450 likes | 771 Views
Digitally Controlled Oscillators (DCO). Alicia Klinefelter ECE 7332 Spring 2011. Outline. Basic Topology of All Digital PLLs (ADPLL) Where does the DCO fit in? Early Architectures Oscillator Background Current Research Seminal: All Digital Control [14]
E N D
Digitally Controlled Oscillators (DCO) Alicia Klinefelter ECE 7332 Spring 2011
Outline • Basic Topology of All Digital PLLs (ADPLL) • Where does the DCO fit in? • Early Architectures • Oscillator Background • Current Research • Seminal: All Digital Control [14] • Digitally controlled oscillator (DCO)-based architecture for RF frequency synthesis in a deep-submicrometer CMOS Process • Hysteresis Delay Cell [9] • A Sub-10-μW Digitally Controlled Oscillator Based on Hysteresis Delay Cell Topologies for WBAN Applications • Portability [2] • An Ultra-Low-Power and Portable Digitally Controlled Oscillator for SoC Applications • Frequency Acquisition and Locking [4] • A 1.7mW all digital phase-locked loop with new gain generator and low power DCO • SubthresholdOperation [10] • A 100μW, 1.9GHz oscillator with fully digital frequency tuning • Comparison of Results
Why are ADPLLs useful? • Problems with analog implementation • Design and verification • Settling time • 20 – 30 msin CPPLLs • 10 ms in the ADPLL • Implementation cost • Custom blocks • Loop Filter • High Leakage current • Large capacitor (2) area • Charge Pump • Low output resistance • Mismatch between charging current and discharging current • Phase offset and reference spurs
All-digital PLL (ADPLL) TOPOLOGY DCO ref(t) Digital Loop Filter Time-to-Digital Converter (TDC) out(t) Divider
ADPLL: Time-to-digital converter • Delay chain structure sets resolution • Mismatch causes linearity issues • Resolution: want low quantization noise DCO ref(t) Digital Loop Filter Time-to-Digital Converter (TDC) out(t) div(t) Divider • Architectures [1, Perrott]
ADPLL: DIGITAL LOOP FILTER • Compact area • Insensitive to leakage DCO ref(t) Digital Loop Filter Time-to-Digital Converter (TDC) out(t) Divider
ADPLL: DCO • Replaces the VCO from analog implementations • Consumes 50-70% of overall ADPLL power • Generally consists of a digital controller implementing frequency acquisition algorithm and oscillator. DCO ref(t) Digital Loop Filter Time-to-Digital Converter (TDC) out(t) Divider
METRICS • Power Consumption @ Frequency • Phase Noise • Measured with respect to a frequency offset from the carrier • The units, dBm/Hz, define noise power contained in a 1 Hz bandwidth • Jitter • LSB Resolution (ps) • Tuning range • Note: bit resolution is rarely mentioned • Does not seem to have drastic impact on tuning range
Outline • Basic Topology of All Digital PLLs (ADPLL) • Where does the DCO fit in? • Early Architectures • Oscillator Background • Current Research • Seminal: All Digital Control [14] • Digitally controlled oscillator (DCO)-based architecture for RF frequency synthesis in a deep-submicrometer CMOS Process • Hysteresis Delay Cell [9] • A Sub-10-μW Digitally Controlled Oscillator Based on Hysteresis Delay Cell Topologies for WBAN Applications • Portability [2] • An Ultra-Low-Power and Portable Digitally Controlled Oscillator for SoC Applications • Frequency Acquisition and Locking [4] • A 1.7mW all digital phase-locked loop with new gain generator and low power DCO • SubthresholdOperation [10] • A 100μW, 1.9GHz oscillator with fully digital frequency tuning • Comparison of Results
EARLY ARCHITECTURES: ANALOG TUNING • Straightforward approach • DAC + VCO • Varactors used initially • Problem with varactors: • Capacitance not very linear with input voltage. • For digital tuning, need flat regions. [3, Xu]
