90 likes | 108 Views
Session Recording Protocol Requirements and Charter. IETF 76, Hiroshima Andy Hutton and Leon Portman on behalf of the team. Draft authors: Kenneth Rehor, Rajnish Jain, Leon Portman, Andrew Hutton, Vijay Gurbani, Hadriel Kaplan. Some use cases for recording. Trading floor compliance
E N D
Session Recording Protocol Requirements and Charter IETF 76, Hiroshima Andy Hutton and Leon Portman on behalf of the team Draft authors: Kenneth Rehor, Rajnish Jain, Leon Portman, Andrew Hutton, Vijay Gurbani, Hadriel Kaplan
Some use cases for recording • Trading floor compliance • Contact Center quality management • Customer analytics • Financial institution transactions • Insurance and healthcare regulations • Emergency services regulations In many cases it’s not a legal requirement, it’s a user requirement – users wanting to protect themselves (i.e., non-repudiation)
Goals • Managing delivery of media from a communication system to a recording device • Replace proprietary and incompatible mechanisms • Reduce complexity and cost • Accelerate adoption of SIP-based solutions in the enterprises
Problem Statement • Unique requirements that are not addressed in the current SIP protocol specifications • Some examples • Distinction between the session that is being recorded and recording session • Ability to indicate recording session (RAVEN) • Ability to disable recording session (RAVEN) • Recording Metadata Definition and Delivery
Charter Proposal • The scope of the activity includes: • Recorder Control (Session Initiation) • Session metadata content and format • Security mechanisms, including transport and media encryption • Negotiation of recording media streams (E.g. Mixed or Not Mixed). • The group will produce: • Updated Requirements, Use Cases, Architecture draft • Specification for a Session Recording Protocol (i.e. SIP extensions) • Timeline: • Apr 2010 Requirements, Use Cases, Architecture to IESG as Informational Draft • Nov 2010 Submit protocol draft to IESG as standards track