1 / 33

Material irradiation tests meeting R2M, a spin-off from R2E

Material irradiation tests meeting R2M, a spin-off from R2E. Indico 639798 Elisa Guillermain elisa.guillermain@cern.ch. Meeting Agenda. Meeting introduction Why and how to perform irradiation tests on materials ? Sum up of last year meeting Indico 538951

dmccormick
Download Presentation

Material irradiation tests meeting R2M, a spin-off from R2E

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Material irradiation tests meetingR2M, a spin-off from R2E Indico 639798 Elisa Guillermain elisa.guillermain@cern.ch

  2. Meeting Agenda • Meeting introduction • Why and how to perform irradiation tests on materials ? • Sum up of last year meeting Indico 538951 • TID irradiation tests performed in 2016-2017 • Invited speakers • Tests of beam-intercepting devices, Elvis Fornasiere (EN-STI-TCD) • Irradiation tests of stripping foil control elements, Pieter Van Trappen (TE-ABT-EC) • TE-VSC irradiation tests, Pawel Wojciech Krakowski (TE-VSC-ICM) • Irradiation test of cooling liquids, Petr Gorbounov (EP-UAT) • Irradiation test of Piezos, Mark Butcher and Pablo Serrano Galvez (EN-STI-ECE) • Meeting conclusions • Documentation and archiving • Future tests

  3. Material irradiation tests meetingMeeting Introduction Elisa Guillermain elisa.guillermain@cern.ch

  4. Radiation and materials • "Material" = full equipment, system or components, parts, bulk material, etc… • NOT beam intercepting devices • Subject to high fluencies and high displacement damage. • NOT electronics devices or components • Different radiation effects (single events) and different approaches for irradiation testing • Material radiation damage = Cumulative effects: • TID – Total ionizing dose • Modification of molecular bonds due to energy deposition • DD – Displacement damage (particle radiation only) • Atoms displacement within the material

  5. Why R2M becomes more and more critical ? • In the LHC -> HL-LHC • Intensity increase, 25 ns operation (was 50 ns) • Now higher beam gas interactions • Ion runs has high impact on TID • Expected radiation level for 2017 are ~10x higher than 2015

  6. Dose in the LHC BLM data Data for p-p 25 ns operation https://indico.cern.ch/event/632426/ Corinna Martinella (MCWG)

  7. Dose in the injectors • Intensity increase as well • Situation can be worst than in LHC • Cumulative effects • Old installations • Example of SPS • see EDMS1739976 • Luminosity and intensity increase • Increasing accumulated doses • More and more location and equipment concerned

  8. Consequences of radiation damage • Material damage can lead to : • Beam dumps (Machine reliability) • Downtime for unforeseen maintenance (Machine availability) • Heavy maintenance (YETS, LS) : ALARA, costs, etc… • Radiation resistance often depends on exact composition of material • Can be decades of difference in same material families • Aim is to chose the best resistant among available possibilities • Purpose of irradiation tests of materials • Estimate the equipment lifetime at a specific position • Ensure the RELIABILITY of installed equipment • Reduce machine downtime • Respect ALARA principles • Save time and money

  9. Role of the support team • Tests Coordination • Irradiation test scheduling and follow up • Combination of campaigns to perform together – saves money • Centralize the collaboration with external facilities • Contractual aspects • Clear overview of future tests for ensuring appropriate contracts volumes ! • Support for test preparation • To equipment groups and to service groups for assessing the radiation resistance of equipment to be installed in harsh environment. • Help for irradiation tests preparation • Administrative support • Documentation • Need for a responsible for each irradiation test project

  10. Irradiation tests preparation and WorkFlow • Irradiation test preparation • Identify the needs : • What needs to be tested ?Up to which dose ? How to characterize ? • Irradiation conditions and choice of the irradiation facility • Technical Specification • See the technical specification template EDMS 1807333 • After the technical specification is written, reviewed, approved : • Administrative aspects: Offer, order, invoicing • Irradiation performance and follow-up • Documentation : Reporting and Archive • Technical specification useful for all aspects • R2E team support at all steps ! • Profit from previous experience • More info from last year meeting on Indico 538951

  11. 2016-2017 irradiation tests on materials

  12. Irradiation tests at Fraunhofer • 61 CERN project managed by Fraunhofer from 2012 to 2016 • Both active tests at Fraunhofer and passive tests at BGS • All information of irradiation tests performed at Fraunhofer are on the dedicated Twiki • https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/FraunhoferRadTests/WebHome • Includes • General information • Technical details of the facilities managed by Fraunhofer • Information for test preparation • List of irradiation tests performed / on-going / foreseen • Individual page for each project with corresponding documentation

  13. Recent irradiation tests at Fraunhofer In black: irradiation test performed In red: On-going irradiation tests Active tests at Fraunhofer in-house facilities Optical fibers test prepared and managed by Jeremy Blanc EN/EL Collaboration for administrative / contractual aspects

