190 likes | 502 Views
SilverPipe 6.1. Pipeline Integrity Management Software. About DNV Software. DNV Software is the commercial software house of DNV, serving more than 3,500 customers 2012: > 300 employees, NOK 430 mill in revenue (80% external, 20% internal DNV)
E N D
SilverPipe 6.1 Pipeline Integrity Management Software
About DNV Software • DNV Software is the commercial software house of DNV, serving more than 3,500 customers • 2012: > 300 employees, NOK 430 mill in revenue(80% external, 20% internal DNV) • Our focus markets: Oil & gas, offshore, refineries, petrochemical and maritime industries • 50+ years experience in developing quality software based on Det Norske Veritas’ leading industry knowledge and expertise. • Focus on developing products and services delivering on our customers business needs • LONG LASTING CUSTOMER RELATIONS • Professional support and maintenance services • Customers involved in long term software direction
Risk and Integrity Management Software for the oil & gas industry • Midstream • Gathering • Transportation • Storage • Downstream • Refining • Processing • Distribution • Upstream • Exploration • Drilling • Production
DNV Integration Framework Software Deliverables Integrity Management Dashboard • Aggregated Management Risks - Traffic Lights & Drilldown - Management KPI Overview SilverPipe SIM IDS • Onshore Pipelines • Offshore Pipelines • Wellhead • Tanks • Risers • Subsea templates • Offshore Platforms • Floating Structures • Pressure equipment • Tanks • Rotating equipment • Safety release valves • Gas & Oil processing • LNG processing & offloading - ArcGIS interface - SAP interface - Scada interfaces Website & Security Framework Open Integration Standards BusinessRules Ease of use Search Workflow
SilverPipe - From well to terminal • Dashboards Executive Workspace • Assesses condition andidentifies anomalies • Assesses risk Engineering Workspace Risk Workspace • Company-wide accessto pipeline information • Secures compliance withintegrity policies Data Management Workspace Compliance Workspace • SilverPipe Engine Configurable to your corporate risk and integrity management strategy
SilverPipe focuses on customer’s needs Meet regulations Availability Minimise spending Extend asset life
Case: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Pipeline Rupture and Fire • In 2010 in San Bruno, California a Pacific Gas & Electric national gas pipeline ruptured killing eight people. This is a very high profile pipeline failure in the U.S. Everyone in the pipeline industry knows about it and doesn’t want to be the next PG&E. The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board Accident Report stated: • “PG&E's pipeline integrity management program, which should have ensured the safety of the system, was deficient and ineffective because it – • Was based on incomplete and inaccurate pipeline information. • Did not consider the design and materials contribution to the risk of a pipeline failure. • Failed to consider the presence of previously identified welded seam cracks as part of its risk assessment. • Resulted in the selection of an examination method that could not detect welded seam defects. • Led to internal assessments of the program that were superficial and resulted in no improvements. “
6.1 Release Planned Custom SilverPipe Modules Risk Screening Assessments: - System - Route - Component - Hotspot Risk Browser Data Viewer System Data Results GIS Viewer Risk Overview Results Survey Monitoring Analysis Risk Screening DocumentsReports Plan Execution Rolling IM plan IM projects Comments Man. IM requirements Events and Activities Improved monitoring Improved reports System Data Line, Route, Component Centerline Materials Regulatory Operational Environment… Anomaly Management
Design data: SilverPipe holds linearly referenced model SilverPipe model: Linearly referenced line and section GIS model The pipelines as they are
Both Lines and Sections have Linear Reference 0 40 110 190 200 Pipeline System • Consists of lines: A, B, C, D, and E in region B Line • Linear reference: Begin: 0 km End: 200 km Section 1 Linear reference: Begin: 0 km End: 40 km • Section 2 • Linear reference: • Begin: -5 km • End: 65 km • Section 3 • Linear reference: • Begin: 0 km • End: 80 km • Section 4 • Linear reference: • Begin: 0 km • End: 10 km
SilverPipe has a comprehensive Risk Module Threat group Assessment scope Route assessment Dynamic segmentation PoF development Risk aggregation Assessment’s Validity Risk Matrix CoF model Hotspot risk Risk Browser PoF model Threat Component risk Risk Screening Route summary Risk Tools It is all about robust risk based decisions
SilverPipe Risk Module Robust risk based decisions Engineers’ judgement is paramount, all assessments require reasoning. We don’t believe in “the risk button” The structured risk process ensures accountability and traceability throughout Scope Risk Assessment per threat Route CoF, PoF per threat Hotspots & components risk Route Summary Screening encodes known risk factors in re-usable, extendable models.Dramatically improves process effectiveness One matrix ensures balanced judgement of risk Aligns the qualitative and quantitative assessments on a common frame of reference
Why semi-quantitative risk model is chosen Coverage information & risk models full Risk OK scant qualitative semi-quantitative quantitative
Data management at every step, evaluation to jump to next Need for qualitative judgement increases for each step Risk Result Each step require data transformation and appropriate models. Insecurities are implied, i.e. spatial generalisations or applicability of model assumptions. Therefore, both the significance and need for careful qualitative judgement increase. Analysis Result Survey Result SilverPipe offers data management at every step Inputfeature sets for all information types through .csv files, and upload document. Output on web page, data viewer and document archive. System data
Example configuration of the data management steps System data Survey Result Analysis Result Risk Result Anode Anode Status CP Condition Ext Corrosion Position (point) Type Material Length Thickness Weight Installed date Comments Position (point) In place? Type Consumption <10% 10 – 40% 40-90% >90% Description Position (segment) Condition good fair poor Reasoning Position (segment) CoF value PoF value Risk Comment • Other input to screening • rule for ext corrosion
Safeguarding life, property and the environment www.dnv.com