110 likes | 268 Views
Potential role of PEP, PrEP and ART for HIV Prevention among Men who have Sex with Men . Frits van Griensven, PhD, MPH Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Thailand MOPH - US CDC Collaboration .
E N D
Potential role of PEP, PrEP and ART for HIV Prevention among Men who have Sex with Men Frits van Griensven, PhD, MPH Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Thailand MOPH - US CDC Collaboration Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC
In this presentation 1) Non-occupational (or sexual) post exposure prophylaxis (NPEP) 2) Pre-post exposure prophylaxis or PrEP Oral Topical 3) Antiretroviral treatment for prevention
Controls (n = 21) FTC/TFV daily (n=6) Efficacy of daily and pre- and post-exposure oral Truvada in preventing SHIV infection following rectal challenge in macaques 100 (HR>20, p<0.0001) FTC/TFV -2h/+22h (n=6) (HR>20, p<0.0001) 75 50 % Uninfected macaques 25 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Number of weekly rectal exposures Garcia-Lerma et al, PLOS, 2008
PrEP Initiative (iPrEx) • Men who have sex with men • Randomized 1:1 FTC/TDF vs Placebo • Daily oral • Followed for: • HIV seroconversion • Adverse Effects • Metabolic Effects • HBV exacerbations • Risk behavior and STIs (including HSV) • Adherence • If infected • Drug resistance • Viral load • Immunological responses and CD4 counts
Intermittent PrEP (iPrep) • May be more in line with sexual life style • Reduce pill burden • Reduce drug burden • Reduce side-effects • Decrease costs • May increase adherence and coverage • And may be increase safer sex behavior • And is supported by animal models
Challenges for ARV prevention in MSM • Adherance • Risk compensation and behavioral disinhibition, individually and at the community level • Targeting and duration of programs • Programming outside the Western world • Implementation and programming in low HIV prevalence communities • Costs and competition with curation • Pill burden, drug burden, side-effects, toxicity, resistance • How to monitor impact
In conclusion • PEP not ready for programmatic scale up, but good as an individual service on a case by case basis • Daily PrEP results expected soon; if efficacious, studies will try to identify non-inferior alternative regimens • Many implementation issues • Rectal PrEP – promising, but still long way to go • ART for prevention, seems reasonable, ecological evidence available, MSM transmission studies are urgently needed