1 / 36

ACP Project 3.2 Efficient use of energy resource in cane processing

ACP Project 3.2 Efficient use of energy resource in cane processing. Mid-Term Review 2 October 2012 MSIRI Réduit Mauritius. Implementing Institution: MSIRI. EUR0 708, 526. Budget. Participants. 12 ACP Countries . C aribbean. P acific. A frica. The Project. Capacity Building.

duane
Download Presentation

ACP Project 3.2 Efficient use of energy resource in cane processing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ACP Project 3.2 Efficient use of energy resource in cane processing Mid-Term Review 2October 2012 MSIRI Réduit Mauritius

  2. Implementing Institution: MSIRI EUR0 708, 526 Budget

  3. Participants 12 ACP Countries Caribbean Pacific Africa

  4. The Project Capacity Building Enhance the competitiveness of ACP sugar factories Through efficient use of energy resource

  5. Phases I I II II III Jan 2011 Oct 2011

  6. Consultants sent to 11 ACP countries - (26 factories) Phase I • Consultancy service – On site recommendations • Create Awareness • Identify Training Needs • Jamaica • Guyana • Burkina Faso • Tanzania • Burundi • Uganda • Cameroon • Rwanda • Zambia • Madagascar • Côte D’Ivoire Fiji

  7. Consultancy Service – On site Recommendations

  8. Consultancy Service – On site Recommendations Meeting Management Meeting with factory owner

  9. Create Awareness on Energy Efficient Practices Meeting Key Factory Staffs

  10. Create Awareness on Energy Efficient Practices Mauritius as an Example

  11. Assess Training Needs

  12. Reporting Factory data collected by consultants & discussed Electricity export potential assessed

  13. Electricity production No Electricity (GWh) Potential (GWh) @ 44 bar, 440’C 1 import 38.6 2 import 12.2 3 import 9.2 6/26 4 import 31.1 5 import 43.1 6 import 0 @ 20 tch 134 GWh/year

  14. Electricity production No Electricity export (GWh) Potential (GWh) @ 44 bar, 440’C 1 0 18.0 2 0 7.2 3 0 50.7 4 0 17.0 5 0 14.5 6 0 5.8 12/26 7 0 22.4 8 0 1.7 @ 21 bar 9 0 40.4 10 0 85.2 11 0 28.8 12 0 43.8 0 335 GWh/year

  15. Electricity production No Electricity export (GWh) Potential (GWh) @ 44 bar, 440’C 7/26 1 1.2 MWh export 137.0 2 13.0 MWh export 103.0 3 Factory vicinity 28.0 5 9.5 22.9 5 8.2 21.4 6 0 (action taken) 83.1 7 Moderate export 64.8 < 100 460 GWh/year

  16. Software Developed Phase I • Training purposes • Applicable for Energy audit & consultancy service

  17. English & French Option

  18. Menu • Process steam requirement • Turbo power simulation • Potential electricity export • Orifice plate design • Efficiency losses in boiler

  19. Outcome of Phase I • Made “On-site” recommendations • Minimize energy consumption by the factories in the short term • Raised awareness • Using Mauritius as an example • Software developed • Created an environment congenial for promoting cooperation among the ACP countries

  20. Phase II I II II III Oct 2011 Aug 2011

  21. 40 participants attended 3 training sessions (16 days stay on average) Phase II • Academic Training • Exposure

  22. Training Programme - MQA Approved

  23. Field Visit

  24. Experience Sharing

  25. Factory visit

  26. Power Plant

  27. Support from local non-sugar firms • Support from local non-sugar firms

  28. Forges Tardieu

  29. Outcome of Phase II • Contributed to Capacity Building of ACP staffs through training and exposure • Created an environment congenial for promoting cooperation & possibly business opportunities

  30. Phase III I II III III Expected to start in 2013 2015 ?

  31. Main objectives Phase III • Follow-up consultancy support services will be provided by the MSIRI throughsite visits if required • The MSIRI will assist in the identification of development prospects through site visits

  32. Objective 1 Phase III • Follow-up consultancy support services will be provided by the MSIRI throughsite visits if required • Our support is not expected for changes, e.g., • Investing in better cane preparation technologies to increase electricity & sugar production • Boiler or Turbo upgrade or electrification of mills

  33. Objective 1 Phase III • Follow-up consultancy support services will be provided by the MSIRI throughsite visits if required • Requested support • Feasibility study for a new co-generation plant in Madagascar (Business Plan) • Expertise on trash recovery to increase electricity export in a Tanzanian mill • Publication of an article to create awareness in their region • An updated version of software, with graphic display • Other demands – not applicable • Expertise on special sugar • Expertise to improve mill performance, front to end (popular demand – short term priority)

  34. Objective 2 Phase III • The MSIRI will assist in the identification of development prospects through site visits • Some site visits may be justified • Normally, ACP participants that attended the training sessions in Mauritius have achieved this capability

  35. Proposals Phase III • Reorientsome activities of the project that can benefit ACP countries, specifically • R&D on “Trash Processing” for electricity production in ACP countries, including Mauritian factories • Upgrade software and offer freely to ACP participants, including Mauritius

  36. Thank You

More Related