  14. Recent irradiation tests at Fraunhofer - BGS In black: irradiation test performed In red: On-going / ordered irradiation tests • BGS is a commercial irradiation facility (Not R&D) for passive tests • Advantage: • High dose rates allowing for reduced irradiation time • High volume available (pallet)

  15. Recent irradiation tests atIonisos • Not suitable for very high doses (1,5 months for 1 MGy) • Advantage: at driving distance, suitable for fragile samples or material subject to annealing

  16. Test plan • Simple test plan : • O’rings [NEO-16-002], Pawel Krakowski, TE/VSC • Samples are not put in the irradiation area all together to reduce the irradiated volume. • For ordering the irradiation at BGS: • Need to know the test plan as each step is to be ordered separately Irradiation time

  17. Test plan Dose steps to be defined for ordering procedure

  18. Test plan J+112 On top of irradiation time, delays occurs at each dose step !! Reduce the number of step = Reduce the campaign total duration

  19. Material irradiation tests meeting • Combination of irradiation campaigns / Test plan • Saves money • Reduce availability issues due to increasing number of tests • Needs to be prepared well ahead of time • Meeting continuation : Some examples • Tests of beam-intercepting devices, Elvis Fornasiere (EN-STI-TCD) • A different type of radiation damage ! • Irradiation tests of stripping foil control elements, Pieter Van Trappen (TE-ABT-EC) • TE-VSC irradiation tests, Pawel Wojciech Krakowski (TE-VSC-ICM) • Irradiation test of cooling liquids, Petr Gorbounov (EP-UAT) • Irradiation test of Piezos, Mark Butcher and Pablo Serrano Galvez (EN-STI-ECE)

  20. Material irradiation tests meetingMeeting conclusions Elisa Guillermain elisa.guillermain@cern.ch

  21. Documentation and archive • Documentation= Keep track of all aspect of the performed irradiation tests • Share knowledge and know-how, useful widely to the whole scientific community, as the Yellow books! • Documentation includes: • Test specification • Describe all aspects of the irradiation test, including desired conditions of the irradiation test • Useful as a working documents, for communication with the irradiation facility staff, and for CERN archiving • See template on EDMS1807333 • Irradiation report • Dosimetry, samples pictures, characterization tests if any from the contractor • In line with our requirements from the technical specification ! • CERN irradiation test report • Analysis and conclusion of characterization tests (suitability of equipment for installation ?) • Some CERN reports are missing ! I will send a request to get them… • If applicable, extensive campaigns report • All tobe archived in EDMS

  22. EDMS Archiving

  23. EDMS Archiving • Technical documents = • Technical specification • Irradiation test report • CERN irradiation test report • Can be linked to equipment group folder, or any other ! Naming convention to be defined ?

  24. Foreseen irradiation tests of materials

  25. Next combined campaigns at Fraunhofer • [NEO-16-002] – On-going • Up to 10 MGy • Started on 02.03.2017 • Foreseen end 22.06.2017 • [NEO-17-030] – Ordered • Up to 3 MGy • Increased volume • Will start when [NEO-16-002] is over • Foreseen end 09.2017 • [NEO-17-???] – under preparation • Up to 15 MGy most likely • Foreseen duration 5 months • Ends early 2018 Sprinkler heads Piezo passive Bake out Concrete GSM and TETRA components SPS Fire safety components Combination of 5 VSC projects + will include other tests

  26. Next testsFraunhofer

  27. Next irradiation tests at Ionisos

  28. New tests gathering • Why need to be aware of next tests ? • To prepare their combination / planning and save money • To prepare contractual aspects • Estimation of budgets • Cost estimate under approval • Draft technical specification for contract under review • Encouragement to the equipment groups to get in touch with the R2E support team for the foreseen tests • Encouragement to the equipment groups / section to identify a contact person as a responsible for irradiation tests of equipement

  29. Conclusion • Irradiation campaign shall be prepared well ahead of time • Preparation takes time • Technical specification as working document • Performance takes time • Characterization test and analysis takes time • Irradiation tests takes time to be performed • At 10kGy/h, 1MGy in 5 days and 10 MGy in 50 days • But 4 to 7 days in between each step ! • 10 MGy with 10 steps = almost 4 months • Coordination is important since only one pallet available for R&D at BGS • Ordering procedure for high dose tests : • Dose steps / test plan to be define well ahead of time • Workflow to be followed • First step is the technical specification

  30. Thanks for your attention And thanks to the speakers ! Any question is welcome

  31. Present situation – Irradiation tests

  32. Irradiation facilities

  33. Commercial gamma irradiation facilities • BGS in Wiehl, Germany • Pallet irradiation • 10 kGy/h, Large volume, 1MGy in 5 days • Fixed position • 30 kGy/h, Smaller volume, 1 MGy in 2 days • 100 MGy in 5 months • Also available, 1 kGy/h • Ionisos in Dagneux, Lyon • Fixed positions • 20 Gy/h to 1 kGy/h, 1 MGy in 45 days • Powering possible with long cabling distance (50m) • Driving distance • Fast pick up of samples post irradiation for annealing effects • Possibility for on-site characterization testing in between irradiation steps

More Related