1 / 15

Fragile X Syndrome - Clinical

Fragile X Syndrome Test strategy, analysis and interpretation in a familial case involving skewed methylation Sarah Burton-Jones Bristol Genetics Laboratory Cardiff Training Day 15 th October 2008. Fragile X Syndrome - Clinical. Accounts for >¼ cases X-linked learning disability

Download Presentation

Fragile X Syndrome - Clinical

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fragile X SyndromeTest strategy, analysis and interpretation in a familial case involving skewed methylationSarah Burton-JonesBristol Genetics LaboratoryCardiff Training Day 15th October 2008

  2. Fragile X Syndrome - Clinical • Accounts for >¼ cases X-linked learning disability • Symptoms (generally milder in females): • Developmental delay, especially speech • Low IQ (20-60, may decrease with age) • Macrocephaly, long narrow face, large ears • Autism; shyness, poor eye contact, social anxiety • Behavioural problems, ADHD • Carriers • ~20% Female carriers experience Premature Ovarian Failure • Males (and females) at risk of FXTAS,~30% males <age 60 • Only female carriers are at risk of having affected offspring • Approx. 800 test requests per year at Bristol lab. • Majority of diagnostic referrals come from Paediatrics

  3. Fragile X Laboratory Testing • Detection of expansion in (CGG)n repeat tract in 5’ untranslated region of FMR1 at Xq27.3, FRAXA • Initial screen by FRAXA PCR; primers flank (CGG)n repeat tract, products visualised as peaks on Beckman CEQ analyser, run includes size controls • Default to Southern blot for: PCR failure, female with only one peak, family history of Fragile X • Current CMGS classification guidelines (2005): • Normal <50 (CGG) repeats, modal value = 30 • Intermediate 50-58 repeats • Premutation 59-200 repeats (unmethylated) • Full mutation >200 repeats (methylated) • Recent audit at Bristol showed pick up <2% FM, ~4% PM and <1% IM

  4. 29r Female index case Index case referral • 9 year old female • Request form: Accommodative esotropia (form of squint in which one or both eyes turns inward) • Further info obtained: Learning difficulties, language problems, mild social problems • Karyotype and Fragile X test requested • Result of FRAXA PCR/fragment analysis: 1 allele peak, sized at 29 repeats  Southern blot

  5. Ox 0.55 kb (Pfxa32) Ox 1.9 kb (StB 12.3) ~ 500kb (CGG)n Centromeric Telomeric FMR1 (38kb) FMR2 ~ 0.8kb ~ 1.0kb ~ 5.1kb ~ 2.8kb (unmethylated) ~ 5.2kb ~ 12kb Routine blot Prenatal blot Sizing blot Eco RI Bst ZI / Eag I (methylation specific) Pst I Probe Hin dIII Bgl II FRAXA Southern blot analysis Not to scale!

  6. 29r,102r 5.2kb (Xi) 2.8kb (Xa) EcoRI+BstZI*/Ox1.9 routine Southern blot Normal and fullmutation alleles in patient N, P P/F, - N, P N, - N, N *EagI now used in place of BstZI (isoschizomer)

  7. 31r Mother of FM female Father of FM female ? Parental samples (PCR/Fragment Analysis) Both parents Southern blot

  8. 29r,102r 5.2kb (Xi) 2.8kb (Xa) N, P N, N N, N N, F Parental samples (Ox1.9 Southern blot analysis) Normal and methylated expansion alleles in mother of proband Premutation with skewed methylation due to Xi, or (small) full mutation?

  9. 29r,102r 0.8kb N, P Mother (PstI /Ox0.55 Southern blot for sizing) Expansion in mother sized by marker scale on blot as ~123 repeats Therefore, can we call this a large premutation in the mother, as opposed to small full mutation?

  10. Maternal grandmother 23r 82r 32r Maternal grandfather Maternal grandparents (PCR/fragment analysis)

  11. 29r,102r 5.2kb (Xi) 2.8kb (Xa) Maternal grandparents (routine Southern blot) Normal and unmethylated premutation alleles in grandmother of proband Some degree of skew visible? N, P N, N I,- N, P

  12. Fragile X family pedigree N,- 32r N,P 23r, 82r N,- ?r N,P 31r, ~123r N,F 29r, >200r

  13. UKNEQAS scheme 2007 • Question 1: female with similar analysis results to mother of affected girl in this pedigree • Repeat sizes 30 and ~150 (CGG) • ‘Premutation’ expansion fully methylated on Southern blot, or at least showing extreme skew • Report as full mutation, premutation, or not specified? • Best practice guidelines state: • ‘large premutations may be distinguished from full mutations by their unmethylated status on active X chromosomes’ • Led to introduction of new report phrase in Bristol lab: • ‘This result showed an expanded methylated allele associated with apparently complete methylation. However, we are unable to distinguish between a large premutation showing strongly skewed X-inactivation and a small full mutation.’

  14. To consider… Is the girl’s mother (31r, 123rM) at risk of POF and/or FXTAS? • Methylation of FMR1 promoter silencestranscription in full mutation cases (synaptic transmission downregulated) • Symptoms in unmethylated-premutation carriers are due to RNA gain of function, overexpression of FMR1 containing expansion, sequestration of CGGBPs • A female full mutation carrier would not normally be counselled for POF risk • Risk of POF does correlate with expansion size1 and those with >100 (CGG) unlikely to have POF. 1 Sullivan et al 2005

  15. Conclusions • Report cases of apparent complete skew or ‘methylated premutation’ with care! • An expansion has been detected • Offer prenatal diagnosis • Clinical Genetics team may counsel that there remains a risk of POF and FXTAS Be aware of limitations of PCR and Southern blot testing • DNA obtained from peripheral blood may not reflect methylation status in the brain • Relatively poor sensitivity of blot may misrepresent skew • Unable to distinguish between a truly methylated (full) mutation and a severely skewed premutation • May be necessary to review classification guidelines to clarify definitions of ‘full’ and ‘pre’ and the implications

More Related