1 / 1

Rachel Knight, Sherrilyn Reed, Erica Lancaster, Wayne Withrow, Maggie Phipps, John Sherman.

Environmental Health Division Solid Waste Code Enforcement - Complaint Response. ‘PDSA’ Description

dong
Download Presentation

Rachel Knight, Sherrilyn Reed, Erica Lancaster, Wayne Withrow, Maggie Phipps, John Sherman.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Environmental Health Division Solid Waste Code Enforcement - Complaint Response • ‘PDSA’ Description • Work group (program manager, team lead, field inspector, program support staff, and QI facilitator) analyzed existing data and identified several potential methods to decrease the time to first inspection. • Decreased the standard time-to-first -inspection date, as established in initial correspondence from 20 to 14 days, effective Q3-2009. • Evaluated results; immediate positive impact upon this performance measure. • Examined possible impacts elsewhere in the system: • •Case closure (resolution) rate at time of first inspection • •Average case-open time Background/Problem: The Code Enforcement Program is responsible for investigating and resolving community complaints regarding garbage, illegal dumping, and on-site sewage complaints, throughout Pierce County. The program was not meeting the following performance measure: Respond to more than 80% of Solid Waste Code Enforcement complaints within 20 days. Baseline data: 77% (2008). Change theory: If, we can respond more quickly to solid waste complaints then we can (1) more quickly resolve current or potential public health risks, (2) provide better customer service, and (3) improve program efficiency. Aim Statement: Meet or exceed the established 80% of first inspections within 20 days performance measure. Process change point (effective Q3-2009) Rachel Knight, Sherrilyn Reed, Erica Lancaster, Wayne Withrow, Maggie Phipps, John Sherman. Not Pictured: Chet Morris • Future Plans • Continue to monitor program performance against this and other metrics. • Continue to monitor the competing demands of solid waste and on-site sewage complaints. • Continue to monitor caseloads and impact upon performance measures • Lessons learned… • or confirmed • Knowing your workflow/process in detail is vital. • Quality data and good reporting tools are critical; investments here pay off. • QI tools used • Work Flow Analysis: To identify process intervention points. • Root cause analysis: To identify factors delaying response times.

More Related