410 likes | 2.24k Views
Group Members. From left to rightLe Thi Thu Tam : M9618802Doan Thi Truc Linh : M9701801Bui Tien Dung : M9701808 . OUTLINE. . . . Digital computer designed by Charles Babbage. Harvard -IBM Mark ILarge-scale automatic digital computer. Mark-8 designed by Jonathan A. Titus.
E N D
1. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AT DELL COMPUTER CORPORATION
2. Group Members
3. OUTLINE
4. The Personal Computer Industry
5. The Personal Computer Industry (cont’d)
6. The History of Dell 1983: Started in Michael Dell’s dorm room at the University of Texas
1985: Grossed $70 million in sales
1992: made the Fortune 500
Ranks 2nd in computer sales
7. The Dell Business Model Dell’s success is a combination of:
Direct sales
Home-based telephone representatives
Field-based representatives
Build-to-order
Supplier integration
8. Dell Computer Stumbles
9. In 1991: first line of portable computer
Through software and communications capabilities
significant personalization.
In 1992: with portables accounting for 17% of Dell’s sales, rumors circulated about quality problems: faulty battery packs, unreliable screens, power failures, broken hinges..
Early setback in portable computers
10. Early setback in portable computers In 1993: canceled a new line of laptops under development (too slow and expensive)
Desktops division had racked up unit volume increases of 155% but notebook sales had slipped to just 6% of Dell sales.
Dell recall 17,000 notebooks
Launching a new line of notebooks , name “Latitude”
13. Dell’s Latitude development Project (cont)
14. Battery Technology
15. NiMH and NiCad Battery
16. LiOn Battery
17. Dell’s solution
18. Option 1Continue with a proven battery technology(NiHi)
19. Option2Go with the new battery technology(LiOn)
20. Option 3aDual development
21. Option 3bOverdesign
22. Discussion question
23. Competition between four options
24. Function to analyze sensitivity Option 1: $485m
Option 2: 349.5 x p + 234.5
Option 3a: 99 x p + 482.5
Option 3b: 97.02 x p 475.1
With p: probability of LiOn success
25. Sensitivity analysis
26. Sensitivity analysis (cont’d)
27. Sensitivity analysis (cont’d)