercise • Why ? • Provide “more realistic” inputs on cryomodule costs, including low quantities and prototype costs • Understand our preparedness to use “value engineering”. • How ? • Use un-modified existing drawing packages • INFN/DESY/TESLA for CryoIII and b=1 elliptical cavities • APT/RIA for modified Double Spokes Cavities • Submit Request For Quotations (RFQs) to various US and European companies for prototype (1), pre-production (4) and production (~50) quantities. • Focused on high-value items: • Elliptical Cavities, Cryostats, Double Spoke Cavities • Notable exception: Power Couplers for which we have an unsolicited V.I. From CPI • FY04 Dollars

  15. RFQ Responses

  16. RFQ Feedbacks

  17. Examples of RFQ Responses • b=1 Cavities • Cryostats

  18. Cost Estimate for b=1 Cryomodules • Approximately 55% of cost estimate based on RFQs • Most notable exception: Power Couplers (VI) • EE based on TESLA/SNS experience

  19. Total Cost Estimate • FY04 $

  20. Drawings “Americanization”

  21. Drawings “Americanization” • Knowledge and control of technical issues. • Allows for “value engineering”.

  22. R&D Timescale • Tasks • Build on ILC synergy to develop, design and prototype b<1 cryomodules • Starting points: TESLA, SNS, etc. • Develop, design and prototype Spoke Cavities Cryomodules • Milestones • Spoke Prototype Cryomodule by FY2006 • US-built Elliptical Cryomodule by FY2006

  23. CONCLUSIONS • PD Cold Linac is Technically feasible • PD Cold Linac is Financially feasible • The Risks are Understood • The R&D planned will Reduce the Risk • We have a Plan for what to do next

More Related