190 likes | 338 Views
Proposed Revisions to the EEP Schedule of Fees for Streams and Wetlands September 13, 2006. Presentation Outline Background Supporting Data Proposed Revisions Revision Timeline Advance Outreach. Background.
E N D
Proposed Revisions to the EEP Schedule of Fees for Streams and Wetlands September 13, 2006
Presentation Outline • Background • Supporting Data • Proposed Revisions • Revision Timeline • Advance Outreach
Background • EEP operates an in-lieu fee program to provide an option in NC for meeting mitigation requirements • Since 1998 EEP has accepted 581 payments from a variety of clients • 86% from private entities/companies • 14% from government agencies (excluding DOT) • EEP is required to annually evaluate actual project costs and adjust fees as necessary
Background continued • Last fee revision occurred in 2003 • Increased stream fee • Added annual adjustment for inflation • In last two years, EEP has developed many projects that provide the most data ever related to restoration costs • DBB projects in monitoring phase • FD contracts awarded • Latest data analyses reveal need for revision
Supporting Data • Analysis of 44 DBB Stream Projects • UNC-W/Clemson • Assessment of per unit costs of full-delivery projects • Wetlands and streams • Coastal land cost assessment • State Property Office
UNC-W/Clemson Cost Study • Inventory Project Costs • Develop Analysis Tool • Predict expenses of individual projects • Forecast total cost of coming year’s projects • Assist in determining fee schedule
Project Cost Components • EEP Administration • Land Acquisition • Design/Engineering • Construction • Construction Management • Monitoring • Stewardship
Typical Project Expenditure Over Time • 1st Year 24.50% • 2nd Year 66.45% • 3rd Year 5.70% • 4th Year 0.70% • 5th Year 0.70% • 6th Year 0.70% • 7th Year 1.25% 90.95% 9.5%
Cost of Stream Restoration • Differentiation of Developing-Urban vs. Rural projects • EEP DBB stream project costs were normalized (current cost of living) and averaged • Average Cost - $242/ft • Rural Cost - $204/ft • Developing-Urban Cost - $332/ft • EEP FD stream project costs normalized and averaged (61 projects) • Average Cost - $264/ft • Rural Cost - $259/ft • Developing-Urban costs - $268/ft
Cost of Wetland Restoration • Normalized (current cost of living) for all wetland FD projects and averaged • Riparian Wetland (28 projects) • Developing-Urban-$56,000/ac • Rural-$32,000/ac • Non-Riparian Wetland (15 projects) • Developing-Urban-$21,000/ac • Rural-$21,000/ac (no difference)
Accounting for Coastal Land Costs in Stream and Wetland Fees • Evaluated average cost of land acquired by SPO in 20 coastal counties • Stream: $6,800/acre • Non-riparian Wetland: $3,800/acre • Riparian Wetland: $7,800/acre • Removed land cost from stream and wetland cost data for rural projects and applied coastal land cost to derive recommended fee
Proposed Revisions • Establish three fee categories • Developing-Urban (to reflect complexities of restoration in urban and developing areas) • Coastal (to reflect escalating land costs in coastal part of NC) • Rural (to maintain a base fee for remaining parts of the state) • Define categories geographically based on county boundaries
Category Definitions • Urban counties were originally defined by evaluating MPO boundaries • It has been suggested that we consider urban areas as defined pursuant to Phase II stormwater rules • Coastal counties were defined based on the presence of waterfront properties
Advance Outreach • Letters (>500) sent out to ILF clients, interested parties and Liaison Council members • Presented proposals to the PACG and PACG-TC • Held meeting for interested parties on September 8th
Requesting permission to proceed to the November EMC asking to initiate rule-making through Notice of Text and Hearing. Slight modifications to proposal may be made prior to presentation to EMC.