1 / 33

Practical Experimentation in Cataloging: FRBR Approach

Explore FRBR implementation issues & examples, including repetitive data entry solutions and unique cataloging challenges. Presented at ELAG Seminar in Prague, June 2001.

drickel
Download Presentation

Practical Experimentation in Cataloging: FRBR Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FRBR: toward some practicalexperimentation in ELAG? ELAG Seminar, Prague, 6 June 2001 FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  2. ELAG FRBR I. Context Susanna Peruginelli, Florence, January 2000: "not only of a high theoretical value, but also a practical one; making it possible to integrate digital resources with "traditional" material" FRBR = FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  3. I. Context • Implementation problems? Experimentation is required! • Cataloguers’ comfort • (catalogue production devices) • Users’ comfort • (OPAC devices) FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  4. I. Context A new database  New data to feed it  Paula Goossens’ Guidelines Principles: • New creations • No MARC structure • Just XML FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  5. I. Context • 4 bibliographic families so far •  not enough! • They exist only on paper… • Here are three of them: FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  6. II. Three examplesa) a "unicellular" family (a very common case, especially for National Bibliographic Agencies) FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  7. W "Ma vie: 1912-1980" FRBNW001 E "Ma vie: 1912-1980" only available version FRBNW001-E001 M "Ma vie: 1912-1980" only available publication (1998) FRBNM001 I BNF 1999-53277 FRBNM001-I001 FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  8. a) a "unicellular" family: comments • Much redundancy: the same title three times! • Cataloguers shouldn’t have to type the same data several times • Once they’ve typed the title of a work, the catalogue production system should provide them with a "by default" proposal: Title of Manifestation = Title of Expression = Title of Work which they would change only when necessary FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  9. II. Three examplesb) "Boris Godunov" The Pushkin play, the libretto, the opera, etc… FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  10. SUP FRBNW007 FRBNW003 FRBNW005 W introduction to the play Борис Годунов FRBNW006 FRBNW002 FRBNW004 ADA COM S W Борис Годунов: libretto W illustrations for the play Борис Годунов W study about the opera Борис Годунов W Борис Годунов: opera W Борис Годунов: tragedy COM TRA TRA TRA TRA COM TRA COM E001 E001 E002 E003 E001 E002 E003 E004 E005 E001 E002 E003 E004 E001 E001 E French translation E 1869 version E 1872 version E Rimsky-K's arrangement E Russian text 1869 version E Russian text 1872 version E Russian text ed. by P. Lamm E French transl. by Lily Denis E French tr. by Delines and Laloy E Russian text E French transl. by O. Lanceray E English translation E French transl. by A. Baranoff E definitive state E original text A001 A001 A001 A 1997 recording A 1997 recording A 1962 recording FRBNM010 FRBNM002 FRBNM003 FRBNM004 FRBNM005 FRBNM006 FRBNM007 FRBNM008 FRBNM011 FRBNM009 M ca. 1922 publication M 1998 release M 1996 re-release M 1980 publication M 1937 publication M 1926 publication M 1910 publication M 1982 (Paris) publication M 1927 publication M 1982 (NYC) publication I001 I001 I001 I001 I001 I001 I001 I002 I001 I001 I001 I I I I I I I I I I I REP FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  11. II. Three examplesc) Coronelli’s "Terrestrial Globe" A 3D cartographic material which may also exist as a 2D cartographic material, which has been photographed, and about which there are electronic resources, (on CD-ROM and on the Web), and manuscript resources… FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  12. W "Coronelli, les globes de Louis XIV" : CD-ROM about Coronelli's "Globe terrestre" and "Globe céleste" W Coronelli's contract for producing his "Globe terrestre" for Louis XIV W Anonymous photograph of Coronelli's "Globe terrestre" in Lille Museum W Information from the Texas Tech Uni- versity's Web site W "Le Globe terrestre" by Vincenzo Maria Coronelli FRBNW010 FRBNW009 FRBNW008 FRBNW011 FRBNW012 E Draft E E Plate version E Globe version E E FRBNW010-E001 FRBNW009-E001 FRBNW008-E002 FRBNW008-E001 FRBNW011-E001 FRBNW012-E001 M M Published by Bibliothèque nationale de France in 1999 M M M Published by Nolin in 1690 M Published by Nolin in 1699 M Produced by [?] in 1688 FRBNM016 FRBNM015 FRBNM013 FRBNM014 FRBNM012 FRBNM017 FRBNM018 I BNF Clair. 1054 fol. 180 I BNF MDC 12 005713 I BNF Ge CC 1273(5) I BNF Ge DD 2987(82) from "Collection D'Anville" I Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Texas I Fine Arts Museum in Lille I BNF Ge D 26032 FRBNM016-I001 FRBNM015-I001 FRBNM013-I001 FRBNM014-I001 FRBNM012-I002 FRBNM012-I001 FRBNM017-I001 FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  13. III. Future developments • More than just 4 bibliographic families • Are there any volunteers? • A place, a computer, a software, and the database is done! • An opportunity: the VisualCat structure from the Danish Bibliographic Centre (thanks to Poul Henrik Jørgensen!) FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  14. III. Future developments • Two main focuses: • Ergonomics of the catalogue production system • OPAC issues FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  15. IV. Some reflections on OPACs Last year Dan Matei said: "We must get rid of traditional "Author / Title / Subject" OPACs!" • Would it really benefit our patrons? • How could this be achieved? A proposal (not an answer!): FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  16. Phrase  Word Person or Corporate Body  (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  17. Phrase  Word Person or Corporate Body  (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Person or Corporate Body Person only Corporate Body only FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  18. Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Work  (and, or, and not) Person or Corporate Body  FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  19. Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Work  (and, or, and not) Person or Corporate Body  Work Monograph only Periodical only Series only Expression Performance Manifestation FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  20. Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Work  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Object  Person or Corporate Body  FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  21. Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Work  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Object  Person or Corporate Body  Object Music instrument and/or voice Scientific instrument Item FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  22. Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Work  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Object  Concept  Person or Corporate Body  FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  23. Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Work  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Object  Concept  Person or Corporate Body  Concept Place Event Form/Genre FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  24. Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Work  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Object  (and, or, and not) Concept Date of manifestation   Person or Corporate Body  FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  25. Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Work  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Object  (and, or, and not) Concept Date of manifestation   Person or Corporate Body  Date of manifestation Date of work Date of expression Date of performance Date of event FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  26. Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Work  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Object  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Concept Date of manifestation Place of manifestation    Person or Corporate Body  FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  27. Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Work  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Object  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Date of manifestation Concept Place of manifestation    Person or Corporate Body  Place of manifestation Place of performance FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  28. Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Work  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Object  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Language of expression Date of manifestation Place of manifestation Concept     Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Person or Corporate Body  FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  29. Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Work  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Object  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Date of manifestation Language of expression Concept Place of manifestation     Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Person or Corporate Body  Language of expression Language of performance FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  30. Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Type of responsibility: (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Work  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Object  (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Concept Language of expression Place of manifestation Date of manifestation Mathematical data      Phrase  Word (and, or, and not) Phrase  Word Person or Corporate Body  FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  31. Adaptor… Manifestations Translator Parent works Publisher… Author… Expressions Owner of item… Sibling works Type of resp- onsibility Works Person Contributions Subject relations Works Corporate Bodies (membership) Works Events Corporate Bodies Expressions Conferences Exhibitions… Manifestations FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  32. V. Conclusion • We need: • Imagination • Volunteers • Funds FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

  33. Děkuji! Ďakujem! Dank U wel! Дякую! Mulţumesc! Hvala lepa! Tack så mycket! Mange tak! Dziękuję! Спасибо! Grazie! Obrigado! Takk fyrir! Tusen takk! Gracias! Köszönöm! Diolch yn fawr! Ευχαριστώ! Gracinhas! Danke schön! Go raibh maith agat! Trugarez deoc’h! Täna väga! Kiitos! Благодаря! Hvala! Eskerrik asko! Gràcies! Merci! Thanks! FRBR: toward some practical experimentation in ELAG?

More Related