440 likes | 626 Views
Megan Keck. Who Poisoned Buzz Lightyear?. Cooking Show Surprise. Woody and Buzz Lightyear host a cooking show, and wanted a guest star to be on an episode. Each auditioner had to prepare: A hot dog, a wrap for the hot dog, a drink, and a mystery white powder for dessert.
E N D
Megan Keck Who Poisoned Buzz Lightyear?
Cooking Show Surprise • Woody and Buzz Lightyear host a cooking show, and wanted a guest star to be on an episode. Each auditioner had to prepare: A hot dog, a wrap for the hot dog, a drink, and a mystery white powder for dessert. • One of the auditioners must have felt a little jealous of Buzz because he had his own show, so they poisoned him! He is currently in the hospital, and its up to you to figure out who did it!
Items left at the crime scene… • A piece of hot dog • 5 piles of white powder on the ground • Two pieces of bent metal on the ground (one in a circular shape, one in an ‘s’ shape) • 175 mL of clear liquid • An outline of Buzz, with his hands on his hips
Suspects… • A table was created that shows each suspect and what they prepared on the cooking show…
Hypothesis • If Prince Charming prepared salt water, an aluminum wrap, baking soda, and a fat free hot dog, then he poisoned Buzz, because the items he prepared appeared to match the items at the crime scene.
What to do • First, perform a series of tests to gather information about all of the properties of drinks, wraps, hot dogs, and powders. • Once all of the information is gathered, you will perform the same tests on the items left at the crime scene • You will then compare the results, and figure out who did it!
Materials- Drinks • To test for Color, Conductivity, Density, Optical Properties, Flammability, and Reactivity, you will need:
Materials- Wraps • To test for Malleability, Luster, Conductivity, Texture, and Reactivity, you will need:
Materials- powders • To test for Solubility, Flammability, Conductivity, Reactivity, and Melting, you will need:
Materials- Hot Dog • To test for Mass (pre-squeeze and post-squeeze), Density, Conductivity, and Reactivity, you will need:
Procedure- Drinks • Put a few drops of grape drink in your well plate • Record the color and optical properties of the drink (transparent, translucent, or opaque) • To test for conductivity, turn on the conductivity meter • Place the exposed ends of the conductivity meter into the liquid, making sure that the two metal pieces are not touching each other nor are they touching the bottom of the well plate. • The lights of the conductivity meter will glow which allows you to see how conductible the liquid is. • Use this chart to determine conductivity of the liquid:
Procedures- Drinks (continued) 7. Record the conductivity level of the grape drink 8. Dry the meter off and put it away 9. To measure density of the liquid, take a glass graduated cylinder and fill it with water up to 10 mL 10. Take a dropper and put 3 to 4 drops of grape drink in the water (do not use the grape drink from the well plate!). See if it sinks to the bottom of the graduated cylinder, or if it floats above the water (you might have to wait for a few minutes) 11. Record whether it floats or sinks in water 12. Dump out your graduated cylinder and put it away
Procedures- drinks (continued) 13. To test for reactivity, get out a plastic spoon and the sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) 14. Place a small amount of sodium bicarbonate in the grape drink that is already in your well plate. 15. Using the hand lens, observe what happens to the mixture 16. Record what happens 17. Dump out the drink that is in the well plate 18. To test for flammability, fill a glass beaker about a quarter full with the grape drink 19. Light a match and touch it to the drink 20. Record whether it catches on fire or not 21. Dump the grape drink out and throw the match away 22. Put the graduated cylinder away Repeat steps 1-22 with each of the other 5 drinks Baking Soda
Procedures- Wraps • Put a small piece of iron in a well plate • Record whether it is dull or shiny, and the texture. • Record whether it is very thin (malleable) or thick (nonmalleable) • To test for conductivity, get the conductivity meter and test its conductivity by placing the exposed ends of the conductivity meter onto the iron, making sure that the two metal pieces are not touching each other nor are they touching the bottom of the well plate. • See chart on slide 12 to determine conductivity level • Record the conductivity level
Procedures- wraps (continued) 7. To test for reactivity, get out the hydrochloric acid and dropper- CAUTION: HYDROCHLORIC ACID CAN EAT THROUGH SKIN AND BONE, AND IS DANGEROUS IF TOO MUCH IS INHALED OR DIGESTED. 8. Place a few drops of hydrochloric acid onto the iron and watch what happens using the hand lens 9. Record what happens to the iron 10. To get rid of the hydrochloric acid, get out your plastic container and fill it about a quarter full with baking soda 11. Pour the iron and the hydrochloric acid into the container (baking soda absorbs hydrochloric acid!) Repeat steps 1-11 with the other 5 wraps
Procedures- powders • Put a small spoonful of Baking soda into your well plate • To test for reactivity, using a dropper, put about three drops of vinegar onto the baking soda • Using the hand lens, watch what happens and record it • Dump out the baking soda mixture • To test for flammability, put a small spoonful of Baking soda into your well plate • Light a match and put it onto the baking soda, and record whether it catches on fire or not • Dump out your baking soda and throw away the match • Put your well plate away
Procedures- powder (cont.) 9. To test whether the powder will melt, turn on your burner and put a spoonful of baking soda onto a piece of aluminum foil; put the aluminum foil on the burner 10. Once the burner is hot, record if the baking soda melts or not 11. Turn off your burner and clean everything up During our experiment, while the Burner was heating up, we also tested for solubility. 12. To test for solubility, get the medium-sized beaker and fill it halfway with water 13. Pour a spoonful of baking soda into the water, and stir it with the glass stirrer for one minute 14. Record whether or not the baking soda dissolved in the water 15. To test the conductivity of the powder, we used the baking soda-water mixture used in the solubility test. 16. To test for conductivity, get the conductivity meter and test its conductivity by placing the exposed ends of the conductivity meter into the mixture, making sure that the two metal pieces are not touching each other nor are they touching the bottom of the beaker. 17. See chart on slide 12 to determine conductivity level 18. Record the conductivity level Repeat steps 1-18 with the other 4 powders, EXCEPT for SODIUM POLYACRYLATE
Exception: sodium polyacrylate Flammability and melting can be conducted the same way as the other powders, but, when testing reactivity, solubility and conductivity of sodium polyacrylate, put the sodium polyacrylate into a paper cup that you can throw away. DO NOT PUT SODIUM POLYACRYLATE DOWN THE SINK! Sodium Polyacrylate
Procedures: hot dog • Put a piece of pork hot dog into your well plate • To record the mass of the hot dog ‘pre-squeeze’, use a triple beam balance • Put the hot dog on the triple beam balance and measure the mass of your hot dog, then record. Clean off your triple beam balance, then put it away • To find the volume of the hot dog, take a plastic graduated cylinder, and fill it with 50 mL of water • Drop the hot dog into the water, and see how many mL the water raised. Subtract 50 mL from the new volume (water + hot dog), and you have the volume of the hot dog • Divide mass found in step 3 by volume found in step 5 and record the answer. This is your density. • Dump out your cylinder, but keep the hot dog. Put the cylinder away
Procedures- hot dog (continued) 8. To find out how much fat is in a hot dog, get out a paper towel, wrap it around the hot dog and squeeze the hot dog as much as you can 9. Keep all of the pieces of the hot dog on the paper towel Note: During our experiment, we tore the hot dog in half to make it easier to squeeze 10. To find the mass of the hot dog ‘post squeeze’, take the bits of hot dog off of the paper towel and find the mass of the pieces by using the triple beam balance as in step 3. Record the post squeeze mass. 11. Take the pieces off of the balance, and clean the balance. Put the hot dog parts into your well plate. 12. To test the conductivity of the hot dog - put the ends of the conductivity meter into the meat part of the hot dog, not the skin. Record conductivity level. See chart on slide 12. *Squish*
Procedures- hot dog (continued) 13. To test for reactivity, get out the iodine and a dropper 14. Put one or two drops of iodine on the hot dog (try to put the drops on the meat, not the skin!), and record any changes of color (it will be immediate) Repeat steps 1-14 with the other 2 types of hot dogs
Crime Scene Items • After completing these tests, the same tests were performed on each of the items left at the crime scene. • The data of the crime scene items were then compared to the data obtained previously.
Conclusion • According to the data, the items at the crime scene were: water, an iron wrap, sucrose, and a pork hot dog. • The Iodine (reactivity) test performed on the crime scene hotdog showed that a Pork hot dog was prepared. • The density test performed on the crime scene liquid, showed that the liquid prepared was water. • The melting test performed on the crime scene powder showed that the powder used was Sucrose. • The reactivity test (Hydrochloric Acid) performed on the crime scene metal showed that it was Iron.
Conclusion • Original Hypothesis: Prince Charming poisoned Buzz because the foods he prepared appeared to match the items left at the crime scene. • The data showed the hypothesis was incorrect. • Based on these results, Ariel poisoned Buzz.
Interesting trends, patterns, etc. • For the experiments used during this investigation, all of the Metal wraps (iron, zinc, aluminum, and copper) had pretty much the same data
Conclusions: Limitations • Some limitations to the experiment: • Time-could not repeat trials because of time limits
Conclusions: Flaws • The temperature of the burners was not recorded and melting points may not have been reached
Next Logical Experiment To determine which item had the poison in it.
Poison Article • http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Poison-Pellet-Murder&id=3802336
References • http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3a/4mmc.png • http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/14/Graduated_cylinder.jpg • http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/81/Sodium_bicarbonate.jpg • http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c0/Iodine_trichloride.JPG • http://fc96.deviantart.com/fs45/i/2009/126/c/3/Ariel_by_Norm27.jpg