340 likes | 460 Views
Oklahoma Ag EXPO Top OSHA Issues for 2012 . November 3, 2011 Oklahoma City, OK Jess McCluer National Grain and Feed Association. About NGFA. More than 1,000 member companies representing: Grain elevators, Feed manufacturers, Oilseed processors, Flour mills, Biofuels producers, and
E N D
Oklahoma Ag EXPOTop OSHA Issues for 2012 November 3, 2011 Oklahoma City, OK Jess McCluer National Grain and Feed Association
About NGFA • More than 1,000 member companies representing: • Grain elevators, • Feed manufacturers, • Oilseed processors, • Flour mills, • Biofuels producers, and • Many other related businesses • Benefits of membership: • Contract arbitration and access to NGFA Trade Rules • Information services (bi-weekly Newsletter and E-Alert service) • Professional development and training • Representation in Washington, DC
National Grain and Feed Association • NGFA has been serving the industry for 115 years with the mission and purpose of: • Securing an abundant and safe food supply • Promoting free markets
Safety and Health • Occupational Safety and Health Administration • Sweep augers • Combustible dust • Fall protection • Increased inspections • Severe Violator Enforcement Program
OSHA Sweep AugerLetter of Interpretation On 12/24/09 OSHA issued a letter pertaining to sweep auger operations within grain bins: www.osha.gov (Interpretations) Prohibits an employee from working inside a bin while an unguarded sweep auger is in operation OSHA offered no acceptable procedures that would allow a person to work inside a bin when an unguarded auger is in operation
What Does the Letter Mean? • Until / unless modified, prevailing opinion and supersedes previous documents. • Each Region, Area Office and State Plan State can and has been interpreting the letter differently. • OSHA has used this letter to issue citations in 2010. • NGFA has met with OSHA in October and continues to work with OSHA to review the December 24th letter and it’s impact on grain handling and processing. • Anticipate written communication from OSHA regarding this situation early in 2012.
Sweep Auger Issue • Can OSHA do this? • Inconsistent with the language in the standard and in the rulemaking record • “Backdoor” rulemaking • No consideration for the practical implications • View of experts: “You are going to need a lot of shovels and workers with strong backs” • Economic impact could be substantial
Sweep Auger Issue (cont.) • NGFA and Senator Grassley (R-IA) also sent letters asking for clarification • Congresswoman Noem (R-SD) recently sent letter to OSHA encouraging agency to work with stakeholders to find practical solution • There is a case currently pending before federal OSHA challenging this policy
Sweep Auger Issue ( cont.) • A recent state plan decision addressed the issue of unguarded sweep augers • The Judge held that the Company “established that it is not possible to affix guards to the sweep auger’s point of operation without rendering the sweep auger ineffective” and also “established that its location guarding made it highly unlikely that an employee would touch the sweep auger’s point of operation”
Sweep Auger Issue (cont.) • Having employees in the bin during sweep auger violations does not violate the Grain Handling standard • With a “ground level opening” (standard two-ring door), employees are permitted to be inside the bin while sweep auger is running as long as there is no engulfment hazard • Because this is a state plan decision it has no impact on federal OSHA or in other state-plan states
What Can I Do? • Have effective safety and health program and procedures. • Review and analyze December 24th letter of interpretation and make changes to sweep auger operation process as you interpret. • Be prepared to explain to OSHA why you have or have not made changes to current policy. • Look for alternatives • “No entry” sweeps • Effective Lockout Tagout system • Cyclone vacuum systems • Air augers
OSHA’s Initiative on Combustible Dust • The 2008 sugar plant explosion in Georgia started this regulation. • OSHA began an “advanced notice of proposed rulemaking” process. • Risks to our industry of this rulemaking: • 1/8 inch standard could go lower (1/16 inch; 1/80 inch). • Other sectors besides elevators could have similar housekeeping standards. • Too much emphasis on dust may lead to too little attention on other risks e.g. ignition sources • How safe are we today? In 30 years: 2/3 reduction in explosions and 90% reduction in fatalities.
OSHA Combustible Dust Rulemaking • Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) issued on Oct. 21, 2009 outlined agency’s intent to develop a comprehensive combustible dust standard that would apply across different industry sectors: • ANPRM posed various 69 questions on which OSHA is soliciting public comment. • NGFA, AFIA and PFI submitted Joint Comments on Jan. 19, 2010. • Stakeholder meeting conducted on Dec. 14, Feb. 17 and April 21; NGFA testified at each one. • NGFA participated in June 28 Web-based forum. • NGFA is working with other organizations that also are affected: AFIA, NOPA, CRA, RFA, NAMA, others; goal is to convey a consistent message
OSHA Combustible Dust Rulemaking • Rulemaking issues specific to grain and feed industry: • Are revisions needed to the industry’s current grain handling standard? • Should current grain handling standard be “harmonized” with the potential approach created for other combustible dusts • Should grain and feed facilities be incorporated into a “new” standard, if developed
OSHA Combustible Dust Rulemaking • Housekeeping action level is a major consideration • OSHA is considering whether to incorporate National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards into combustible dust rule • NFPA standards refer to 1/64th inch of dust covering five percent of the total floor area of a building as a combustion hazard • NFPA formally proposed to combine into a single standard its current five separate combustible dust standards – NFPA 61, 484, 654, 655 and 664 • NFPA is creating Combustible Dust Technical Committee
What’s Next? OSHA recently convened Combustible Dust “Expert” Panel to Discuss Cost Impact Small Business Advocacy Review panel to review the draft proposed rule and related analyses prepared by OSHA. The panel will have 120 days to consider the proposal and provide recommendations.
