290 likes | 501 Views
IBM Workshop in Honolulu. Seismological studies on mantle upwelling in NE Japan: Implications for the genesis of arc magmas. Junichi Nakajima & Akira Hasegawa Research Center for Prediction of Earthquakes & Volcanic Eruptions Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, JAPAN.
E N D
IBM Workshop in Honolulu Seismological studies on mantle upwelling in NE Japan:Implications for the genesis of arc magmas Junichi Nakajima & Akira Hasegawa Research Center for Prediction of Earthquakes & Volcanic Eruptions Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, JAPAN November 8, 2007
Outline Miller et al. (2006) • Review previous results on mantle-wedge structure in 2000’s and their interpretations. • Introduce recent (preliminary) results of velocity structure in Tohoku and Hokkaido Study area
Seismological observations in 1990’s Seismology Hasegawa et al. [1991] Zhao et al., [1992-1994] Hasegawa et al. [1991] Zhao et al. [1992]
Seismic tomography study - Eqs. and stations (Nakajima et al., 2001, JGR) • 169,712 P-wave arrivals & 103,993 S-wave arrivals • Method : Zhao et al. [1992, JGR] • Grid separation: 15-25 km in both horizontal and vertical directions Neqs. = 4338
Inclined low-Vs zones in mantle wedge Inclined low-V zone ~50 km above the slab Velocity reductions of 4-6 % in Vp and 6-10 % in Vs Pacific plate Low-F event Volcano Nakajima et al. [2001]
Velocity structure at a 40 km depth (below the Moho) dVp dVs Vp/Vs Nakajima et al. JGR, [2001]
Flow pattern (wedge) (Eberle et al., PEPI, 2002) Numerical simulation Flow pattern Upward flow (high-T) is generated in the mantle wedge. Karato [1993, GRL] Predicted low-V zone is consistent with the observation. Inclined low-V zone = upwelling flow induced by slab subduction
Question What causes an inclined low-velocity zone ? - thermal heterogeneity? - melts? - chemical heterogeneity?
Qp structure in NE Japan (Tsumura et al., 2000)
Conversion from Qp to Temperature[Nakajima and Hasegawa, GRL, 2003] Simple relationship between Q, temperature, pressure and frequency [e.g., Karato, 2004] ( f: frequency [Hz],P: pressure [GPa], T: temperature[K], H*: activation enthalpy [kJ/mol]) Given T0, P0 and Q0 as reference values…. References T0:1025℃ (40 km depth) [Kushiro, 1987] Q0-1= 0.0035 [Tsumura et al., 2000] a=0.20, H*(P)=500 + 16×P kJ/mol, H0*=500 kJ/mol [Karato, 2004]
Thermal structure[Nakajima and Hasegawa, GRL, 2003] Wet solidus of peridotite
Correction of thermal effect Observed low-velocity anomalies -> 4-6 % in Vp and 6-10 % in Vs Expected velocity reductions from thermal anomalies -> 1-2 % in Vp and 2-3 % in Vs Residuals of velocity anomalies -> -dlnVp=0.03-0.04 -dlnVs=0.04-0.07 dlnVp/dlnVs = 1~2 Karato (1993)
Takei’s model (Takei, JGR, 2002) dlnVs/dlnVp (Velocity reduction rate) physical properties of fluids Aspect ratio(α) Volume fraction from dlnVs(φ) Takei (2002)
Melt distribution in low-V zone Nakajima, Takei and Hasegawa (2005, EPSL) Partial melting with fractions of 0.3-5 vol% in low-V zone.
Interpretation of depth variation in pore shapes Accumulation below Moho? dike/crack Migration? dike/crack Generation? Depth variation in aspect ratio of melt-filled pores
Which direction does mantle upwelling flow? Seismic velocity/attenuation structures are the present-day snap shot and do not provide the direction of mantle flow. Shear-wave splitting could provide an important and independent information on mantle dynamics.
(Nakajima and Hasegawa, EPSL, 2004) Results of shear-wave splitting Assuming A-type olivine in back arc, flow direction is inferred to be EW.
A model of return flow in NE Japan Hasegawa & Nakajima (2004)
Summary • An inclined-low-velocity zone in the mantle wedge sub-parallel to the slab • Temperatures in the mantle wedge of 1000-1300 C • Depth variation in aspect ratio of melt-filled pores and melt fractions of 0.05-5 vol% in the low-velocity zone • Flow direction parallel to the slab dip
Kawakatsu & Watada (2007) Recent tomographic results in NE Japan @ Update previous results by Nakajima et al. (2001) @ Obtain clearer images of inclined low-velocity zone @ Understand whole fluid circulation
Comparison with Nakajima et al. (2001) This study Nakajima et al. (2001) dVp dVs Central part of Tohoku
Results dVs dVp Sheet-like low-velocity zone Larger velocity reductions in S wave than P wave (-dlnVp=3-6%, -dlnVs=5-10%) Thickness of low-velocity zone of 10-30 km with an along-arc variation (seems to be thinner in C and D)
Low-velocity zone beneath back-arc volcanoes Diapirs from the upwelling?
Path of fluids from slab to mantle Low-V zone at a dept of 150 km -> Supply of fluids from slab to mantle?
Summary of recent results 4 5 1: Low-velocity zone corresponding to oceanic crust down to a depth of 100 km (Tsuji et al., unpublished). 2~3: Low-velocity zone at a depth of ~150 km. Supply of fluids to mantle there? 3~4: Sheet-like low-velocity zone -dlnVs > -dlnVp. Thickness of 10-30 km with along-arc variation 5: Segregated diapirs from upwelling?. Source of magmas of back-arc volcanoes? 1 3 2
Low-velocity zone in mantle wedge Inclined low-V zone (from back-arc to the VF) Hasegawa and Nakajima (2004), AGU Geophys. Monog. NE Japan:Zhao et al. (1992), Nakajima et al. (2001) Alaska & Aleutian:Abers (1994), Zhao et al. (1995) Kamchatka:Gorbatov et al. (1999) Tonga:Zhao et al. (1997) After 2004 Hokkaido:Wang and Zhao (2006) Kyushu:Wang and Zhao (2006) New Zealand:Reyners et al. (2006) Alaska:Eberhart-Phillips et al. (2006) Tonga:Conder and Wiens (2006) Is inclined low-V zone a common feature in subduction zones?