Outline • Basic Topology of All Digital PLLs (ADPLL) • Where does the DCO fit in? • Early Architectures • Oscillator Background • Current Research • Seminal: All Digital Control [14] • Digitally controlled oscillator (DCO)-based architecture for RF frequency synthesis in a deep-submicrometer CMOS Process • Hysteresis Delay Cell [9] • A Sub-10-μW Digitally Controlled Oscillator Based on Hysteresis Delay Cell Topologies for WBAN Applications • Portability [2] • An Ultra-Low-Power and Portable Digitally Controlled Oscillator for SoC Applications • Frequency Acquisition and Locking [4] • A 1.7mW all digital phase-locked loop with new gain generator and low power DCO • SubthresholdOperation [10] • A 100μW, 1.9GHz oscillator with fully digital frequency tuning • Comparison of Results
OSCILLATORS: Ring oscillator • Frequency determined by delay of the inverters • Each stage provides phase shift where • Supply voltage • Easy to integrate • High phase noise → Not good for RF applications • Current starved → high resolution, high static power due to current source
OSCILLATORS: Lc oscillator • Low phase noise • dissipates only of the total energy stored during one cycle. • Complicated layout • High area 240um [4, Thiel]
Outline • Basic Topology of All Digital PLLs (ADPLL) • Where does the DCO fit in? • Early Architectures • Oscillator Background • Current Research • Seminal: All Digital Control [14] • Digitally controlled oscillator (DCO)-based architecture for RF frequency synthesis in a deep-submicrometer CMOS Process • Hysteresis Delay Cell [9] • A Sub-10-μW Digitally Controlled Oscillator Based on Hysteresis Delay Cell Topologies for WBAN Applications • Portability [2] • An Ultra-Low-Power and Portable Digitally Controlled Oscillator for SoC Applications • Frequency Acquisition and Locking [4] • A 1.7mW all digital phase-locked loop with new gain generator and low power DCO • SubthresholdOperation [10] • A 100μW, 1.9GHz oscillator with fully digital frequency tuning • Comparison of Results
NOVELTY: FULLY DIGITAL TUNING • Weighted capacitor networks replaced varactors • Concept of fine and coarse tuning introduced • Coarse (binary weighted) lacks monotonicity • Fine (unit weighted) has monotonicity but complex control
TECHNIQUE : dithering • To increase resolution, many systems use ΣΔ modulators for dithering the input to the unit caps. • Unit cap determines gain of DCO • Recall, ΣΔmodulators are oversampling converters and produces output pulses proportional to signal changes. • Quantization noise effects • Phase noise goes down as frequency increases [1, Perrott]
NOISE ANALYSIS: DITHERING [1, Perrott] • If you have an LTI system, the energy spectral density of the output is similar to an eigenvalue of the system. • Since we go from discrete time to continuous time, this relationship can be expressed as: H(s) y(t) x[n]
NOISE ANALYSIS: DITHERING [1, Perrott] • Recall:
Outline • Basic Topology of All Digital PLLs (ADPLL) • Where does the DCO fit in? • Early Architectures • Oscillator Background • Current Research • Seminal: All Digital Control [14] • Digitally controlled oscillator (DCO)-based architecture for RF frequency synthesis in a deep-submicrometer CMOS Process • Hysteresis Delay Cell [9] • A Sub-10-μW Digitally Controlled Oscillator Based on Hysteresis Delay Cell Topologies for WBAN Applications • Portability [2] • An Ultra-Low-Power and Portable Digitally Controlled Oscillator for SoC Applications • Frequency Acquisition and Locking [4] • A 1.7mW all digital phase-locked loop with new gain generator and low power DCO • SubthresholdOperation [10] • A 100μW, 1.9GHz oscillator with fully digital frequency tuning • Comparison of Results
DELAY CELLS: DCM • Many traditional delay lines are simple inverters • Chain of tri-state inverters in parallel • Driving capability modulation (DCM) • Changes the driving current of each delay cell by controlling number of enabled tri-state buffers/inverters • Bad power, linearity
