1 / 2

Supernova remnants in the AKARI FIS All-Sky Survey

Il- Gyo Jeong , Bon- Chul Koo(Seoul National Univ.), Ho- Gyu Lee (The University of Tokyo). Distributions of Known SNRs. Supernova remnants in the AKARI FIS All-Sky Survey. Why Far-IR for SNRs ???. IR detection rate. ► All-Sky Survey • IRAS

duc
Download Presentation

Supernova remnants in the AKARI FIS All-Sky Survey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Il-GyoJeong, Bon-Chul Koo(Seoul National Univ.), Ho-Gyu Lee (The University of Tokyo) Distributions of Known SNRs Supernova remnants in the AKARI FIS All-Sky Survey Why Far-IR for SNRs ??? IR detection rate ► All-Sky Survey • IRAS - Arendt et al. (1989): 19% (30/157) - Saken et al. (1992): 22% (35/161) • AKARI - This work: 23% (63/274) ► Glimpse Field (65°>|l|>10°, |b|<1°) - IRAS: 17% (Arendt et al. 1989), 18% (Saken et al. 1992) - Spitzer IRAC band: 16% (16/100; Lee 2005) 20% (18/95; Reach et al. 2006) - Spitzer MIPS band: 32% (39/121; Goncalves et al. 2011) - This work: 26% (31/121) • Observations of SNRs are relatively rare in far-IR. • The swept-up dust is the major coolant of a SNR and plays a role • in the SNR evolution. • Far-IR is a better means of studying the dust formed during the • process of supernova explosion. • Far-IR is more sensitive to old supernova remnants. • Far-IR emission is enhanced, where a SNR interacts with dense • ISM.

  2. Morphological Type of Far-IR emission •Shell Type – 19/63 (30%) ex) 3C391 (7’X5’) • Central Brightened Type – 44/63 ex) G349.7+0.2 (2.5’X2’) Far-IR (WL, N160) bright SNR • SED fitting result (distance: 1.5kpc) - Tdust: 19 ~ 78 K, - Mdust: 0.02 ~ 32 M (Data: IRAS(24, 60, 100μm) + AKARI) • IC443 (G189.1+3.0; 45’) → White circles (1~3): shocked molecular regions (Snell et al. 2005). → Bright Far-IR emissions show spatial agreement with shocked molecular region. These features show the evidence of the shocked medium.

More Related