1 / 24

DE-ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT AMONG DIVISION I ATHLETIC DEPARTMENTS

DE-ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT AMONG DIVISION I ATHLETIC DEPARTMENTS. Adrien Bouchet | Michael Hutchinson. Introduction. Division I Intercollegiate Athletics Value of Persistence

dmartindale
Download Presentation

DE-ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT AMONG DIVISION I ATHLETIC DEPARTMENTS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DE-ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT AMONG DIVISION I ATHLETIC DEPARTMENTS Adrien Bouchet | Michael Hutchinson

  2. Introduction Division I Intercollegiate Athletics Value of Persistence An individual purchased a stock at $50 a share, but the price has gone down to $20. Still, convinced about the merit of the stock, he buys more shares at this lower price. Soon the price declines further and the individual is again faced with the decision to buy more, hold what he already has, or sell out entirely. - Staw, 1981, p. 577 Escalation of Commitment Permanently Failing Organization De-escalation of CommitmentRedirection

  3. Introduction How – De-escalation – Scope and Purpose

  4. Procedure Collective Case Study 10 years | 2003-2012* Qualitative Method Interviews | Documents *Excluding Removal (FBS | I-A)

  5. Procedure

  6. Audio-taping Procedure Transcription Audio-taping Triangulation Peer Debriefing Member Checking Intercoder Reliability

  7. Findings

  8. Findings

  9. Findings

  10. Findings

  11. Findings

  12. Findings

  13. Findings

  14. Findings

  15. Findings

  16. Findings

  17. Findings

  18. Findings

  19. Findings

  20. Findings

  21. Findings

  22. Implications Practical Applications* Absence of Negative Feedback Reframing the Problem Limited Stakeholder Involvement Implementation of Task Force Impression Management: Personal | Institution Stakeholder Placation Distraction *Case specific

  23. Final Takeaway - Winner (2006)

  24. Feedback and Questions Adrien Bouchet University of Tulsa adrien-bouchet@utulsa.edu Michael Hutchinson University of Memphis michael.hutchinson@memphis.edu

More Related