DELAY CELLS: HYSTERESIS • Hysteresis delay cells (HDC) are relatively new in low power (2007 - ). Trade off power and delay resolution. • Fewer needed to acquire the delay of a many traditional delay cells. • HDCs have wider operating range • Control of driving current to obtain different propagation delay [2]
Implementation • Application: Wireless body area networks • Relaxes phase noise requirement • Oscillator structure based on a power-of-2 delay stage DCO (P2-DCO) architecture • Each delay stages is ½ delay of previous • 80um x 80um in 90nm CMOS • 5.4uW @ 3.4MHz, 1V supply • Presents two novel HDC topologies • Improves power-to-delay and area-to-delay ratios
Implementation: DELAY CELLS • Uses different hysteresis cells for different tuning stages • Need for decoder removed due to power of two delay • Header and footer rarely turned on at same time • Leads to voltage scaling of the cell with hysteresis [9] [9]
Outline • Basic Topology of All Digital PLLs (ADPLL) • Where does the DCO fit in? • Early Architectures • Oscillator Background • Current Research • Seminal: All Digital Control [14] • Digitally controlled oscillator (DCO)-based architecture for RF frequency synthesis in a deep-submicrometer CMOS Process • Hysteresis Delay Cell [9] • A Sub-10-μW Digitally Controlled Oscillator Based on Hysteresis Delay Cell Topologies for WBAN Applications • Portability [2] • An Ultra-Low-Power and Portable Digitally Controlled Oscillator for SoC Applications • Frequency Acquisition and Locking [4] • A 1.7mW all digital phase-locked loop with new gain generator and low power DCO • SubthresholdOperation [10] • A 100μW, 1.9GHz oscillator with fully digital frequency tuning • Comparison of Results
Architecture: STANDARD CELL • As technology migrates, push towards standard cell implementations for portability. • Goal: implement DCO in HDL • Ring oscillators always used for synthesizeable DCO • Limits implementation options • Most delay cells inverters and NANDs • Controllers simply digital logic
PAPER HIGHLIGHTS • Segmented delay line, hysteresis delay cells, and uses standard cells: ultra portable! • 140uW (@200 MHz) with 1.47-ps resolution • Segmented delay line power gating saves ~25-75% of power • Dependent on operating frequency [2]
Outline • Basic Topology of All Digital PLLs (ADPLL) • Where does the DCO fit in? • Early Architectures • Oscillator Background • Current Research • Seminal: All Digital Control [14] • Digitally controlled oscillator (DCO)-based architecture for RF frequency synthesis in a deep-submicrometer CMOS Process • Hysteresis Delay Cell [9] • A Sub-10-μW Digitally Controlled Oscillator Based on Hysteresis Delay Cell Topologies for WBAN Applications • Portability [2] • An Ultra-Low-Power and Portable Digitally Controlled Oscillator for SoC Applications • Frequency Acquisition and Locking [4] • A 1.7mW all digital phase-locked loop with new gain generator and low power DCO • Subthreshold Operation [10] • A 100μW, 1.9GHz oscillator with fully digital frequency tuning • Comparison of Results
CONTROLLER: LOCKING TIME • New DCO tuning word (OTW) presetting technique to reduce settling time • Three stages in ADPLL • PVT calibration • Frequency Acquisition • Tracking (locked) • Each mode is a search algorithm, each has its own scheme • For ring oscillator, controller implemented in digital logic • For LC oscillator, controller is capacitor bank
CONTROLLER: FASTER ALTERNATIVE • Paper [4] designed a new, faster locking algorithm for frequency acquisition. • Locks in 18 clock cycles • Binary search typically used [4]
