370 likes | 627 Views
Findings & Discussion. 1. What are the students' attitudes toward the current language-skill courses? 2. What are the students' attitudes toward the proposed course reform (content vs. skills)? 3. For the students, what is an ideal language program?.
E N D
Findings & Discussion • 1. What are the students' attitudes toward the current language-skill courses? • 2. What are the students' attitudes toward the proposed course reform (content vs. skills)? • 3. For the students, what is an ideal language program?
Students' attitudes toward the current language-skill courses
Students' attitudes toward the current language-skill courses
Students' attitudes toward the current language-skill courses
Students' attitudes toward the current language-skill courses
Students' attitudes toward the current language-skill courses
Attitudes Based on Future Career Intentions – Graduate School
Comments Related to Eliminating Language Training Classes • 8. 您是否認為可以完全刪除聽、說、讀、寫方面的課程?□①不可以 □②應該不可以 □③無意見 □④應該可以 □⑤可以 • 8a. 請說明您的理由
Comments Related to Eliminating Language Training Classes • 8. Do you want to eliminate all the LSRW classes? 1) No, I do not. 2) Maybe not. 3) No comments. 4) Maybe. 5) Yes, I do. • 8a. Why? • Likert Scale Score: 1.26
Comments Related to Eliminating Language Training Classes • Strongly negative response • 53 out of 96 informants commented • Only 3 comments favored eliminating language training classes • 4 skills already practiced in Literature and Linguistics classes
Comments Related to Eliminating Language Training Classes • Most comments against eliminating language training classes • 28 comments were against the proposal • Core skills in English language learning • 19 comments questioned the effectiveness of the plan • Cannot improve language ability in the content classes
Comments Related to Developing English Skills Through Content Classes • 9. 如果把所有的語言課程與必修之文學、語言學或英語教學課程整合,也就是說沒有單獨存在的聽、說、讀、寫語言訓練課程了﹙例如老師上文學課時也同時訓練聽、說、讀、寫能力﹚,您覺得可行嗎?□①很不可行 □②應該不可行 □③無意見 □④應該可行 □⑤很可行 • 9a. 請說明您的理由
Comments Related to Developing English Skills Through Content Classes • 9. If we combine the skills classes with content classes and do not have separate LSRW classes, would you agree? 1) No, I would not. 2) Maybe not. 3) No comments. 4) Maybe. 5) Yes, I would. • 9a. Why? • Likert Scale Score: 2.35
Comments Related to Developing English Skills Through Content Classes • Negative response • 60 of 96 informants commented • 9 comments favorable • Follow the model in English speaking countries • Improve listening ability • 8 comments state content classes should be taught in Chinese
Comments Related to Developing English Skills Through Content Classes • 51 comments negative • Too much to cover already (13 comments) • Content classes should be taught in Chinese (8 comments) • Unable to master 4 skills (30 comments)
Comments Related to Eliminating Language Training Classes • 10.不同於上題,如果保留現有聽、說、讀、寫的課程,但以文學、語言學或英語教學等為教學內容主題﹙例如「英文作文﹙語言學主題﹚」或「英文作文﹙英國文學主題﹚」﹚,您覺得可行嗎?□①很不可行 □②應該不可行 □③無意見 □④應該可行 □⑤很可行 • 10a.請說明您的理由
Comments Related to Eliminating Language Training Classes • 10. Different from the last question, if the skills classes are kept and taught with topics of lit, linguistics, or TESOL, would you agree? 1) No, I would not. 2) Maybe not. 3) No comments. 4) Maybe. 5) Yes, I would. • 10a. Why? • Likert Scale Score: 3.38
Comments Related to Eliminating Language Training Classes • Only 43 comments are made. • 22 are against the proposal. • Content may be too difficult for students to learn and for teachers to teach. • Students want to learn more practical content and develop global views.
Comments Related to Eliminating Language Training Classes • 17 are for the proposal. • To get more professional training. • Positive-Reinforces content knowledge • 4 are ambivalent.
Comments Related to Improving the Current Language Training Program • 11. 這次的語言課程改革中,您覺得有哪些既有狀況必須藉機改進? • 11. With the curriculum being revised, do you think any improvements need to be made to the status quo?
Comments Related to Improving the Current Language Training Program • 73 of 96 informants commented • Negative Comments • Positive Comments • Department Policy Comments
Comments Related to Improving the Current Language Training Program • 91 Negative Comment Issues • 15 Curriculum related comments • Course content comments • 23 Oral Training • 5 Writing • 14 General • Teaching methodology comments
Comments Related to Improving the Current Language Training Program • 7 Positive Comments • Praise for Curriculum, Content, and Teachers • Teacher comments included both negative and positive views
Comments Related to Improving the Current Language Training Program • 21 Department Policy Comments • 12 General comments • 9 Desire for more Language Training hour comments
Comments Related to Improving the Current Language Training Program • Summary of Comments • Strongest negative issues • Variability in content and quality between sections • More practical content • More chances to practice
Comments Related to How Student Achievement Can Improve • 12. 這次的語言課程改革中,您覺得有哪些新重點必須設法納入以強化同學們的學習成果? • 12. With the curriculum being revised, what are the new guidelines that should be included to improve students' achievements?
Comments Related to How Student Achievement Can Improve • 60 of 96 informants commented • 9 comments related to improving the curriculum • More classes, unified guidelines • 23 comments related to general class content • More practical language use
Comments Related to How Student Achievement Can Improve • 15 comments related to improving oral training classes • More chances to speak; learn presentation skills • 2 comments related to improving writing classes • Practical topics; grammar correction • 15 comments related to improving teaching quality • More opportunities to speak in class • 7 comments were related to department policy • Increase number of language training classes
Comments Related to How Student Achievement Can Improve • Summary of Comments • More classes • More practical content • More chances to speak