170 likes | 189 Views
A longitudinal analysis of liver fibrosis progression among NNRTI and PI users in the Canadian co-infection cohort study. Laurence Brunet, Erica E. M. Moodie , Jim Young ,Sharon Walmsley , Mark Hull, Curtis Cooper, Marina B. Klein IAS 2015 21 July 2015. Background. HIV-HCV co-infection.
E N D
A longitudinal analysis of liver fibrosis progression among NNRTI and PI users in the Canadian co-infection cohort study Laurence Brunet, Erica E. M. Moodie, Jim Young,SharonWalmsley, Mark Hull, Curtis Cooper, Marina B. Klein IAS 2015 21 July 2015
HIV-HCV co-infection • 20-30% of HIV+ are co-infected • HCV can be cured • Only effective intervention to prevent liver diseaseprogression • Very few have access to treatment • Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) • Used by majority • Life-long treatment
ART and the liver • Studies are limited • Short-term/acute toxicity vs. long-term/cumulative toxicity • Inclusion of hepatotoxic backbones (e.g. DDI) • Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI): • Nevirapine associated with hepatotoxicity, fibrosis & clinical liver outcomes • No association between efavirenz and liver outcomes • Protease inhibitors (PI): • Liver steatosis • Lower risks of fibrosis & cirrhosis, slower fibrosis progression rates • Comparison group: treatment naïve or mono/dual-therapy with NRTI
Research objective • Estimating the rate of change in a marker of liver fibrosis among new users of two classes of anchor agents for cART
New user design CCC participants N=1321 • No chronic HCV infection (n=216) • Not on 1st anchor class (n=334) • On HCV treatment (n=23) • Not on PI or NNRTI (n=192) • Not on recommended backbone (n=177) • Not on 1st line anchor agent (n=21) • Hepatitis B infection (n=8) Unmatched sample N=348 • Unmatched NNRTI users (n=9) • Unmatched PI users (n=25) Matched sample N=314 N=628 including repeats
Liver fibrosis • APRI score • Aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio • Validated in co-infected populations • Accuracy comparable to other markers • Continuous score • Predicts overall five-year survival in HCV infected persons (HR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.6, 4.7) • Predicted by known predictors of liver disease
Statistical analysis • Rates of change in APRI score by class of anchor agent and backbone • Linear regression with generalized estimating equations • Outcome: Ln(APRI) • Covariates: • Baseline: age, sex, time since HCV infection • Time updated: alcohol use, CD4 count, HIV viral load<50 copies/ml
Median rates of change in APRI score per 5 years by regimen 1.5 Significant liver fibrosis 1.08 (0.97, 1.19) 1.03 (0.93, 1.12) 1.16 (1.04, 1.29) 1.11 (1.02, 1.20) PI + ABC/3TC PI + TDF/FTC NNRTI + ABC/3TC NNRTI + TDF/FTC
Take home message • 1st study restricted to modern cART regimens • Fibrosis development more influenced by backbone than class of anchor agent • ABC/3TC associated with changes in APRI score over time • Study not designed to look at backbone specifically • Findings need to be confirmed • WHO guideline for cART initiation (all populations): EFV + TDF + (3TC or FTC)
Acknowledgments • The participants of HIV-HCV Canadian Cohort (CTN 222) • The Co-Investigators, Drs. Jeff Cohen, Brian Conway, Curtis Cooper, Pierre Côté, Joseph Cox, John Gill, David Haase, Shariq Haider, Marianne Harris, Mark Hull, Lynn Johnston, Valerie Martel-Laferriere, Julio Montaner, Erica Moodie, Neora Pick, Anita Rachlis, Danielle Rouleau, Aida Sadr, Stephen Sanche, Roger Sandre, Mark Tyndall, Marie-Louise Vachon, Sharon Walmsley, David Wong • We thank Brenda Beckthold, Claire Casavant, Isabelle Chabot, Warmond Chan, Jonathan Edwin, Elaine Fernandez, Claude Gagne, Marcela Gil, Heather Haldane, Judy Latendre-Paquette, Nancy McFarland, Jennifer Kocilowicz, Anja Mcneil, Mitra Motamedi, Renee Pugsley, Laura Puri for their assistance with study coordination, participant recruitment and care • The funding agencies: CIHR, FRSQ and CTN
Thank you! Questions?