160 likes | 1.03k Views
Configuration Management AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee. CMBG Mission.
E N D
Configuration Management AP-929, Revision 1Mike StoutChairmanCMBG Steering Committee Cleveland 2005
CMBG Mission “To provide a forum for the exchange of information which is useful to practitioners of nuclear facility configuration management and to act as the CM Community of Practice for the nuclear industry. Cleveland 2005
Community of Practice • A Community of Practice (CoP) is an industry peer group of experts in a process or sub-process defined in NEI’s Standard Nuclear Performance Model. The group serves as the owner of that particular process or sub-process, managing the solution of issues for the industry in that area. NEI assesses CoP development based on six attributes: formation of a leadership team, a charter, cost definitions, process descriptions, definitions of performance indicators and performance improvement projects. Cleveland 2005
Industry CM Issues • Margin Management • Fuel Performance • Performance Indicators • New NRC Engineering Inspections • IT cost/benefit • Process Orientation • Eastern European plants and risk Cleveland 2005
Current Initiatives • Planning for 2006 CMBG conference (June) in Richmond hosted by Dominion Energy. • Integrate CM/IM/IT Processes and resolve interface conflicts. • Complete revision to INPO AP-929 using CM Process model that agrees with NEI Standard Nuclear Performance Model • Pilot program to make CM performance indicators “workable and visible” Cleveland 2005
AP-929 Team • Gary Bal- INPO • Mike Stout- Spescom Software, Inc. • Keith Reinsmith- PPL Susquehanna • Rick Harris- Duke • John Parler- VC Summer • Bob Hess- Diablo Canyon • Larry Kidd- Dominion Energy • Tom Czerniewski- Indian Point Cleveland 2005
Project Motivation • CMBG 2001 Participants wanted focus on ANSI/NIRMA CM 1.0-2000 concepts and terminology • ANSI standard addresses “Objectives” and program elements • Worked with NEI on SNPM • Now working with INPO on AP-929 Cleveland 2005
CM Process Model • High level model • integrated processes used to return to CM ‘objective’ when change occurs. • developed in early 2002 by CMBG task force. • influenced content of industry guidance documents: • NEI Standard Nuclear Performance Model • INPO Operation Excellence Outcomes enablers • used by CMBG to develop CM Performance Indicators • AP-929 further details this model Cleveland 2005 11
CM Process Model ChangeDesignRequirements? ChangePhysicalConfiguration? ChangeFacilityConfigurationInformation? EvaluateIdentifiedProblem orDesiredChange * CM sub-processes agree with NEI Standard Nuclear Performance Model DoNothing More No No No CM Equilibrium Yes Yes Yes CM001* DesignRequirementsChange Process Physical ConfigurationChangeAuthorizationProcess Facility ConfigurationInformationChange Process CM002 * CM003 * CM004 * Cleveland 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD TABLE OF CONTENTS FEEDBACK AND COMMENTS PROCESS INTEGRATION DEFINITIONS CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROCESS FLOWCHART CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY DEFINITION APPENDICES Cleveland 2005
DEFINITIONS As-built As-designed As-found Authorization Basis Information Design Authority Design Bases Design Information Design Input Design Output Design Requirement Cleveland 2005
DEFINITIONS (continued) Facility Configuration Information Graded Approach Non-conformance Operational Configuration Operational Configuration Information Physical Configuration Structure, System, or Component Cleveland 2005
APPENDICES A Flowcharting Conventions B Design Basis C Well Managed Margins D Plant Modification Process Example E Performance Indicators F References Cleveland 2005
Team met at INPO in late August 2004 Model and outline completed Added a level of detail to model Mod example moved to Appendix Review by team complete. INPO review cycle, editorial changes. Will be on INPO website for comment Will notify all in CMBG database Expect issue by 3rd Qtr 2005. AP-929 revision status Cleveland 2005