1 / 13

Integrationism in Linguistics & Communication: A Theoretical Overview

Explore the theory of integrationism in linguistics and communication, emphasizing the role of time in human interaction. Learn about the integration of biomechanical processes and macrosocial frameworks in communication. Discover how tagging practices can facilitate integration on individual and community levels. Dive into research by Roy Harris and other scholars to understand the significance of integration in human communication. This concise overview will provide valuable insights for students and researchers in the field of language and communication studies.

ebergman
Download Presentation

Integrationism in Linguistics & Communication: A Theoretical Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Integrating tagging: tagging as integration Mark R. Lindner Visiting Serials Cataloger

  2. Outline • Quick overview of Integrationism • “Community” as macrosocial • Towards integration • Tagging as integration

  3. Integrationism • theory of linguistics and communication • opposed to segregational accounts • Roy Harris, Professor Emeritus, Oxford

  4. Time • is the key factor in human communication • Our senses are integrated across, through and in time.

  5. Constraints on human communication • Biomechanical • Macrosocial • Circumstantial

  6. The Sign “A sign is integrational in the sense that it typically involves the contextualized application of biomechanical skills within a certain macrosocial framework, thereby contributing to the integration of activities which would otherwise remain unintegrated.” Harris, R. (1995) Signs of writing, pp. 22-23

  7. “Community” is the macrosocial • Proficiency • Practice • Conformity

  8. Towards integration • Tennis (2006) • Sen, et. al. (2006) • Kipp (2007) • Campbell (2007) • Kipp (2008)

  9. Tagging as integration • Individual tagging • Community tagging

  10. Sources • Campbell, D. G. (2007). The long tail of forgetting: Libraries, the Web 2.0, and the phenomenology of memory. In C. Arsenault & K. Dalkir (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science (p. 12). McGill University, Montreal, Quebec. Retrieved May 4, 2008, from http://www.cais-acsi.ca/proceedings/2007/campbell_2007.pdf. • Harris, R. (1995). Signs of Writing. London: Routledge. • Harris, R. (1996a). Signs, Language, and Communication: Integrational and Segregational Approaches. London: Routledge. • Harris, R. (2005). Integrationism. Roy Harris Online. http://www.royharrisonline.com/integrationism.html Viewed 26 Oct 2008.

  11. Sources • IAISLC, What is Integrationism? The International Association for the Integrational Study of Language and Communication (IAISLC) http://www.integrationists.com/integrationism.html Viewed 26 Oct 2008. • Kipp, M. E. I. (2007). Tagging practices on research oriented social bookmarking sites. In C. Arsenault & K. Dalkir (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science (p. 13). Mcgill University, Montreal, Quebec. Retrieved May 4, 2008, from http://www.cais-acsi.ca/proceedings/2007/kipp_2007.pdf. • Kipp, M. E. I. (2008b). @toread and Cool : Subjective, Affective and Associative Factors in Tagging. In Proceedings Canadian Association for Information Science/L'Association canadienne des sciences de l'information (CAIS/ACSI) (p. 7). Vancouver, British Columbia: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved September 7, 2008, from http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00013788/.

  12. Sources • Sen, S., Lam, S. K., Rashid, A. M., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Osterhouse, J., et al. (2006). tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 181-190). Banff, Alberta, Canada: ACM. Retrieved October 24, 2008, from http://portal.acm.org.proxy2.library.uiuc.edu/citation.cfm?id=1180875.1180904&coll=portal&dl=ACM&CFID=5764831&CFTOKEN=12441359. • Tennis, J. T. (2006). Comparative Functional Analysis of Boundary Infrastructures, Library Classification, and Social Tagging. In H. Moukdad (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science (p. 10). York University, Toronto, Ontario. Retrieved May 4, 2008, from http://www.cais-acsi.ca/proceedings/2006/tennis_2006.pdf.

  13. Thank you! Mark R. Lindner Visiting Serials Cataloger and Visiting Assistant Professor of Library Administration University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) Certificate of Advanced Study candidate, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, UIUC mlindner@illinois.edu 217-244-1889

More Related