490 likes | 622 Views
ECE 135 Final Presentation The Three … aka. Pat Cleary with Kevin Parker & Bryan Chavez April 21 st , 2005. ECE 135 Final Presentation The VCSEL Kings … aka. Pat Cleary with Kevin Parker & Bryan Chavez April 21 st , 2005. ECE 135 Final Presentation RIO! … aka. Pat Cleary
E N D
ECE 135 Final PresentationThe Three … aka Pat Cleary with Kevin Parker & Bryan Chavez April 21st, 2005
ECE 135 Final PresentationThe VCSEL Kings … aka Pat Cleary with Kevin Parker & Bryan Chavez April 21st, 2005
ECE 135 Final PresentationRIO! … aka Pat Cleary with Kevin Parker & Bryan Chavez April 21st, 2005
ECE 135 Final Presentation BtrLaytDanNvr Pat Cleary with Kevin Parker & Bryan Chavez April 21st, 2005
IntroductionThe Goal: An IEEE 802.3 Standard Gigabit Ethernet LinkThe Components:Group and time management plan, background research, part selection, optical link budget, circuit design and layout, construction, and troubleshooting.
Background Research for Four-Corners Analysis • Eye safe limit → Pmax = 1 mW • From the 802.3 standard → extinction ratio = 9dB • Thus we see that Pmin = Pmax *10^(-9/10) • Pmin = .12589 mW
VCSEL Four Corner Analysis HFE439x-521
ROSA Selection HFD3180-108
Additional VCSEL Purchase LC-TOSA • 20 Free VCSELs Obtained
… And Immediate Correction • Soldered Output Pins in Correct Locations
Tx Test Board Performance • “Best” Eye Diagram • PRBS7 Pattern • Troubleshooting Necessary
Tx Test Board Troubleshooting Grand Conclusions • Outputs and Inputs Reversed • If one truly only learns through failure, we’ve learned a LOT already!
Tx Test Board Quality Control • Input in Input • Output in Output
Tx Test Board Performance • No attenuation • PRBS7 Pattern Still not successful
Tx Test Board Conclusions • Eye still not well defined • Potentiometer has minor effect on performance • Conclusion: Board permanently damaged from attempts to drive in reverse direction • Result: If continued testing is necessary a new board is needed
Completed Tx Test Board – Take 2 ← ← Outputs
Tx Test Board Performance 0 dB 10 dB ● PRBS7 Pattern ● 3 minute interval ● BER < 10^-9 (For > 0 dB) 70 dB
Tx Test Board Performance(Continued) ● 70 db ● AC coupled ● 70 db ● Scaled down using potentiometer
Tx Test Board (Take 2) Conclusions • Eye diagrams are very well-defined • Potentiometer scales the eye dramatically • Attenuation has minimal affect on eye • Low BER rate suggests quality performance • The Three are capable of building a working Tx board!
Tx & Rx Schematics Tx Rx
TxRx PCB Layout Agressive Conservative
Board 1A Troubleshooting • No Success with Tx or Rx • High-Pitched Noise and a Smoking Ferrite Bead… • Short Discovered Between Power Supply and Ground (Not from Layout)
Board 1B Construction • The Three’s Tried-and-True Strategy: Start Over • Results: Nothing Breaks During Testing!!!!!
Board 1B Troubleshooting • Receiver Circuit Functions Perfetto • Continuing Issues with Tx
PRBS7 Pattern 9 dB BER < 10^-11 5 minute duration Proper operation verified! Yay Rx Results
Board 1B Transmitter Testing • Left and Right Inputs to VCSEL • Signals Want to Be Eyes… Not Quite There • VCSEL Not Lasing • An Attempt at Board 1Γ Tx Also Unsuccessful
Aggressive Tx Modifications • Soldered all passives super carefully • Used a 25k potentiometer to modulate Ibias instead of 1k potentiometer • Adjusted the VCSEL orientation for forward-biasing • Adjusted pot values to safe levels before testing
Aggressive Tx Probing Laser Driver Inputs Laser Driver Outputs Data - Data - Data + Data +
Aggressive Tx Results • LASING!!!! • Adjusting Imod and Ibias showed improved results
Aggressive Tx Results (cont.) Working!!!!!!!!
Loopback Testing for Aggressive Design • PRBS7 Pattern • 7 dB Attenuation • Super Yay • Too Good to Be True? ….
Not This Time! • Signal at 8 dB Attenuation is Lower Quality…As Expected • BER < 0.0E-10 • Removal of an Optical Fiber Produces a Lost Signal • Verified Successful Completion of Gigabit Ethernet