1 / 16

MONITORING of SCHOOLS of MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY

MONITORING of SCHOOLS of MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY. Presented by: Dr. Annie Pring-Valdez CHED-TCME – member PASMETH – Vice President. REPUBLIC ACT 7722 HIGHER EDUCATION ACT OF 1994. Sec 8. Powers & Functions of the Commission e) Monitor & evaluate the performance of

dorian-chan
Download Presentation

MONITORING of SCHOOLS of MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MONITORING of SCHOOLS of MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY Presented by: Dr. Annie Pring-Valdez CHED-TCME – member PASMETH – Vice President

  2. REPUBLIC ACT 7722 HIGHER EDUCATION ACT OF 1994 Sec 8. Powers & Functions of the Commission e) Monitor & evaluate the performance of programs & institutions of higher learning for appropriate incentives as well as the imposition of sanctions such as, but not limited to, diminution or withdrawal of subsidy, recommendation on the down- grading or withdrawal of accreditation, program termination or school closure

  3. REPUBLIC ACT 7722 HIGHER EDUCATION ACT OF 1994 See 12. The Technical Panels The Commission shall reconstitute and/or organize technical panels for different disciplines/program areas. They shall assist the Commission in setting standards and in program and institution monitoring and evaluation. The technical panels shall be composed of senior specialists or academicians to be appointed by the Commission.

  4. AREAS OF EVALUATION • ADMINISTRATION • 1.1. Vision and Mission • 1.2. Organizational Structure • II. DEAN • 2.1. Appropriate undergraduate degree • 2.2. Appropriate graduate degree • 2.3. Appropriate license • 2.4. Appropriate teaching/administrative experience 2.5. Full-time with contract

  5. AREAS OF EVALUATION III. FACULTY 3.1. Appropriate bachelor’s degree 3.2. Appropriate postgraduate degree 3.3. Appropriate professional license 3.4. Appropriate 3.4.1. Teaching experience 3.4.2. Training experience 3.4.3. Working experience 3.5. Faculty load 3.6. Faculty development program 3.7. Full-time to part-time ratio 3.8. Faculty-student ratio 3.9. Faculty manual 3.10. Faculty salary rating scale 3.11. Faculty ranking scale

  6. AREAS OF EVALUATION • CURRICULUM • 4.1. Conformity with policies & standards V. INSTRUCTIONAL STANDARDS 5.1. Course syllabi 5.2. Instructional Materials/aids 5.3. Internship/Externship Program/ RLE/Practicum

  7. AREAS OF EVALUATION • VI. STUDENTS & ALUMNI • 6.1. Student Manual • 6.2. Admission and Retention Policies • 6.3. Student Services • 6.4. Health services • 6.5. Guidance Counseling Services • 6.6. Student Organizations related to discipline 6.7. Student Alumni 6.8. Linkages 6.9. Job fair/Placement

  8. AREAS OF EVALUATION VII. LABORATORY FACILITIES and EQUIPMENT 7.1. Basic Laboratory 7.2. Supplies 7.3. Reagents 7.4. Waste Disposal System 7.5. Ventilation 7.6. Safety Measures

  9. AREAS OF EVALUATION VIII. LIBRARY 8.1. Licensed librarian 8.2. General Courses 8.3. Major Courses 8.4. Journals 8.5. IT Facilities

  10. AREAS OF EVALUATION • IX. PHYSICAL PLANT & FACILITIES • 9.1. Location and Floor plan • 9.2. Building • 9.3. Classrooms/Laboratory Rooms • 9.4. AV Rooms and facilities • 9.5. Recreational Areas • 9.6. Health facilities (infirmary or clinic) • 9.7. Restrooms • 9.8. Student and Faculty canteens • 9.9. Student and faculty lounge

  11. AREAS OF EVALUATION • X. RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT • 10.1. Facilities • 10.2. On-going research • 10.3. Completed research • 10.4. Published research XI. COMMUNITY OUTREACH/LINKAGES 11.1. Current Program/Output

  12. AREAS OF EVALUATION • XII. BOARD PERFORMANCE • 12.1. Percentage of passing for the past three years • 1-25 examinees • 26-100 examinees • 101 and above

  13. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS • AREAS OF EVALUATIONCOMPLIANCEREMARKS • Administration • Dean • Faculty • Curriculum • Instructional Standards • Students & Alumni • Laboratory Facilities • Library • Physical Plant & Facilities • Research & Development • Community Outreach/Linkages • Board Performance

  14. OVERALL RECOMMENDATION: EVALUATOR: DATE EVALUATED: CONFORME:

  15. Thank you very much

More Related