1 / 25

Development of STRATEGIC PLAN through 2015

Development of STRATEGIC PLAN through 2015. DEVELOPMENT STEPS. Strategic Plan Model Used. Adapted from Peter Drucker’s model:. Development Timeline. Process took almost a year. Stakeholders involved in Development. More than 550 individuals participated Stakeholder groups included:

edaline
Download Presentation

Development of STRATEGIC PLAN through 2015

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Development of STRATEGIC PLAN through 2015

  2. DEVELOPMENT STEPS

  3. Strategic Plan Model Used Adapted from Peter Drucker’s model:

  4. Development Timeline Process took almost a year

  5. Stakeholders involved in Development • More than 550 individuals participated • Stakeholder groups included: • Students • Employees • Board of Regents • Community Representatives

  6. Development Process 1. Customized surveys and focus group meetings for stakeholder groups: • Students – more than 230 • Employees – more than 140 • Community Representatives including Board of Regents – more than 60 2. Survey and focus group responses grouped by strategic plan component

  7. Development Process 3. President’s Cabinet drafted environmental scan of internal and external factors 4. President’s Cabinet drafted values, vision, core purpose, mission and goals based on results of surveys and focus groups and environmental scan

  8. Development Process 5. Vetted these components of strategic plan throughout the College 6. President’s Cabinet appointed a Strategic Plan Writing Team

  9. Development Process 7. Strategic Plan Writing Team recommended strategies and tasks be recommended by the front line managers and senior administration 8. Front line managers and senior administration identified Constraints and Concerns and Issues

  10. Development Process 9. Front line managers and senior administration recommended Strategies and Tasks based on the Constraints and Concerns and Issues 10. President’s Cabinet finalized and approved the entire Strategic Plan including the Strategies and Tasks

  11. Strategic Plan through 2015 submitted for Approval

  12. What is proposed? VALUES At Amarillo College, we value: • Student Success • Quality Education • Opportunity for All • Collaboration • Community Responsiveness • Responsible Stewardship VISION • At Amarillo College, we aspire for every student to have a success story. CORE PURPOSE • At Amarillo College, we help each student to succeed.

  13. What is proposed? MISSION Amarillo College – enriching the lives of our students and our community.

  14. What is proposed? GOALS • Ensure Student Success • Expand Student Access • Collaborate with Partners in the Community • Ensure the College’s Future

  15. MISSION

  16. MISSION STATEMENT + FULL CONTEXT MISSION: Amarillo College – enriching the lives of our students and our community. FULL Context for Mission includes: VALUES: At Amarillo College, we value: • Student Success • Quality Education • Opportunity for All • Collaboration • Community Responsiveness • Responsible Stewardship VISION: At Amarillo College, we aspire for every student to have a success story. CORE PURPOSE: At Amarillo College, we help each student to succeed. GOALS: • Ensure Student Success • Expand Student Access • Collaborate with Partners in the Community • Ensure the College’s Future

  17. Why must the mission be vetted? SACSCOC Core Requirement 2.4: The institution has a clearly defined, comprehensive, and publishedmission statement that is specific to the institution and appropriate for higher education. The mission addresses teaching and learning and, where applicable, research and public service. (Institutional Mission) SACSCOC Comprehensive Standard 3.1: The mission statement is current and comprehensive, accurately guides the institution’s operations, is periodically reviewed and updated, is approved the governing board, and is communicated to the institution’s constituencies. (Institutional Mission)

  18. Why must the mission be vetted? Ensuring Fulfillment of AC Board Policy: 1. A broad representation of the College stakeholders should have input regarding the mission to be sure that it represents AC. Ensuring Fulfillment of SACSCOC Requirements: 2. Mission must include EVERYTHING (e.g. instruction and public service) that AC is doing to serve all of its stakeholders (i.e. students, community, employees, Board of Regents, etc.)

  19. Why must the mission be vetted? Ensuring Fulfillment of SACSCOC Requirements: 3. Must select effectiveness indicators for the mission. Once the mission is used, results from these effectiveness indicators must be produced regularly, used systematically in making decisions, and reported publicly. (NOTE: Each goal has target measurements.) 4. When considering the revised AC mission, must be sure that AC reflects within the mission or elsewhere as instructed by the Board of Regents, how the current economic downturn and budget limitations will be reflected within AC’s mission.

  20. Who vetted the mission? Existing Groups of Stakeholders: • Students • Credit – Student Government Association (4/21/10) • Employees • Administrators Association (Requested – no response) • Classified Employees Council (4/22/10) • Faculty Senate (4/9/10) • Listening & Learning – all employees invited (West Campus 3/22/10 & Washington Street campus 3/23/10) • ITS Division (4/7/10) • Assessment & Development Division (4/8/10)

  21. Who vetted the mission? Existing Groups of Stakeholders: • Employees (continued) • Administrators Association (Requested – no response) • Classified Employees Council (4/22/10) • Faculty Senate (4/9/10) • Instructional Assessment Subcommittee (3/26/10) • Non-Instructional Assessment Subcommittee (3/23/10) • Listening & Learning – all employees invited (West Campus 3/22/10 & Washington Street campus 3/23/10) • ITS Division (4/7/10) • Assessment & Development Division (4/8/10) • Continuing Education Division (4/19/10) • Enrollment Mgmt. Division (4/26/10) • VP Council (4/28/10)

  22. Who vetted the mission? Existing Groups of Stakeholders: • President’s Cabinet • Reviewed “word-smithing” responses regarding proposed mission • Decided to recommend the proposed mission to Board of Regents • Decided to recommend an annual review of the mission at each June Board of Regents meeting

  23. Who approves the mission and Strategic Plan through 2010? • Board of Regents • Scheduled to approve/revise proposed mission at August 13, 2010 BOR meeting

  24. ANNUAL REVIEW OF MISSION PROPOSE AN ANNUAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE MISSION AT: Each June Board of Regents Meeting

  25. QUESTIONS

More Related