700 likes | 1.03k Views
Introduction to ECR Europe and Shrinkage. Adrian Beck Reader in Criminology University of Leicester , UK. ECR South Africa, February 2006. ECR Europe Shrinkage Group. Established in 1999 Made up of retailers, manufacturers and academics. The ECR Shrinkage Project Team.
E N D
Introduction to ECR Europe and Shrinkage Adrian BeckReader in CriminologyUniversity of Leicester, UK ECR South Africa, February 2006
ECR Europe Shrinkage Group • Established in 1999 • Made up of retailers, manufacturers and academics
Purpose of ECR Shrinkage Group • Raise awareness of the problem of shrinkage • Co-ordinate and sponsor cutting edge research • Encourage companies to address the problem • Promote a more systematic and systemic approach to dealing with the problem (the ECR Shrinkage Road Map)
Guiding Principles • Engage senior management and prioritise shrinkage: it is a consumer problem • Choice and ranges restricted • High margin products not listed • Products get locked up • Consumers frustrated • Shelves go Empty • New item impact reduced • Consumers switch stores or brands • Lower consumption
Guiding Principles • Engage senior management and prioritise shrinkage • Identify accountabilities, measure, monitor and motivate
Identify accountabilities, measure, monitor and motivate • End to end accountability • From store and product design to reverse logistics • Data accessibility, timeliness and granularity • Mining the data warehouse • Monitor and generate transparency • Stock counting • Process audits • Incentivise staff • Retailers with incentive schemes had lower levels of shrinkage
10p report Cashier error? Data mining... 14,836,947 products £12,000,000 shrinkage
Guiding Principles • Engage senior management and prioritise shrinkage • Identify accountabilities, measure, monitor and motivate • Promote inter and intra company collaboration
Who needs to be involved? • Manufacturer • Design team • Production • Supply Chain • Marketing • Sales • Retailer • Buyer/Merchandising • Loss Prevention • Supply Chain • Store Operations • Environmental agency
End to End Solutions Before After
Guiding Principles • Engage senior management and prioritise shrinkage • Identify accountabilities, measure, monitor and motivate • Promote inter and intra company collaboration • Adopt a systemic and systematic approach
Wake Up Call! ECR Shrinkage Road Map CORPORATE POLICY Evaluate Plan Implement Map & Measure Develop Solutions Analyse
Guiding Principles • Engage senior management and prioritise shrinkage • Identify accountabilities, measure, monitor and motivate • Promote inter and intra company collaboration • Adopt a systemic and systematic approach • Unlock the value of the 'hot' concept
The Hot Concept • Hot concept • Products • Places • People • Processes Places People Products Processes
Guiding Principles • Engage senior management and prioritise shrinkage • Identify accountabilities, measure, monitor and motivate • Promote inter and intra company collaboration • Adopt a systemic and systematic approach • Unlock the value of the 'hot' concept • Focus on process failures first
Focus on Process Failures First • Removes opportunity • Receipt process • Returns • Masks malicious activity • Delivers • Quick wins • Cost effective wins • Sustainable solutions
Guiding Principles • Engage senior management and prioritise shrinkage • Identify accountabilities, measure, monitor and motivate • Promote inter and intra company collaboration • Adopt a systemic and systematic approach • Unlock the value of the 'hot' concept • Focus on process failures first • Encourage innovation and experimentation
Encourage innovation and experimentation • Keep ahead of the game • Initiate……. • Pilot Studies on new ideas • Road Map projects with suppliers • Benchmarking against industry surveys • Experiment….. • New solutions • New store layouts • ECR survey showed that retailers who innovated and experimented most had 20% lower shrinkage
Guiding Principles • Engage senior management and prioritise shrinkage • Identify accountabilities, measure, monitor and motivate • Promote inter and intra company collaboration • Adopt a systemic and systematic approach • Unlock the value of the 'hot' concept • Focus on process failures first • Encourage innovation and experimentation • Document learning and disseminate success
The ECR Europe 2004 Shrinkage Survey Adrian BeckReader in CriminologyUniversity of Leicester, UK ECR South Africa, February 2006
Shrinkage Process failures Inter- company fraud Internal theft External theft Defining Shrinkage
What Does Shrinkage Mean? • Deliberate Under/Over Delivery • Invoice Errors • Quality and Weight of Items Inter-Company Fraud • Inventory Errors Promotion Errors • Pricing Errors Stock Going Out of Date • Damage to Stock Product Delivery/Scanning Errors Process Failures • Theft of Stock and Cash • ‘Grazing’ • Collusion Internal Theft • Shoplifting Till Snatches • Returning Stolen Goods Burglary • ‘Grazing’ External Theft
NONMALICIOUS MALICIOUS What Does Shrinkage Mean? Inter Company Fraud Internal Theft External Theft Process Failures Degree of Intent Probing Systems Exploiting Loopholes Mistakes Poor Planning Bad Management
Background and Methodology • Last survey in 1999 • Need for a new benchmark • Stock loss calculated at retail prices
Background and Methodology • 26 countries surveyed (21 last survey) • 250 retail companies and 44 manufacturers/suppliers contacted • Total FMCG sector valued at over €1 trillion • Sample represents 13.7% of retail companies with a combined turnover of €137,214,920,000
Counting the Cost Total loss equates to €66 million per day
5 % Average Retailer Shrink Margin 4 % 1.84% 3 % Average Retailer Margin 4.83% 2 % Average Retailer Profit Margin 2.99% 1 % 0% Current Potential Retailer’s Missed Profit Opportunity 62% Margin Growth
Shareholder Value Calculated by the Cranfield School of Management based upon the following assumptions Sales Margin = 15%; Inventory Holding Costs = 20%; Net Overhead Cost = 30%; Share Price is a Multiple of 20 on Net Income.
Shareholder Value Calculated by the Cranfield School of Management based upon the following assumptions Sales Margin = 15%; Inventory Holding Costs = 20%; Net Overhead Cost = 30%; Share Price is a Multiple of 20 on Net Income.
Shareholder Value Calculated by the Cranfield School of Management based upon the following assumptions Sales Margin = 15%; Inventory Holding Costs = 20%; Net Overhead Cost = 30%; Share Price is a Multiple of 20 on Net Income.
Shrinkage Retail Iceberg 49% Unknown Loss €9.5 billion 51%
Impact of the Iceberg • Lack of visibility • Lack of awareness • When did it happen? • Where did it happen? • How did it happen? • Who was responsible? • Lack of accountability • Prioritisation of the most visible/acceptable
24% Manufacturer Distribution 5% Retail Distribution 71% Retail Stores €5.7 Billion €1.2 Billion €17.3 Billion TOTAL€24.2 Billion + + = Location of the Problem
Other Survey Highlights • Companies with a corporate policy • Companies that prioritised stock loss • Companies that provided bonuses for good stock loss results • Companies with higher levels on inter-company co-operation • Companies that carried out a greater number of shrink reduction projects….. … All had lower levels of stock loss
For a free copy of the final report email: bna@le.ac.uk
Exploring Risk: The ‘Hot’ Concept Adrian Beck Reader in Criminology University of Leicester ECR South Africa, February 2006
Background • Risk is not evenly distributed. It is focussed on particular products, places, people, processes • Crime hot spots 3% of locations in some cities account for 50% of recorded crime • Hot products Some products much more at risk than others
What Causes Products to be Hot? Concealable Removable Available Valuable Enjoyable Disposable
Background • Supply chain hot spots Risk exists at particular points, e.g. delivery to store • Hot People • Marginalised, unmonitored, temporary, known offenders