CONTROLLER: FASTER ALTERNATIVE • PFD produces gain and fast/slow pulse • Mux selects fast/slow gain value • Gain value like the charge pump • As DCO frequency differs more from target, gain increases • Use previous gain with new gain to determine new guess value [4]
Outline • Basic Topology of All Digital PLLs (ADPLL) • Where does the DCO fit in? • Early Architectures • Oscillator Background • Current Research • Seminal: All Digital Control [14] • Digitally controlled oscillator (DCO)-based architecture for RF frequency synthesis in a deep-submicrometer CMOS Process • Hysteresis Delay Cell [9] • A Sub-10-μW Digitally Controlled Oscillator Based on Hysteresis Delay Cell Topologies for WBAN Applications • Portability [2] • An Ultra-Low-Power and Portable Digitally Controlled Oscillator for SoC Applications • Frequency Acquisition and Locking [4] • A 1.7mW all digital phase-locked loop with new gain generator and low power DCO • SubthresholdOperation [10] • A 100μW, 1.9GHz oscillator with fully digital frequency tuning • Comparison of Results
NOVELTY: SUBTHRESHOLD • 1.9 GHz DCO in 0.13um technology • 2 x 2mm2 using 6 metal layers • Supply voltage at 0.5V, 100uW power • More device transconductance(gm) is available for a given bias current • Application: frequency synthesizer in wireless transceiver • Between calibration, oscillator runs free until next tuning cycle (TX/RX) • Other circuitry turned off • No external components used (even with LC oscillator)
OSCILLATOR: LC Based • Differential NMOS only for high output swing for low input voltages • Inductance • Want high Q determines overall Q of system, startup current, and power consumption • Used bondwireinductances • Want 1fF LSB from caps, but a problem when wiring parasitics on same order of magnitude [10]
CHALLENGE: SMALL CAPACITORS • Capacitor matching a problem for small unit capacitors • Varactors could work • Need flat areas of curve • Testing required to find input voltages of such areas • Switched capacitor implementation using linear capacitors proposed • Routing parasitics reduced [10] Change in Cin by ΔC:
Outline • Basic Topology of All Digital PLLs (ADPLL) • Where does the DCO fit in? • Early Architectures • Oscillator Background • Current Research • Seminal: All Digital Control [14] • Digitally controlled oscillator (DCO)-based architecture for RF frequency synthesis in a deep-submicrometer CMOS Process • Hysteresis Delay Cell [9] • A Sub-10-μW Digitally Controlled Oscillator Based on Hysteresis Delay Cell Topologies for WBAN Applications • Portability [2] • An Ultra-Low-Power and Portable Digitally Controlled Oscillator for SoC Applications • Frequency Acquisition and Locking [4] • A 1.7mW all digital phase-locked loop with new gain generator and low power DCO • SubthresholdOperation [10] • A 100μW, 1.9GHz oscillator with fully digital frequency tuning • Comparison of Results
RESOURCES • CPPSIM Tutorials • [1, Perrot] PLL Digital Frequency Synthesizers • [2, Perrot] PLL Voltage Controlled Oscillators • All papers in the bibliography section of Wiki were used for plot generation • Papers [2], [4], [9], [10], [14] addressed in presentation • [3, Xu] Xu, L. (2006, May 18). Digitally controlled oscillator. Retrieved from http://www.ecdl.tkk.fi/education/4198/pdf/dco_lxu.pdf • [4, Thiel] Thiel, B.T.; Neyer, A.; Heinen, S.; , "Design of a low noise, low power 3.05–3.45 GHz digitally controlled oscillator in 90 nm CMOS," Research in Microelectronics and Electronics, 2009. PRIME 2009. Ph.D. , vol., no., pp.228-231, 12-17 July 2009.
Overview QUESTIONS? • Move to digital PLL implementations motivated by SoC applications • New digital circuits in ADPLL: TDC, filter, DCO • Ring oscillators versus LC oscillators • Current Research • Initial digital tuning with sigma-delta dithering • Delay cells • Portability • Frequency acquisition algorithm • Sub-threshold operation