OSHA Walking-Working Surfaces and PPE Standard • Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) issued on May 24 outlined agency’s intent to significantly revise current fall protection standard. Comments were due on August 23. • Specific issues related to grain and feed industry : • Seeks comments on whether specific regulations are needed to address rolling stock and commercial motor vehicles • Seeks comments on whether to include specific references to combustible dust in the housekeeping section of the standard
OSHA Walking-Working Surfaces and PPE Standard • Other issues in far reaching proposal include: • New requirements for guardrail, safety net and personal fall protection; • New requirements for portable and fixed ladders; • New requirements for employee training and retraining; and • Comments and cost-benefit analysis on proposal to require employees to provide waterproof foot gear where wet processes are used
Increased OSHA Enforcement • OSHA enforcement is at historic levels • Issuing bold interpretations • More inspections and significant cases • OSHA specifically interested in grain handling industry • Region VI Emphasis Program • Enhanced Administrative Penalties Memorandum • Severe Violator Enforcement Program
SVEP: What Is It? Enforcement policies to focus resources on employers “who have demonstrated indifference to their OSH Act obligations by committing willful, repeated, or failure-to-abate violations” Replaces Enhanced Enforcement Program States required to adopt the program or adopt an equivalent program.
SVEP: What Happens If I Am In It? • Enhanced Follow-up Inspections • Nationwide Inspections of Related Workplaces/Worksites • Increased Company Awareness of OSHA Enforcement • Sending Citation and Notification of Penalty to Headquarters • Issuing News Releases • Posting on OSHA’s Webpage? • Sending Letters to Corporate Officers • Enhanced Settlement Provisions • Section 11(b) Enforcement
Citation and Enforcement:SVEP Program—Unanswered Questions Unanswered Questions and Implications It is not clear how an employer will be removed from the program. Will an employer be released from the SVEP if OSHA conducts a follow-up inspection of the originally cited worksite and does not find any similar level of violations? Or is there something more an employer would need to do, such as comply with some or all of the enhanced settlement provisions described above? It is not clear whether OSHA will face challenges from employers for probable cause if the agency attempts to conduct inspections of other worksites based upon a citation satisfying one of the criteria set forth in the directive, even though the citation is not yet a final order of the OSHRC.
August 4th 2010 and February 1st 2011 Letters “OSHA has investigated several cases involving worker entry into grain storage bins where we have found that the employer was aware of the hazards and of OSHA’s standards, but failed to train or protect the workers entering the bin,” wrote OSHA Administrator David Michaels.
2010 Totals 70% on farm 30% commercial Source: Purdue University Agricultural Safety and Health Program
Letter to Industry on Grain Bin-Entry Procedures (cont.) In the letter, OSHA reminded employees of the grain handling standard’s regulations and governing bin entry procedures. OSHA has Grain Bin Entry Fact Sheet and recently developed Hazard Alert – Dangers of Engulfment and Suffocation in Grain Bins for employers and workers.
US Department of Labor Proposed Child Labor Rules • On September 2, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) proposed substantial revisions to the department’s child labor regulations to ban youth under certain ages from engaging in specific types of work at off-farm agricultural business, as well as on farms not owned or operated by their parents. Some of the proposed changes include: • Prohibit youth less than 18 from working at grain elevators, grain bins, silos, feedlots, stockyards, livestock exchanges and livestock auctions. • Farm workers less than age 16 also generally would be banned from operating almost all power-driven equipment, as well as from participating in the cultivation, harvesting and curing of tobacco. • “Clarifying” the family farm exemption by assuring that children of individuals who operate, as well as those who own, farms are eligible to work.
Education and Training • Training • Safety, Health and Environmental and Grain Quality Conference, August 1-2, 2012 • Education • “Grain Bin Safety: Protection You and Your Family” • NGFA and NCGA safety training DVD • “Your Safety Matters” • NGFA and GEAPS safety training DVD • “Don’t Go With the Flow • NGFA and Purdue University entrapment rescue training video
Education and Training (cont.) http://www.grainentrapmentprevention.com/
Oklahoma Ag EXPO Top OSHA Issues for 2012 Thank you!! Jess McCluer National Grain and Feed Association 202-289-0873 jmccluer@ngfa.org