270 likes | 380 Views
February 17, 2006. The SEC’s Disclosure Proposals for Executive Compensation . Today’s Speakers. Mark Borges Principal – Mercer Human Resource Consulting Cathy Creech Partner – Benefits Group of Davis 7 Harman LLP Lynn Dudley Vice President – American Benefits Council John McGuiness
E N D
February 17, 2006 The SEC’s Disclosure Proposals for Executive Compensation
Today’s Speakers Mark Borges Principal – Mercer Human Resource Consulting Cathy Creech Partner – Benefits Group of Davis 7 Harman LLP Lynn Dudley Vice President – American Benefits Council John McGuiness Principal – Groom Law Group
Agenda • Overview • Summary of Executive Compensation Proposals • Individuals Covered • Compensation Discussion and Analysis • Summary Compensation Table • Outstanding Equity Awards and Realized Gains • Post-Employment Payments and Benefits • Director Compensation • Preparing for Next Year’s Disclosure • Questions
Overview • Proposals issued by SEC on January 27, 2006 • First significant revision in 14 years • What happens next? • 60-day comment period – ends April 10, 2006 • SEC staff will evaluate comments and formulate final recommendations • Commission will consider and adopt final rules later this year • Effective dates – new rules will apply to: • Proxy statements filed 90 days or more after publication of final rules • Annual reports for fiscal years ending 60 days or more after publication • Forms 8-K filed for triggering events occurring 60 days or more after publication • Registration statements that become effective 120 days or more after publication
Individuals Covered • Named executive officers • Any person who during the last fiscal year served (at any time) as • principal executive officer • principal financial officer, PLUS • Three most highly-compensated executive officers (other than the PEO and PFO) who were serving as executive officers at end of last fiscal year, PLUS • Based on total compensation • Disclosure not required if total compensation does not exceed $100,000 • Up to two additional individuals who would have been among the top three most highly-compensated executive officers except they were no longer serving as executive officers at end of last fiscal year
Compensation Discussion and Analysis • Replaces Board Compensation Committee Report and Performance Graph • Overview of executive compensation program • Summary of each program element • Provides context for tabular disclosure • Must discuss six specific items: • Program objectives • Behaviors that program is designed to reward and not reward • Elements of compensation • Rationale for each element • Methodology (including formula) used to determine amount for each element • How each element and decisions regarding that element fit into overall compensation objectives and affect decisions regarding other elements
Compensation Discussion and Analysis • Considered company, rather than compensation committee, disclosure • Will be considered “filed” with, rather than “furnished” to, the SEC • Subjects CD&A to full liability under the federal securities laws • Covered by SOX Section 302 CEO and CFO certifications to the extent incorporated into an Securities Exchange Act periodic report (for example, Form 10-K) • Need not disclose performance target levels, or factors/criteria involving confidential commercial or business information
Summary Compensation Table – All Other Compensation • Any compensation item that is not properly reported in any other column • Perquisites and other personal benefits • Earnings on NQDC arrangements (including defined contribution plans) • Tax “gross-ups” and reimbursements • Discount stock purchases (unless arrangement is broadly available) • Amounts paid or accrued under severance or change-in-control arrangements • Company contributions to qualified defined contribution plans • Aggregate increase in actuarial value of defined benefit pension plans • Value of insurance premiums paid by company for NEO life insurance • Item must be identified and quantified if amount exceeds $10,000
Perquisites • While not defined, proposals provide analytical framework for determining: • An item: • Is not a perquisite if “integrally and directly related to the performance of the executive’s duties” • Is a perquisite if “confers a direct or indirect benefit that has a personal aspect, without regard to whether it may be provided for some business reason or for the convenience of the company” • Proposed disclosure requirements • Must be disclosed if aggregate value perquisites is $10,000 or more • If disclosed, must be individually identified • Must be quantified only if individual item has value in excess of greater of: • $25,000 or • 10% of total perquisites
Name Perform-ance-Based Stock and Stock-based Incentive Plans: number of shares, units or other rights(#) Perform-ance-Based Options: number of securities underlying Options(#) Non-Stock Incentive Plan Awards: number of unitsor other rights(#) Dollar amount of consid-eration paid for award, if any($) Grant Datefor Stock or Option Awards Perform-ance or other period until vesting or payout and Option Expira-tion Date Estimatedfuturepayouts Threshold($)or(#) Target($)or(#) Maxi-mum($)or(#) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) PEO PFO A B C SCT Supplemental Table:Grants of Performance-Based Awards Table
SCT Supplemental Tables:Grants of All Other Equity Awards Table
SCT Supplemental Narrative • Must discuss any “material factors” required to make presentation in SCT and supplemental tables understandable: • Materials terms of NEO employment agreements • Description of any option repricing or material modification of outstanding equity award • Material terms of performance-based awards • Assumptions underlying calculation of defined benefit pension plans actuarial value • Narrative must also include total compensation and job description for up to three non-executive employees whose total compensation exceeded that of any NEO
Post-Employment Payments and Benefits • Proposals would require individualized disclosure for each NEO • Retirement Plan Potential Annual Payments and Benefits Table • Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Deferred Compensation Plans Table • Potential payments upon termination or change-in-control • Narrative, rather than tabular, disclosure • Must quantify amount payable to each NEO • Must disclose assumptions
Retirement Plan Potential Annual Payments and Benefits Table
Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Deferred Compensation Plans Table
Potential Payments Upon termination or Change-in-Control • Covers any contract, agreement, plan, or arrangement (whether or not in writing) providing for payments at, following, or in connection with any termination of employment, including: • Resignation • Retirement • Termination without cause (including a constructive termination) • Termination with cause • Change-in-control • Covers any payments and other benefits (including perquisites) payable upon the occurrence of any of these events
Implications for Next Year’s Disclosure • Although probably not effective until 2007, current compensation decisions are affected • Should assess current disclosure practices under proposals • Are improvements needed? • Are shareholders requesting disclosure not covered in proposals? • Consider how current program will be described under proposals • What more is needed to “explain the numbers?” • Can compensation philosophy be explained thoroughly and succinctly? • Consider presentation formats that are easy to understand • Look for potential “double counting” pitfalls
Implications for 2007 Disclosure • CD&A will require significantly more detailed disclosure • Provides a broad framework, but companies must “tell their own story” • Proposals emphasize the “how” and “why” as much as the “how much” • Requires greater demonstration of pay-for-performance relationship • Putting policies and decisions in writing may be a daunting task • Can you tell a compelling story? • Identify compensation elements that will comprise “Total Compensation” figure • Develop internal “tally” sheets • Review benchmark data and process and validate what is “competitive pay” • Decide whether certain program elements should be revised or eliminated • Will need to monitor all executive officers to identify NEOs
Implications for 2007 Disclosure • Determine appropriate and consistent valuation methods • Equity valuation • Nonqualified deferred compensation earnings • Defined benefit pension plan actuarial values • Perquisites • Examine impact of new disclosure values and calculations • Post-employment payments and benefits arrangements may generate numbers that may never be realized • Defined benefit pension plan calculation likely to be complex and confusing • Disclosure of NQDC arrangements will duplicate aspects of the SCT • Severance and change-in-control disclosure to be continued hot button • Model various termination scenarios to select appropriate disclosure • Select reasonable assumptions
Implications for 2007 Disclosure • Items to remember • Quality – not quantity, is key • Use “plain English” in narrative discussions • Consider using charts and bullets • The Performance Graph (which charts TSR), not the discussion of TSR, is being eliminated • Disclosure is not limited to the proxy statement • Consider using websites and other venues Bottom line: Begin planning now!