290 likes | 389 Views
Results. Preventive therapy in type 2 diabetes: Unresolved issues in 2000. Does standard treatment with fixed combination perindopril/indapamide on top of regular BP control: Produce additional benefits when systolic pressure is lowered below 145 mmHg ?
E N D
Preventive therapy in type 2 diabetes: Unresolved issues in 2000 • Does standard treatment with fixed combination perindopril/indapamide on top of regular BP control: • Produce additional benefits when systolic pressure is lowered below 145 mmHg? • Produce similar benefits for hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients? • Add to the benefits produced by other cardiovascular preventive therapies including ACE inhibitors ?
Follow-up and adherence
ADVANCETrial profile 12877 with type 2 diabetes registered 1737 withdrew during run-in 11140 randomised 5569 assigned perindopril-indapamide combination 5571 assigned matching placebo 4 lost to follow-up 11 lost to follow-up Scheduled end of follow-up: 4.3 years 4908 (88%) assessed at final visit 4081 (73%) adherent to treatment Scheduled end of follow-up: 4.3 years 4863 (87%) assessed at final visit 4143 (74%) adherent to treatment
Mortality and morbidity
Placebo Perindopril-Indapamide All-cause mortality 10 5 Cumulative incidence (%) Relative risk reduction 14%: 95% CI 2-25% p=0.025 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 Follow-up (months)
Deaths Cardiovascular Non-cardiovascular 5% 5% Placebo Placebo Perindopril-indapamide Perindopril-indapamide Cumulative incidence (%) Relative risk reduction 18%; p=0.027 Relative risk reduction 8%; p=0.41 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 Follow-up (months) Follow-up (months)
Combined primary outcomesMajor macro or microvascular event 20 Placebo Perindopril-Indapamide Cumulative incidence (%) 10 Relative risk reduction 9%: 95% CI: 0 to 17% p=0.041 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 Follow-up (months)
Primary outcomesMajor macro or microvascular event Number of events Per-Ind Placebo Favours Relative risk Favours (n=5,569) (n=5,571) Per-Ind Placebo reduction (95% CI) * Combined macro+micro 861 938 9% (0 to 17) Macrovascular 480 520 8% (-4 to 19) Microvascular 439 477 9% (-4 to 20) 0.5 1.0 2.0 Hazard ratio *2P=0.04
Coronary events Number of events Per-Ind Placebo Favours Favours Relative risk (n=5,569) (n=5,571) Per-Ind Placebo reduction (95% CI) * All coronary heart disease 468 535 14% (2 to 24) Major coronary heart disease† 265 294 11% (-6 to 24) Other coronary heart disease‡ 283 324 14% (-1 to 27) 0.5 1.0 2.0 Hazard ratio *2P=0.02 †Non-fatal MI or death from coronary heart disease ‡Unstable angina requiring hospitalisation, coronary revascularisation or silent MI
Cerebrovascular events Number of events Per-Ind Placebo Favours Favours Relative risk (n=5,569) (n=5,571) Per-Ind Placebo reduction (95% CI) * All cerebrovascular disease 286 303 6% (-10 to 20) Major cerebrovascular disease† 215 218 2% (-18 to 19) Other cerebrovascular disease‡ 79 99 21% (-6 to 41) 2.0 0.5 1.0 Hazard ratio *2P=0.40 †Non-fatal stroke or death from cerebrovascular disease ‡Transient ischaemic attack or subarachnoid haemorrhage
Renal events Number of events Per-Ind Placebo Favours Favours Relative risk (n=5,569) (n=5,571) Per-Ind Placebo reduction (95% CI) Total renal events 1243 1500 21% (15 to 27)* 18% (-1 to 32) New or worsening nephropathy 181 216 New microalbuminuria 1094 1317 21% (14 to 27) 2.0 0.5 1.0 Hazard ratio *2P=<0.01
Eye events Number of events Per-Ind Placebo Favours Favours Relative risk (n=5,569) (n=5,571) Per-Ind Placebo reduction (95% CI) Total eye events 2531 2611 5% (-1 to 10)* 289 286 New or worsening eye disease -1% (-18 to 15) 2446 2514 5% (-1 to 10) Visual deterioration 2.0 0.5 1.0 Hazard ratio *2P=0.09
Absolute benefits of routine treatment with perindopril and indapamide • *mostly new onset microalbuminuria
Subgroups Combined primary outcome
