340 likes | 467 Views
Electronic Commerce Act 2000 Fifteen Hot Tips and More. Toronto Computer Lawyers’ Group December 2000 John D. Gregory Ministry of the Attorney General. Outline: ECA 2000. Status of the Ontario Act Principles and Application of the Act What you can do with the ECA
E N D
Electronic Commerce Act 2000Fifteen Hot Tips and More Toronto Computer Lawyers’ Group December 2000 John D. Gregory Ministry of the Attorney General
Outline: ECA 2000 • Status of the Ontario Act • Principles and Application of the Act • What you can do with the ECA • What you can’t do with the ECA • What you must be careful of with the ECA • How this compares with elsewhere • What’s next? • Sources Electronic Commerce Act 2000
Status of the ECA 2000 • Electronic Commerce Act 2000 • Statutes of Ontario 2000, c. 17 • In force October 16, 2000 • Comprehensive minimalist legislation • Interprets most Ontario laws • Sources: • United Nations Model Law on E-Commerce • Uniform Electronic Commerce Act Electronic Commerce Act 2000
Principles of E-Commerce Act • “media neutral” - the law of electronic communications is the same as the law of any other medium; the Act merely accommodates the differences of media. • “technology neutral” - the law does not favour one technology over another. • “removes barriers” - the Act does not regulate e-communications or harmonize existing laws that already govern them. Electronic Commerce Act 2000
Principles of E-Commerce Act • General rule: no discrimination • General protection: only on consent (express or implied)(real and relevant) • media bias or reality check? • “Functional equivalents”: what an electronic document has to be or do in order to work as a document on paper • NOTE: e-documents do not have to be more reliable than paper documents Electronic Commerce Act 2000
Application of E-Commerce Act • ALL legal relationships under Ontario law BUT: • named types of documents • wills, most powers of attorney • most land transfers • most negotiable instruments • election documents - municipal and provincial • electronic communications already provided for by law (allowed, regulated, prohibited) • biometrics, unless consent or statutory authority • power to add to list by regulation (safety valve) Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you can do with the ECA • 1. Use an electronic document when something has to be “in writing” • The e-document has to be “accessible so as to be usable for subsequent reference” • Accessible to whom? Objective or subjective? • Usable for the same purpose as the writing • How long is “subsequent”? • No standard of integrity beyond this. Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you can do with the ECA • 2. Sign with an e-signature a document that the law requires to be signed. • “Electronic signature” - includes intention to sign, link with signed document • VERY open-ended definition • No rule for attribution • No standard of integrity beyond definition • Authority for govt to regulate methods Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you can do with the ECA • 3. Use an electronic document as an “original” • Can have an electronic original or an electronic version of another original • Key is (variable) assurance of integrity of the information • Is format part of the information? • Note PPSA exception for chattel paper Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you can do with the ECA • 4. Retain electronic records to satisfy a retention requirement • E-documents retained may be originals or electronic reproductions • Key is integrity again • Evidence of transmission to be kept • Retain for same period, accessible to same people as paper records Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you can do with the ECA • 5. Enter into contracts electronically • Clicking, touching, speaking to computer are all acceptable methods • Can automate the offer and the acceptance • The usual legal requirements remain: • Intention to contract • Consideration • Nothing about when a message is effective Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you can’t do with the ECA • 1. Compel someone to deal with you by electronic communications • Consent rule mitigates discomfort levels • Consent rule mitigates security risk • Consent may be inferred from conduct if reasonable and relevant • Consent rule applies to public bodies too Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you can’t do with the ECA • 2. Create a unique electronic document • Different from attribution or integrity • Technologically not yet clear • distinct from immobilizing document • So no negotiability, documents of title • Carriage of goods is exception • target for technology rather than affirmation of existing capacity Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you can’t do with the ECA • 3. Ignore consumer protection and privacy law • Consumer protection is under separate study • published principles aim mainly at disclosure • Alberta and Manitoba have drafted regulations • status of post-transaction notices is hot in US • Privacy overlies the whole topic • Federal laws take effect in two weeks • Ontario legislation is possible Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you can’t do with the ECA • 4. Skip reading the law applicable to your facts • The ECA yields to other law that prohibits, regulates or allows electronic documents • Display and delivery requirements still apply • but if you can opt out, you can use e-docs • you may be able to comply electronically • Rules of court, land transfers, etc etc Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you can’t do with the ECA • 5. Seal a document • Unclear how to do an electronic seal • cf. Court seal for electronic writs • E-seal is much like e-signature • One size does not fit all: • function: consideration or solemnity • function: integrity of document • function: assurance of source of document • ECA authorizes regulations on seals Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you have to be careful of • 1. Security of e-documents and e-signatures • A legal standard is not necessarily a prudent standard • Party autonomy means risk as well as choice • Consent principle provides some protection • Security for confidentiality is also important Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you have to be careful of • 2. Providing information electronically • Information has to be accessible for subsequent use and capable of being retained • You can’t inhibit printing or downloading • You can’t provide information by posting on a web site • except by e-mail or in course of transaction • except where the law provides otherwise Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you have to be careful of • 3. Encouraging mistakes • An individual dealing with an electronic agent (any web site) can void transaction for mistake • if meets conditions, notably does not keep benefit • Could be hard if transaction is in a series • Provide means to avoid or cure mistakes • “Are you sure”? Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you have to be careful of • 4. Has your message been received? • The ECA has a double rule on receipt: • designated system: presumed received when accessible and processible • undesignated system: presumed received when addressee becomes aware of accessibility • Evidence of accessibility may be scarce • When in doubt: get acknowledgement Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you have to be careful of • 5. Public bodies’ IT standards • Public bodies can require that incoming documents meet IT standards • No form requirement for these standards • may be as simple as word processing type • most public bodies will be flexible, OTC rule • Standards must be communicated • Harmonization of IT standards - likely? Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What you have to be careful of • 6. Existing form requirements in contracts • The ECA applies to legal requirements for writing, signature, and others • The ECA does not interpret a contractual rule e.g. that something has to be in writing • Parties to such agreements will have to cure them by agreement Electronic Commerce Act 2000
How ECA compares … to C-6 • 1. Privacy in C-6 not UECA • 2. Electronic documents: • C-6 is opt-in • standards are to be in regulation • “secure electronic signatures” • 3. Electronic evidence: • C-6 enacts Uniform Electronic Evidence Act, and optional presumptions • Ontario enacted UEEA in Red Tape Reduction Act 1999 Sch B section 7 (in force June 30/00) Electronic Commerce Act 2000
How ECA compares … to ROC • Saskatchewan Bill 38 (in force Nov 1/00) • basically the same, except govt filing rules • Manitoba Bill 31 (in force Oct 23/00 +-) • MB Bill is “opt in” for functional equivalents • MB has some consumer protection too • Nova Scotia Bill 61 (in force Dec 1/00) • basically the same as UECA • British Columbia Bill 32 (1st reading) • BC Bill has no special “government” rules Electronic Commerce Act 2000
How ECA compares … to ROC • Yukon Bill 29 (3rd reading) • basically the same as UECA • Quebec Bill 161 (2nd reading) • different approach, more detailed rules • more on integrity of documents and signatures • rules on certification processes for signatures • rules on establishment of tech. standards • public consultation already on draft bill • New Brunswick, Alberta to come soon Electronic Commerce Act 2000
How ECA compares … to USA • Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) • UETA and ECA draw on UN Model Law • UETA focuses on “record” • Consent, functional equivalence +- the same • UETA allows for “transferable records” • UETA passed in half the states in a year Electronic Commerce Act 2000
How ECA compares … to USA • Federal legislation - E-SIGN • Electronic Signatures in Global & National Commerce Act in force October 1/00 • Imposes UETA standards on state laws • no higher standards allowed for private use • public agencies may require more security • Consumer protection carve-outs • must demonstrate capacity to receive e-docs • especially post-default notices Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What’s next • Electronic signatures • UN Model Law on Electronic Signatures • reliability standards • duties of parties: signature, CA, relying party • recognition of foreign certificates and signatures • GO-PKI and others • identity certificates and role certificates • who certifies lawyers? • Smart cards • signatures vs access controls • privacy rules Electronic Commerce Act 2000
What’s next • Licensing - no sign of UCITA in Canada • Jurisdiction • few cases, more or less like US cases • regulatory jurisdiction - Alberta cases • enforcement of judgments - Hague work • Dispute resolution - signs of interest • Taxation - the big issue • Connectivity - serious initiatives Electronic Commerce Act 2000
Sources • Electronic Commerce Act 2000 • http://www.ontla.on.ca/Documents/StatusofLegOUT/ b088ra_e.htm • Uniform Electronic Commerce Act • www.ulcc.ca/alri/ulc/current/euecafa.htm • United Nations Model Laws • http://www.unictral.org/english/texts/electcom/ml-ec.htm (Model Law on Electronic Commerce) • http://www.uncitral.org/english/sessions/unc/unc-34/483e.pdf (Model Law on Electronic Signatures) • Uniform Electronic Transactions Act • http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/ulc.htm#ueccta Electronic Commerce Act 2000
Sources • Canadian legislation • Saskatchewan: The Electronic Documents and Information Act, http://www.legassembly.sk.ca/bills/HTML/bill038.htm • Manitoba: The Electronic Commerce and Information Act, http://www.gov.mb.ca/chc/statpub/free/pdf/b31-1s00.pdf • Nova Scotia: the Electronic Commerce Act http://www.gov.ns.ca/legi/legc/bills/58th_1st/3rd_read/b061.htm • British Columbia: the Electronic Transactions Act http://www.legis.gov.bc.ca/2000/1st_read/gov32-1.htm Electronic Commerce Act 2000
Sources • Yukon: the Electronic Commerce Act (Bill 29) http://www.gov.yk.ca/leg-assembly/progress.html • Quebec: An Act to establish a legal framework for information technology http://www.assnat.qc.ca/eng/publications/Projets-loi/publics/00-a161.htm. • Canada: Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act http://www.parl.gc.ca/36/2/parlbus/chambus/house/bills/government/C-6/C-6_4/C-6_cover-E.html Electronic Commerce Act 2000
Sources • Consumer Protection • Principles for Consumer Protection • Government, consumer, business group, Nov 1999: • http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/SSG/ca01180e.html • Ontario consultation 2000 • http://www.ccr.gov.on.ca/pdf/EnConsProt.pdf • Manitoba draft regulations on consumers • http://www.gov.mb.ca/cca/cpa/in_age.html • Public Interest Advocacy Centre on UECA • http://www.piac.ca/uecalet.htm Electronic Commerce Act 2000
Sources • Privacy • Ontario consultation 2000 http://www.ccr.gov.on.ca/pdf/PrivacyPaper.pdf • U.S. Legislation and Policy • Uniform Electronic Transactions Act http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/ulc.htm#ueccta http://www.uetaonline.com • Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/ulc.htm#ucita http://www.ucitaonline.com • State, federal and international law: http://www.bmck.com/ecommerce http://www.mbc.com/ Electronic Commerce Act 2000