1 / 25

Tendering – How low do you go?

Tendering – How low do you go?. Claire Lemer. My Roles. The Commissioning Process. Designing services. Deciding priorities. Shaping structure of supply. PHASE 2: Procuring services. PHASE 1: Strategic planning. Reviewing service provisions. Planning capacity and managing demand.

edana
Download Presentation

Tendering – How low do you go?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tendering – How low do you go? Claire Lemer

  2. My Roles

  3. The Commissioning Process Designing services Deciding priorities Shaping structure of supply PHASE 2: Procuring services PHASE 1: Strategic planning Reviewing service provisions Planning capacity and managing demand Assessing need PHASE 3: Monitoring and evaluation Seeking public and patient views Supporting patient choice Managing performance

  4. Why Tender? • To introduce new providers • To encourage efficiency in the system • To drive innovation • To ensure value for money

  5. Alternatives to tendering • Negotiated altered pricing plans • Reconfiguration • Bringing in external management • Private e.g. Just management • Public e.g. Opth at BGH is by RFH

  6. Tendering for the market... Publically available slides by Charlie Davie Neurologist

  7. Publically available slides by Charlie Davie Neurologist

  8. Publically available slides by Charlie Davie Neurologist

  9. Publically available slides by Charlie Davie Neurologist

  10. The Big Picture

  11. The Slightly smaller picture

  12. The Local Picture • New buildings • Requirement to meet financial targets • Articulation of vision and mission • Increasing focus on Quality of Care – Francis Report • Increasing focus on patient satisfaction • Increasing competition from external providers • Uncertainty whilst wider changes enfold

  13. The Tender Process Advertisement of Intended Tender Intention To Tender Short-listing of ITTs Full Tender Short-listing of Full Tenders Interviews Decision announced Appeals

  14. DRSS- Nationally • National screening programme v.v. specific rules: • Proportion to invite to screen • Proportion to be screened • Exemptions • Training of screeners • Computerised programmes linking GP records to computer system

  15. Screening Pathway Patient identified as Diabetic from GP records Patient invited to screening Patient screened by photography Patient screened using slit lamp Photograph reviewed Result not possible Patient advised Screen result given to patient, GP and entered into record

  16. Locally • NMUH provided DRSS for approximately 50,000 pa • Grew organically • Started before the national screening programme • Covered Enfield and Haringey • Camden and Islington Programme suspended • NMUH took over C+I for 1 year • Tender for 5 areas including Barnet • Barnet had their own service provided by GPs – very high standard • E+H not quite meeting national targets in 18 months prior to tender

  17. How would you go about preparing the proposal?

  18. A False Start..

  19. ITT • Short document • Focused on organisational ability to deliver • Will ask about insurance, previous history • Limited information about planned option • Often no cost indication • Accompanying this will be a service specification asking identifying what the commissioners want

  20. What we did locally.. • Disconnect confusing governance lines • Improve our local performance • Prove ourselves capable of managing a bigger programme • Build links with commissioning team • Build information about competitors • Get the exec on side • Decide if we would join a consortia • Create a tender team: • Exec • Lead for DRSS • Programme heads • HR • Finance

  21. Full Tender -The Proposal • Very formulaic, strict word counts • Opening page often about costs • May even expect a bottom line figure

  22. What we did locally.. • Map out staff we had • Map out staff that we would need to employ • Identify what our preferred model of delivery was • Lower banded staff doing work? • Outsourcing reviewing • Numbers of sites • Involvement of opticians • Same day results? • Map staffing onto this preferred model • Identify the key areas of concern: • Prisons, Mental Health • Hard to reach groups • How low could we go... • Was NMUH prepared to subsidise the bid? • Where there any bits of the service that were not included in the bid? • What were the knock on effects of loosing the service? • The “brainwave”

  23. The Interview • Panel of commissioners • 15 mins to present and answer questions • Limited number of people able to present

  24. Interview Team • Practiced the pitch • Identified who to take • Practised potential questions • Spent time guessing who the panel was

  25. Then the fun really begins – delivery..

More Related