1 / 7

ERS 669 – Team Research Project

ERS 669 – Team Research Project. “Changes That Work: Evaluating Household Energy Reduction Technologies ” Conrad ______, Eric Liberda, Stephen Mooney, and Michael Pelton (names in apha order). Purpose and Objective.

duke
Download Presentation

ERS 669 – Team Research Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ERS 669 – Team Research Project “Changes That Work: Evaluating Household Energy Reduction Technologies” Conrad ______, Eric Liberda, Stephen Mooney, and Michael Pelton (names in apha order)

  2. Purpose and Objective • Determine most acceptable ways of reducing GHG emissions related to household energy systems. • Focus on energy management that will ultimately reduce total demand load and reduce GHG emissions. • In Ontario, this means: • reducing electricity use during the day • switching appropriate loads to natural gas, • reducing natural gas consumption.

  3. Method • 1. Implement different programs in 4 groups of 10 homes for a period of 8 weeks during the winter and summer. The programs range in scale, complexity, end user involvement, and changes to daily activities. • 2. Collect and analyze energy usage data related to effect of program changes. Correlate results with a projection of a potential greater effect on the provincial energy system. • 3. Survey participants to determine attitudes, education value, willingness to continue with project, and comments for improvement.

  4. Scenario parameters • Usage type: residential, commercial • Density: parents/children, employees etc, per unit area • Social setting/ neighbourhood • Study participants: 10 / scenario • Load focus: Lighting, Heating, Cooling, Cooking, Refrigerator, Dryer, Electronics, Small appliances – hair dryers, fans etc.

  5. Program options • Small Scale: small changes, no real inconvenience, maybe a slow cooker/micro/toaster oven • Medium Scale: lifestyle usage patterns, update, eliminate • High Scale: high-tech, geo-thermal, control systems, keep lifestyle

  6. The Scenarios (beta version) • Scenario 1 – “The Basics” • Residential – 2 parents, 2 children, similar neighbourhood, similar size houses • CFL light bulbs, low flow shower head, leak proofing • slow cooker, smaller oven • Scenario 2 – “The Basics” • Industrial – Small business • CFL light bulbs, light motion detectors, smart taps • Scenario 3 – “High Tech” • Residential - 2 parents, 2 children, similar neighbourhood, similar size houses • Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) – Co-generation (or PEMs etc..) • Scenario 4 – “High Tech” • Industrial – Geo-thermal system ( can we do that?)

  7. With 4 scenarios, we loose the middle of the road attempt.. • What I did was make a residential and industrial equiv. for both high and low – feel free to change that • Still need a “research question” • I’m available to meet any time on Monday (obviously before class)

More Related