1 / 33

Phase 1a Prototype as model for injector L0 layout + experimental plan + results to date

Phase 1a Prototype as model for injector L0 layout + experimental plan + results to date. Ivan Bazarov. X-ray characteristics needed. For a properly tuned undulator: x-ray phase space is a replica from electron bunch + convolution with the diffraction limit

ecalderon
Download Presentation

Phase 1a Prototype as model for injector L0 layout + experimental plan + results to date

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Phase 1a Prototype as model for injectorL0 layout + experimental plan + results to date Ivan Bazarov

  2. X-ray characteristics needed • For a properly tuned undulator: x-ray phase space is a replica from electron bunch + convolution with the diffraction limit • ideally, one wants the phase space to be diffraction limited (i.e. full transverse coherence), e.g. ,rms = l/4p, or 0.1 Å for 8 keV x-rays (Cu Ka), or n,rms = 0.1 mm normalized at 5 GeV Flux ph/s/0.1%bw Brightness ph/s/mrad2/0.1%bw Brillianceph/s/mm2/mrad2/0.1%bw I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  3. Injector prototype beam goals • Demonstrate efficacy of achieving thermal emittance at the end of the injector at a bunch charge of 77 pC/bunch or some large fraction thereof • Understand the limitations in the injector (both physics and technology) to allow for improved design in the future I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  4. Experimental plan: areas • Photocathode phenomena • Space charge dominated regime • Longitudinal phase space control • Emittance preservation in the merger • High average current phenomena • Achieving ultimate ‘tuned-up’ performance I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  5. R128 vs. L0 R128 • Simple: gun & diagnostics line • Full phase space characterization capability after the gun • Temporal measurements with the deflecting cavity L0 • Limited diagnostics after the gun (before the module) • Full interceptive diagnostics capabilities at 5-15 MeV • Some full beam power diagnostics I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  6. L0 layout: near the gun I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  7. L0 layout: 15 MeV straight-thru I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  8. L0 layout: merger & chicane merger diagnostics chicane I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  9. Diagnostics overview • Beam position resolution: 10 mm (spec) • Energy spread resolution: 10–4 • Transverse beam profile resolution: 30 mm (viewscreens) 10 mm (slits) 30 mm (flying wire) • Angular spread resolution: 10 mrad • Pulse length (deflecting cavity&slits): 100 fs • RF phase angle: 0.5 Ability to take phase space snapshots of the beam, both transverse planes, and longitudinal phase space I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  10. Emittance measurement system • no moving parts; fast DAQ • 10 mm precision slits • armor slit intercepts most of the beam • kW beam power handling measured phase space I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  11. Deflecting cavity • 100 fs time resolution (with slits) • Used in: • photoemission response meas. • slice transverse emittance meas. • longitudinal phase space mapping I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  12. Flying wire • 20 m/s flying carbon wire (can go faster) • Applicable with 0.6 MW of beam power • Two units, one in dispersive section to allow studies of long-range wake fields I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  13. THz radiation • One of chicane dipole magnets to be used in the analysis of FIR radiation spectrum • Applicable with 0.6 MW of beam power • Provides the autocorrelation of the bunch profile • OTR foils for low beam power measurements coherently enhanced spectrum I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  14. Beam experiments I. Photocathode phenomena • Exp1. Thermal emittance (R128)done • Exp2. Photoemission response time (R128) 2 weeks II. Space charge regime • Exp3. Space charge limited extraction from the cathode (R128) 1 week • Exp4. Effect of laser pulse shaping on emittance compensation (R128) 2 weeks • Exp5. Phase space tomography of bunched beam (R128 & L0) 2 weeks R128 + 2 weeks L0 • Exp6. Benchmarking of space charge codes (R128 & L0) 1 week R128 • Exp7. Slice emittance studies (L0) 2 weeks I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  15. Beam experiments III. Longitudinal phase space control • Exp8. Ballistic bunch compression (L0) 2 weeks • Exp9. Longitudinal phase space mapping (L0) 2 weeks IV. Emittance preservation in the merger • Exp10. Space charge induced emittance growth in dispersive sections (L0) 2 weeks • Exp11. CSR effect (L0) 2 weeks I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  16. Beam experiments V. High average current phenomena • Exp12. Ion effect (R128 & L0) 1 week R128 + 2 weeks L0 • Exp13. Long range wakefield effects (L0) 1 week VI. Achieving ultimate ‘tuned-up’ performance • Exp14. Orbit stability characterization and feedback (L0) 2 weeks • Exp15. Exploration of ‘multi-knobs’ and online optimization (L0) 3 weeks I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  17. Time need estimates R128 L0 beam running time (everything is working the first try) 9 weeks 20 weeks 2 (reality factor) 19 weeks40 weeks I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  18. Physics limit of e-photoguns Two main limiting mechanisms: • Phase space scrambling due to nonlinear space charge • Photocathode thermal emittance 3D Gaussian initial distribution Optimal initial distribution en,x = 1.7 mm en,x = 0.13 mm • Vgun = 750 kV • kT = 35 meV • Optimum 3D shape Theoretical emittance min: I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  19. Exp1. Thermal emittance GaAs GaAsP • kT = 1218 meV at 520 nm • or 0.49 mm-mrad per 1 mm rms • GaAs still best overall perform. I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  20. 