1 / 18

Millennium Challenge Corporation June 24, 2005

2005 Environmental Sustainability Index Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship. Millennium Challenge Corporation June 24, 2005. Designing & Building an Indicator. Daniel C. Esty Yale University. 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index Partners. Constructing the ESI.

Download Presentation

Millennium Challenge Corporation June 24, 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship Millennium Challenge Corporation June 24, 2005 Designing & Building an Indicator Daniel C. Esty Yale University

  2. 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index Partners

  3. Constructing the ESI 76 variables 21 indicators equally weighted average 5 components ESI Score

  4. 76 Variables 21 Indicators 5 Components • Nitrogen dioxide concentration • Sulfur dioxide concentration • Particulate concentration • Indoor air quality Air Quality • Ecoregions at risk • Threatened birds • Threatened mammals • Threatened amphibians • National Biodiversity Index Biodiversity Environmental Systems Land • Wilderness area • Developed area • Dissolved oxygen • Electrical conductivity • Suspended solids • Phosphorus concentration Water Quality Water Quantity • Surface water availability • Groundwater availability • Coal consumption • Nitrogen oxide emissions • Sulfur dioxide emissions • VOC emissions • Vehicles in use Reducing Air Pollution Reducing Ecosystem Stress • Forest cover change • Acidification Reducing Population Pressure • Population growth • Total fertility rate Reducing Stresses Reducing Waste & Consumption Pressures • Hazardous waste generation • Ecological Footprint • Waste recycling rates • Industrial organic effluents • Fertilizer consumption • Pesticide consumption • Area under water stress Reducing Water Stress • Overfishing • Sustainably managed forests • Market distortions • Salinization due to irrigation • Agricultural subsidies Natural Resources Management • Deaths from intestinal infect. diseases • Child mortality rate • Child mortality due to respiratory infections Environmental Health Reducing Human Vulnerability Basic Human Sustenance • Malnutrition • Safe drinking water supply • Casualties due to environmental disasters • Environmental Hazard Exposure Index Exposure to Natural Disasters • Gasoline price • Corruption • Government effectiveness • Protected land area • Environmental governance • Strength of rule of law • Civil and political liberties • Sustainable development data gaps • International environmental engagement • Environmental knowledge creation • Democratic institutions • Local Agenda 21 initiatives Environmental Governance Social and Institutional Capacity Energy Efficiency • Energy efficiency • Renewable energy production • Corporate sustainability (Dow Jones) • Corporate sustainability (Innovest) • ISO 14001 certified companies • Private sector environmental innovation • Participation in Responsible Care Program Private Sector Responsiveness • University enrollment • Research scientists • Innovation capacity • Digital Access Index • Female primary education Science and Technology • Intergovernmental environmental activities • Role in intl. environmental aid • Participation in intl. environmental agreements Participation in International Collaborative Efforts Global Stewardship Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Greenhouse gas emissions / GDP • Greenhouse gas emissions / capita • Transboundary sulfur dioxide spillovers • Polluting-goods imports Reducing Transboundary Environmental Pressures

  5. Indicator Construction Indicator Component Variables • NO2 concentration • SO2 concentration • Particulate concentration • Indoor air quality Environmental Systems Air Quality

  6. ESI Rankings Top Ten Bottom Ten Other Countries

  7. Peer groups Multiple perspectives income-based geographic political / trade groupings statistically derived Key to Policy Leverage

  8. Bottom Quintile 4th Quintile 3rd Quintile 2nd Quintile Top Quintile ESI Country Scores by Quintile

  9. Cluster Analysis: ESI Characteristic-Based Country Groupings

  10. Better policy management Improved performance and results Benchmarking – shows what is possible Competitiveness pressure leaders and laggards best practices Why Measure?

  11. Supports merit-based aid Helps clarify what is “meritorious” Makes decisionmaking more objective Application in MCC Context

  12. No purely “objective” criteria Data limitations are significant Measurement challenges should not be an excuse to withhold aid But note:

  13. Elements of effective and credible index • Theoretical foundation • Openness about strengths and weaknesses • Transparent methodology • Published data • Crosscheck – peer review • Sensitivity analysis (JRC)

  14. Environment is a hard topic to capture multidimensional issue divergent priorities and values Companies invest in measurement so should MCC A sound analytic framework cannot be developed on the cheap MCC Issues to Consider

  15. What to Measure? • Choices • Outcomes • Inputs (efforts) • Processes • Trends • Targets • Absolute • Relative • How to fill data gaps

  16. MCC Evaluation of Options • Seek a credible capacity to deliver • Emphasize an operational set of indicators • Stress experience and a proven track record • Look for a clear action blueprint • What issues to track • Where data will come from • How to check/verify data • Strategy for revising and updating

  17. Sensitivity Analysis • Checks the robustness of the rankings • Evaluates sensitivity to the assumptions and aggregation methods utilized

  18. The 2005 ESI is available at: www.yale.edu/esi

More Related