1 / 23

HydroEurope Final Presentation

This presentation examines the impact of new roads on urban flood resilience in Nice using hydraulic modeling software, including MIKE 11, HEC-RAS, and IBER. The effects of reduction in channel width by new roads are analyzed, and the evaluation of urban flood resilience is discussed. The conclusion highlights the need for capacity building and improvement in public response knowledge.

donnyg
Download Presentation

HydroEurope Final Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HydroEurope Final Presentation Pranav DHAWAN, Wooseok JANG, Kalpesh MALANI, Pablo SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ Clément LUCAS, Anna MSIGWA, Hakim OUERTANI, Malo LAMBERT

  2. Table of Contents • Project Overview • MIKE 11 • HEC-RAS • IBER • IBER - Effect of New Roads • Conclusion • Evaluation of urban flood resilience • Results City Scale • Conclusion and Recommendation

  3. Project Overview Hydraulic Modelling Software used: This week’s question • Modeling of structures (weir formulas, comparison with recorded values) • Effects of reduction of channel width by new road (50 m & same as levees elevation) Input Data: • Flood event of 1994 Validation Data: • Measured maximum levels at weirs 2-D Models 1. Iber 1-D Models 1. MIKE 11 2. HEC-RAS VS

  4. MIKE 11 Weir Formula - Discharge through the structure can be modelled Villemonte Formula Honma’s Formula Q = discharge through structure W = Width C1 = first weir coefficient Hus = upstream water level Hds = downstream water level Hw = is weir level is the second weir coefficient

  5. MIKE 11 C1 ≈ 0.488

  6. MIKE 11

  7. Effects of New Roads MIKE 11

  8. HEC-RAS Input data • 62 cross sections • 8 weirs • Manning's coefficient : RB = LB = 0.06 • MC = 0.03 • Simulation time : 4 November 1994, 12 : 00 to 7 November 1994, 00 : 00 Weir Formula • C = Weir Flow coefficient • L = Length of the spillway crest • H = Upstream Energy Head above the spillway crest

  9. HEC-RAS

  10. HEC-RAS

  11. HEC-RAS

  12. IBER Weir Formula • Discharge through the structure can be modelled • In that case it has been directly implemented in the mesh

  13. IBER - Effects of New Roads IBER permit the simulation of free surface flow in natural and artificial channels by the resolution of 2D Shallow Water Equations Inputs: • Manning coefficients (0.03, 0.04 and 0.02) • Cell size discretization: (10m, 75m and 300m) • Initial condition: 0.3 in the river bed • Inflow: 04/11/1994 12:00 - 05/11/1994 11:00 • Weirs and road implemented directly on the mesh

  14. IBER - Effects of New Roads No road Road Results:

  15. IBER - Effects of New Roads Level Level Time Time Level Level Time Time

  16. IBER - Effects of New Roads Road No road

  17. IBER - Effects of New Roads Points to consider: • The coarse cell size of the DEM and the mesh does not permit the properly representation of structures (weirs, roads,...) • The resolution of the dem and mesh size should be at least the same or smaller than the dimension of the structures. • There is insufficient data for the calibration of the 2D model • Example: extent of the flood area, time-series of water level/discharge in several point of the domain,...)

  18. Conclusions Weirs 1D : - Easy to calibrate - Several possibilities of formulas - Time of the simulation quick 2D : - Difficulties to calibrate (need accurate data) - Not many possibilities to represent the weirs - Time of simulation very long Better to use 1D Road 1D : Time consuming in changing all the cross section 2D : Easier to select a bigger area and increase it Better to use 2D, still need accurate data Effect of the road : Difficulties to make an accurate analysis but first impression with our model is that it could have a huge impact on the possible flooding

  19. Evaluation of urban flood resilience • Introduction - Flood resilience index (FRI) represent level of flood resilience assessment in analysing area and for certain flood characteristic • Methodology - Parcel scale - City scale • Results

  20. Evaluation of urban flood resilience FRI map and Urban Functions on part of Nice city

  21. Results City Scale

  22. Conclusion and Recommendation • The assessment shows that the city of Nice is aware of the flood and motivated to address it. However, capacity building of human resources remains limited. Interventions are more numerous and long term. Development and implementation of solutions. Recommendation • -Traditionally, flood education only focus on raising awareness. It should also focus on how to • improve the response knowledge of the public.

  23. Thank you for your attention

More Related