50 % 18 % Exp2. Cathode time response measured temporal response • Measured response time from GaAs and GaAsP at different wavelengths • GaAs response @ 520 nm on the order of a picosecond • Diffusion model correctly describes fast response and a slow tail GaAs response to a 100 fs pulse expected temporal profile diffusion model: fit to data 50% emission point 800 nm: 15 ps 520 nm: 0.83 ps • Deflecting cavity measurement of temporal profile next month I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  21. spatial temporal Exp4. Laser shaping effect • Effective means of laser shaping have been devised and tested • Beer-can distribution is the goal for Phase1a (a better shapes exist) laser shape: where we are today gaussian planning to be in few weeks from now flat-top I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  22. First space charge running SOL1 = SOL2 = 4.5 A SOL1 = SOL2 = 3A E-beam right after the gun (250 kV) and the solenoid measured simulated cathode well-defined halo uniform gaussian viewscreen SOL1 EMS VC1 longitudinal tail overfocused particles folding-over forms well-defined boundary I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  23. 70 pC/bunch 1 2 3 4 5 log scale 1 5 smallest emittance eny = 1.8 0.1 mm-mrad 2 3 4 I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  24. Agreement with simulations Good agreement with Astra prediction: 77 pC/bunch: about 2 mm-mrad data astra I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  25. Exp6. Codes’ benchmarking R128: gun & solenoid  L0: 11 MeV • Emittance right after the gun is within 50% of the final value • Establish the validity of space charge codes & high degree of emittance compensation in R128 I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  26. Exp9. Long. phase space map. Ce:YAG at the end of C2 • Combination of slits & deflecting cavity to allow detailed longitudinal phase space mapping • Temporal resolution 0.1 ps, energy resolution 10–4 • Will be used in a variety of studies, e.g. • ensuring small energy spread, a prerequisite for successful transport through the merger • optimizing compression scheme Time Energy I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  27. Exp11. CSR in the merger Dex,n,CSR 0.25 mm elegant • EMS systems placed before and after the merger to isolate the CSR emittance growth • Phase space dilution studies as a function of varying charge and bunch length • Longer term possibilities – smaller bends, shielded chamber I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  28. Exp12. Ions • Initial calculations show that running 100 mA CW will cause problems with safe beam dump operation • Full beam neutralization over 4 s at 10–9 Torr • Possible approaches: • develop the average-current dependant optics to account for the full beam neutralization and slowly ramp up the current (test in R128) • introduce the ion gap, e.g. 6 ms every 60 ms (test in R128) • the ion gap will cause large RF transients, it won’t work in L0 • Energy stored in the gun: 15.6 J 1% transient over 1.5 ms • Energy stored in a cavity: 0.5-5 J 1% transient over 0.1 ms • introduce clearing electrodes (non-trivial changes to the beamline, would rather avoid) I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  29. DC beam in R128 (250 kV) gun through the dump zoomed in Full neutralization assumed Nominal size at the dump 4s = 20 cm • Ions ‘helping’ to have a small beam • 250 kV 25 kW over 4 cm diameter is probably safe on the dump • 0.6 MW will not be so forgiving! I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  30. L0 dump • Two extremely short focal-length quads near the dump blow up the beam by a factor of more than a hundred • Even with the raster, the spot size cannot be less than 8 cm rms at the dump plane. Ions will throw a monkey wrench into the optical setting. • The optics will have to incorporate the ions to avoid the dump failure mechanism • Challenge: we are essentially blind at 0.6 MW near the dump as far as the beam profile is concerned. I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  31. Exp15. Multi-knobs & tune-up • Virtual injector allows absolute control of parameters, real system with a dozen of sensitive parameters will not 100 random seeds (outliers removed) Pulse duration rms 21.5  1.4 ps Spot size rms 0.640  0.057 mm Charge 80  5.8 pC Solenoid1 Bmax 0.491  0.010 kG Solenoid2 Bmax 0.532  0.010 kG Cavity1 phase -41.6  1.7 deg Cavity2 phase -31.9  2.0 deg Cavity3-5 phase -25.7  2.0 deg Buncher Emax 1.73  0.04 MV/m Cavity1 Emax 15.4  0.3 MV/m Cavity2 Emax 26.0  0.5 MV/m Cavity3-5 Emax 27.0  0.5 MV/m Q1_grad -0.124  0.002 T/m Q2_grad 0.184  0.002 T/m Q3_grad 0.023  0.002 T/m Q4_grad -0.100  0.002 T/m ave(y) = 0.95 mm ave(x) = 1.04 mm std(x) = 0.52 mm std(y) = 0.62 mm I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  32. Possible strategies • Should develop ad-hoc means to tune-up the nonlinear system for optimal performance • ‘Manual’ optimization using a calculated Hessian matrix of the beam emittance from the space charge codes: • Use SVD of the Hessian to form ‘multi-knobs’ that correspond to top few eigenvalues • Other potentials: use online direct search method (e.g. simplex) or a stochastic search (e.g. genetic algorithms). Analog computer evaluations will be limited to a few hundred at most. I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

  33. Summary • Experimental plan outlined, both R128 and L0 parts are essential • Move to L0 once en 0.5 mm-mrad demonstrated at the nominal bunch charge (77 pC) from the gun; premature move is advised-against • There are things we know we don’t know (e.g. ions), and there are things we don’t know we don’t know. We are concentrating on the former. I.V. Bazarov, ERL review 03/09/07

More Related