1 / 17

Mechanical System Design & the StarLight Project

Mechanical System Design & the StarLight Project. Andy Jarski Mechanical Systems Engineer Ball Aerospace & Technologies. Overview. Brief Intro to Mechanical Design process StarLight as an example Some designs I’m working on Conclusions. Quick Look at the Design Process.

edana
Download Presentation

Mechanical System Design & the StarLight Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mechanical System Design & the StarLight Project Andy Jarski Mechanical Systems Engineer Ball Aerospace & Technologies

  2. Overview • Brief Intro to Mechanical Design process • StarLight as an example • Some designs I’m working on • Conclusions

  3. Quick Look at the Design Process • Identify the requirements • Mission • Launch Environments • Instrument / Payload Accommodations • Create Preliminary Configurations • Subsystem requirements (size, location, FOV) • Accessibility • Producibility • Structural Characteristics (load paths, stiffness) • Design Options • Materials (strength, stiffness, weight, CTE, corrosion resistance, cost, etc.) • General shape / layout • Validation of Requirements • Test Criteria • Design Criteria • Iterations • Until requirements are met • Detailed design goes to production

  4. StarLight is the 1st of it’s Kind • Demonstrate 2 key technologies of particular importance for Terrestrial Planet Finder: • Autonomous Formation Flying • Separated-Spacecraft Interferometry • Mission uses 2 spacecraft, launched together which then separate to 600-1000m to simulate the performance of a single large telescope • JPL provides interferometer instruments and formation flying sensors • Ball provides 2 spacecraft, integration and test, and operations for the spacecraft • Heliocentric, earth trailing orbit to eliminate gravity field perturbations • Two spacecraft formation-flying to 2 cm accuracy • Low-jitter spacecraft to permit interferometer to lock on fringes

  5. Black Magic of Interferometry

  6. Formation Flying, in the Dark X 42º Starlight View Range 26º Half Cones of Shadow (all components are shaded) Collector Optics 52º Starlight View Range Collector S/C Intra Instrument Line of Sight Combiner S/C Combiner Instrument

  7. Who’s Driving our Configuration? • Fit both spacecraft within the 3m, 3 stage, Delta II Fairing Envelope • Interface to the standard Delta 37” clamp band • Keep the CG within launch vehicle limitations • Accommodation of Interferometer instruments and Formation Flying Sensors • Provide unobstructed fields of view for • StarLight interferometer • intra-interferometer starlight link • Formation Flying sensors • Star Trackers • Antennas • Thrusters • Sun sensors • Solar arrays • Maintain CG balance after fuel depletion

  8. Launch & Cruise Configurations Delta II 3m-3 Stage Fairing Combiner S/C 100” Collector S/C 37’’ Interface Ring Star 48B 3rd Stage Motor 108”

  9. These Spacecraft are Nicely Equipped Interferometer Sun Sensors (x14) Low Impulse Cold Gas thrusters (x16) UHF antennas (Inter s/c comm) Solar Panel 106 in./270 cm dia. Deployable Sunshade 134 in./340 cm dia. High Accuracy Formation Flying Sensors Star Trackers (x2)

  10. Modular Designs Reduce Risk • Modularity reduces I&T complexity and time required • Modularity improves accessibility • S/C bus components housed in Main Bus Assembly • Instrument is it’s own entity Interferometer Main Bus Assembly 2-Piece Solar Array Propulsion Module Formation Flying Sensor Module Hatch

  11. Commonality is Important • StarLight uses nearly identical composite structures to • closely match the characteristics of the interferometer optical benches • minimize mass • Commonality helps to • Reduce I&T complexity • Reduce risk • Lower cost IMU X-Band Transponder Telecom “gear” Transceiver Propulsion “gear” Relay Box Reaction Wheels (x4) Battery Hatch Star Trackers (x2) SCU (Computer)

  12. Structural Requirements • Minimum natural frequency of the launch stack • 15 Hz Lateral • 35 Hz Axial • 35 Hz Secondary • Applied to all components except the fixed sun shade • Max Axial Load: 9.5 g axial combined with 0.1 g lateral • Max Lateral Load: 2.8 g axial combined with 3.0 g lateral • Minimum factor of safety • Yield: 1.25 • Ultimate: 1.50 • Other requirements (acoustic, random, etc.) not expected to be critical • Alignments

  13. StarLight FEM • Finite element models • of Launch Configuration for structural modes analysis • of separated s/c to analyze on-orbit disturbances Combiner Spacecraft Launch Configuration Collector Spacecraft

  14. Modes Analysis 1st Axial Mode of 38 Hz 1st Lateral Mode of 15.3 Hz

  15. Deployable is a Dangerous Word • Inter-Satellite Separation Mechanisms • Tolerance analysis • Separation dynamics • ABSOLUTELY MUST WORK! • Sunshade • Material selection crucial • RF transparent • Visibly opaque • Stiffness • ABSOLUTELY MUST WORK! Connector Separation Plane Separation Nut Separation Spring

  16. Some Other Thoughts • Some basic engineering principles I think are important • When you start a design, just get something down on paper • If you leave something as a placeholder, document it as such and make sure to go back and fix it • Allocate lots of time for test, this is where everything comes together, and that is the point, isn’t it? • Test early, test often, test it again • Never compromise your ethics • If the design isn’t working, is behind schedule or over budget, say so, don’t mislead anyone, they may be able to help • If you see a problem, speak up • Getting involved is the best way to learn • Space Grant provided opportunities I couldn’t get anywhere else • Great exposure to industry • Opportunities you don’t always get in industry • Learning in a classroom is one thing, but applying your skills in a “real world” environment with real accountability and responsibility is where the challenge and fun are.

  17. Questions?

More Related