130 likes | 272 Views
Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions by Developing Country Parties. Overview of the Agreed O utcome Pursuant to Bali Action Plan and status of participation by developing countries. Outline. Background. Overview of the agreed outcome. MRV framework.
E N D
Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions by Developing Country Parties Overview of the Agreed Outcome Pursuant to Bali Action Plan and status of participation by developing countries William Kojo Agyemang-Bonsu, Manager, Non-Annex I Support sub-programme, Mitigation, Data and Analysis Programme
Overview of the agreed outcome MRV framework
Overview of the agreed outcome: Reporting (I) • National communications every four years • Biennial update reports (BUR) • Guidelines adopted by the COP at its 17th session – Annex III to decision 2/CP.17 • First round of BUR to be submitted developing countries by December 2014, with flexibility for SIDS and LDCs • International Consultations and Analysis • Non-intrusive, non-punitive and respectful of national sovereignty • Aim to increase the transparency of mitigation actions and their effects • To be conducted as workshops for facilitative exchange of views under the SBI, open to all Parties • First rounds of ICA will be conducted commencing within 6 months of the submission of first round of BURs – June 2015 • Modalities and guidelines adopted by the COP at 17th session – Annex IV to decision 2/CP.17
Overview of the agreed outcome: Reporting (II) Follow up work under the Subsidiary bodies • Guidelines for domestic MRV is being developed by the SBSTA • Composition, modalities and procedures of the team of technical experts (to undertake the analysis of the BURs from developing countries) is being developed by the SBI
Overview of the agreed outcome: NAMAs Developing country Parties will take NAMAs in the context of sustainable development, supported and enabled by technology, financing and capacity-building, aimed at achieving a deviation in emissions relative to ‘business as usual’ emissions in 2020
Overview of the agreed outcome: NAMAs • Two avenues for work on NAMAs by developing countries: • Decision 1/CP.16, para. 50 (open invitation): • Compilation of NAMAs (FCCC/SBI/2013/INF.12/Rev.2) • SBI work programme on NAMAs for 2013-2014 • Registry (individual NAMAs) • Recording of NAMAs seeking international support • Recording of individual NAMAs for recognition • Recording support available/provided • Facilitate matching of the actions with support • Prototype of the registry was deployed in April 2013 • Functional registry (dynamic web-based) version which open to the public was also deployed 16 October 2013.
Overview of FCCC/SBI/2013/INF.12/Rev.2 • Contains the following NAMAs: • From FCCC/AWGLCA/2011/INF.1 • From FCCC/AWGLCA/2012/MISC.2 and Add.1 • NAMAs communicated by Burkina Faso, Dominican Republic, Gambia, Guinea, Kyrgyzstan and Cook Islands.
Overview of FCCC/SBI/2013/INF.12/Rev.2 • 57 Parties and the African Group have submitted NAMAs, corresponding to approximately 37.5% of all developing countries. The global break down in absolute numbers and in percent by region is:
Overview of FCCC/SBI/2013/INF.12/Rev.2 • Participation at regional level (approximately)
Overview of FCCC/SBI/2013/INF.12/Rev.2 • Characteristics of NAMAs: • National goals and strategies: 35.1 % • Sectoral policies and/or programmes: 17.5% • Lists of projects: 38.6% • Other: 8.7: