1 / 10

Gang Kou School of Management and Economics

Risk Analysis in Software Engineering and Incident Management -Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Data Mining. Gang Kou School of Management and Economics University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Supported by the National Science Foundation of China (#70901015 and 70921061).

Download Presentation

Gang Kou School of Management and Economics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Risk Analysis in Software Engineering and Incident Management-Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Data Mining Gang Kou School of Management and Economics University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Supported by the National Science Foundation of China (#70901015 and 70921061) University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

  2. 寇纲 博士、教授 • 电子科技大学经济与管理学院教授\博士生导师\院长助理 • 清华大学物理专业学士, 美国内布拉斯加州立大学计算机专业硕士和信息技术博士(USNews排名-全美信息和技术管理专业第6) • 主持中国国家自然科学基金委(4项), 教育部(3项),美国国防部及数个世界财富500强公司的多项基金和项目 • 发表80余篇学术论文和著作章节,其中SCI收录18篇,EI收录30余篇 • 执行主编,IJITDM(SCI期刊,影响因子1.312) • 国家自然科学基金委 “可信软件基础研究”重大研究计划特邀评审专家 • 中国管理现代化研究会常务理事兼商务智能专业委员会(筹)秘书长 • 四川省学术和技术带头人后备人选 • 中国系统工程学会理事兼青年工作委员会委员 • 中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会理事兼应急管理专业委员会常务理事和青年工作委员会副主任 • 中国灾害防御协会风险分析专业委员会理事兼副秘书长 • 常务副主任,风险分析与数据科学研究中心和信息管理与电子商务研究所 • 中国科学院虚拟经济与数据科学研究中心兼职研究员 University of Electronic Science and Technology of China 2

  3. International Journal of Information Technology&Decision Making IJITDM provides a global forum for exchanging research findings and case studies which bridge the latest information technology and various decision-making techniques. It promotes how information technology improves decision techniques as well as how the development of decision-making tools affects the information technology era. (SCI) http://www.worldscinet.com/ijitdm/mkt/editorial.shtml University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

  4. 了解期刊 找到期刊主页 • 看相关介绍: Aims & Scope, Readership, Objectives, Editorial board! • 过去2年的论文题目和摘要 University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

  5. 投稿 • 认真阅读Instructions for Authors/Call for Papers • Suggested reviewers • 修改稿对审稿人表示感谢,在cover letter对主编表示感谢 • 投稿需引用该期刊近年的论文! University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

  6. 学术论文稿件处理流程 • 主编初审-方向,语言,篇幅,质量,ethics • Referee-2到3个匿名评审人(单盲,双盲) • 建议reviewer-与作者无直接关系(同地区,单位,行业,师生,同事,以前的共同作者),地域代表性,引用的该期刊文献作者,选择一位编委 • 评审结果-reviewer意见不一致 • 修改稿-快,每一个意见的答复,改/不改的理由 • 尊重同行的义务劳动-语法,拼写,明显的逻辑错 University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

  7. 审稿的作用 • Professional and comprehensive evaluations; • Accuracy in determining the appropriateness of the topics/issues, the relevance of the papers, the managerial significance, and the conceptual and methodological rigor; • Valuable comments toward developing manuscripts into high-quality publishable research; and • Overall evaluation performance. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

  8. 稿件被拒的常见原因 • 论文无新意:国际刊物最欢迎的是具有原创性的工作。实验论点重复别人已发表的文献,或经过简单推理就能从已知的国际文献中推理获得,或重复他人工作者常被拒稿。 • 分析不到位:有新的发现,但未能很好地提炼、升华并上升到理论的高度。只有单纯的定性描述,缺乏定量的、理论的分析。 • 理由不够充分:论文提出的论点不能通过该实验方案所证实。逻辑推理有问题,实验方法学理论的欠缺。作者未能公正客观地从其实验结果中推得结论。 • 实验不完善:数据或分析存在严重缺陷。实验数据量太小。 • 数据统计处理不当:数据统计检验方法和统计学分析方法不对或不够妥当。 • 应用领域窄:仅仅是区域性(Local) 工作,而不是具有普遍意义、可以推广到其他地方的工作(General) ,或仅仅是国外方法在中国某一地区的应用,而不是提出新的方法。 • 语言描述问题:英文语法错误太多,表达不当。论文组织得不好,文字功夫欠佳,国外审稿人难以看懂。 University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

  9. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND DECISION MAKINGReferee’s Report • Recommendation: Accept without revision _____ • Accept with minor revision* _____ • Provisional acceptance _____ • But revision necessary _____ • Reject _____ • Should the paper be refereed again after these minor revisions? YES/NO • Additional Ratings (please tick) Poor Average Good Excellent • Originality of work ____ _____ _____ ______ • Relevance ____ _____ _____ ______ Soundness of methodology ____ _____ _____ ______ Clarity and organization of paper ____ _____ _____ ______ University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

  10. Risk Analysis in Software Engineering and Incident Management • Multiple Criteria Decision Making • Data Mining University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

More Related