1.05k likes | 2.18k Views
Business Skills. Decision Making & Problem solving Negotiation Planning Evaluating Performance Business strategy. Leadership Skills. Motivating talent Developing & communicating vision Goal setting Persuasion Persistence. How today’s competencies are taught.
E N D
Business Skills • Decision Making & Problem solving • Negotiation • Planning • Evaluating Performance • Business strategy Leadership Skills • Motivating talent • Developing & communicating vision • Goal setting • Persuasion • Persistence
Cognitive Factors Leading to Poor Decisions Using Relevant Information Sharing Information Noticing Information Bounded Awareness Poor decisions
Not SHARING Information limits awareness which leads to poor decisions Not Sharing information Bounded Awareness Poor Decisions
Consider Negotiation Exercise • The best outcome could be that both parties got all the fruit that was available and saved $$ on the bid
Students Reflect on “information sharing” in Negotiation Exercise • Describe what information you didn’t share AND explain how that led to a negative outcome • OR • Describe what information you shared AND explain how that led to a positive outcome
Not sharing information Bounded Awareness Poor Decision • What members do in groups • Discuss common information because it is agreed upon & rewarded with support • Do not discuss unique information they have • Do not seek out unique information that others may have
Not sharing information Bounded Awareness Poor Decision
Students plan on “information sharing” in Group Decision Making Exercise • How will you ensure that information is shared in the group decision making exercise? • common information • unique information • What steps have you already taken to ensure that information is shared in the group decision making exercise
Not using RELEVANT information limits awareness which affects the quality of decisions Not using relevant information Bounded Awareness Poor Decision Quality
Students Reflect on ‘using relevant information’ in Negotiation Exercise • What relevant information did you not use/share in the negotiation discussion AND explain how that led to a negative outcome • OR • What relevant information did you use in the negotiation discussion AND explain how that led to a positive outcome
Not using relevant information Bounded Awareness
Not using relevant information Bounded Awareness
Students plan on “using relevant information” in Group Decision Making Exercise • How will you ensure that RELEVANT information is used in the group decision making exercise? • What steps have you already taken to ensure that RELEVANT information is used in the group decision making exercise?
Not NOTICING information limits awareness which affects the quality of decisions Not Noticing information Bounded Awareness Poor Decision Quality
What affects whether you notice information? Focus on certain types of information Expectations about existing information Gradual changes in environment Amt of Information Noticed
Expectations about information Limits Information Noticed
Focus on certain types of information Limits Information Noticed Those who were told to watch superimposed videos of teams playing at different times AND who were asked to count the number of passes between members wearing the same jerseys did not notice woman walking with open umbrella on court
Limits Information Noticed Gradual changes in environment
Students plan on how you will notice the information that is out of your awareness during the Group Decision Making Exercise Give concrete examples of how you will notice information by changing your focus, changing your expectations, monitoring degree of changes in environment
Summary of Cognitive Factors that Can Inhibit your Decision Quality • Need to locate information that is out of your awareness to improve decision quality • Locate out of awareness information by • Perceiving it • changing focus, changing expectations, environment type • Using relevant bits • Sharing it with each other
Motivational biases to our judgments Bias in judgments Attachment
How evidence supports the link Attachment Plaintiffs (in an accident) predicted that they would receive larger awards from the judge than did defendants Bias in Judgment
How evidence supports the link Given a pay rate of $25 for 7 hrs, those who worked 10 hrs thought they should be paid $35 for 10 hrs of work (equal hourly pay) whereas those who worked 7 hrs thought the 10 hr workers should be paid $30 (equal total pay) Attachment Bias in Judgment
How evidence supports the link Attachment Sellers’ auditors were more biased than buyers’ auditors despite an incentive for accuracy Bias in Judgment
What’s next.. • Theoretical Understanding via lecture on Bazerman et al Readings • Cognitive & motivational factors • Practical Application of knowledge gained by doing the Conservation Crisis Case Exercise in a group • 20 min time limit • Complete “influence style” questionnaire individually after group decision exercise
Students reflect on COGNTIVE effects in Group Decision Making Exercise • How did your group fail/succeed in locating information out of awareness in terms of • Noticing it • focus, expectations, environmental changes • Using relevant bits • Sharing it
Students reflect on MOTIVATIONAL effects in Group Decision Making Exercise • How did attachment play a role in biasing group members’ judgments? OR • How might you prevent the effects of attachment on judgments in your group decision making exercise
For next week …. • Save your responses to the influence style responses for reflection and comparison with next week’s role play where you have to exercise influence again…