Effects by age, sex, BP and HbA1cCombined primary endpoint Number of events Per-Ind Placebo Favours Favours Relative risk (n=5,569) (n=5,571) Per-Ind Placebo reduction (95% CI) Age (years) < 65 325 346 6% (-10 to 19) ≥ 65 536 592 11% (0 to 21) Sex Male 546 594 10% (-1 to 20) Female 315 344 8% (-7 to 21) SBP (mmHg) < 140 309 341 10% (-5 to 23) ≥ 140 552 597 9% (-2 to 19) History of hypertension No 121 136 9% (-17 to 29) Yes 740 802 9% (0 to 18) HbA1c (%) ≤ 7.5 406 456 9% (-4 to 20) > 7.5 451 481 11% (-1 to 22) All participants 9% (0 to 17) 861 938 2.0 0.5 1.0 Phomogeneity all >0.1 Hazard ratio
Effects by ancillary treatmentCombined primary endpoint Number of events Per-Ind Placebo Favours Favours Relative risk (n=5,569) (n=5,571) Per-Ind Placebo reduction (95% CI) Treatment with any BP lowering drug 177 183 6% (-15 to 24) No 684 755 10% (0 to 19) Yes Treatment with ACE inhibitor No 417 455 10% (-3 to 21) 444 483 8% (-4 to 20) Yes Treatment with statins No 638 687 10% (0 to 19) 223 251 8% (-10 to 23) Yes Treatment with anti-platelet drug No 408 454 11% (-2 to 22) Yes 453 484 7% (-5 to 18) All participants 9% (0 to 17) 861 938 Phomogeneity all >0.1 2.0 0.5 1.0 Hazard ratio
Subgroups New onset microalbuminuria
Effects by age, sex, BP and HbA1cMicroalbuminuria Number of events Per-Ind Placebo Favours Favours Relative risk (n=5,569) (n=5,571) Per-Ind Placebo reduction (95% CI) Age (years) < 65 448 522 16% (5 to 26) ≥ 65 646 795 24% (15 to 31) Sex Male 601 724 21% (12 to 29) Female 493 593 20% (9 to 29) SBP (mmHg) < 140 465 535 16% (4 to 25) ≥ 140 629 782 24% (16 to 32) History of hypertension No 178 218 19% (1 to 34) Yes 916 1099 21% (14 to 28) HbA1c (%) ≤ 7.5 640 795 20% (11 to 28) > 7.5 444 517 22% (11 to 31) All participants 1094 1317 21% (14 to 27) Phomogeneity all >0.1 2.0 0.5 1.0 Hazard ratio
Effects by ancillary treatmentMicroalbuminuria Number of events Per-Ind Placebo Favours Favours Relative risk (n=5,569) (n=5,571) Per-Ind Placebo reduction (95% CI) Treatment with any BP lowering drug No 264 312 21% (7 to 33) 830 1005 20% (13 to 27) Yes Treatment with open-label perindopril No 588 671 16% (6 to 25) 506 646 25% (16 to 33) Yes Treatment with statins No 816 987 23% (15 to 30) Yes 278 330 15% (1 to 28) Treatment with anti-platelet drug 568 697 22% (13 to 30) No Yes 526 620 19% (9 to 28) All participants 1094 1317 21% (14 to 27) 2.0 0.5 1.0 Phomogeneity all >0.1 Hazard ratio
Summary • Routine treatment of type 2 diabetic patients with perindopril-indapamide resulted in: • 14% reduction in total mortality • 18% reduction in cardiovascular death • 9% reduction in major vascular events • 14% reduction in total coronary events • 21% reduction in total renal events Similar benefits in all major subgroups. Benefits additional to those produced by other treatments, including ACE inhibitor. Treatment very well tolerated.
Preventive therapy in type 2 diabetes: Unresolved issues in 2000 • Does standard treatment with fixed combination perindopril/indapamide on top of regular BP control: • Produce additional benefits when systolic pressure is lowered below 145 mmHg? YES • Produce similar benefits for hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients? YES • Add to the benefits produced by other cardiovascular preventive therapies including ACE inhibitors ? YES
Need for type 2 DM patients Summary In ADVANCEFixed combination perindopril/indapamide • Reduction of CV events • on top of current preventive treatments • Simple, safe and well tolerated treatment • Reduces • Mortality • CV events • renal failure • on top of current preventive treatments • irrespective of usage of • BP lowering agents including ACEi • statines Simple, safe and well tolerated treatment
Summary • Aim for guideline based BP goal • + • standard additition of fixed per/ind combination (like statines post MI) Is a more effective strategy than Aim for guideline based BP goal
Discussie Wat betekent ADVANCE voor de dagelijkse diabeteszorg?